Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Pain Control During First-trimester Abortion

NCT ID: NCT05320432

Last Updated: 2025-02-25

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-20

Study Completion Date

2024-03-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

First-trimester abortion aspiration procedures are painful and sedation is typically provided. It is unsafe to drive after sedation due to the prolonged motor delay from some anesthetic agents. Without a known escort, most clinics do not allow patients to use public transportation, taxis, or rideshare services. Arranging a ride may be harder for those seeking abortion care than other surgical procedures given privacy concerns and the need to travel far distances. Additionally, some people have medical reasons that makes sedation in an outpatient abortion clinic unsafe. As abortion restrictions increase and more people need to travel far distances to access care, it is important to investigate non-pharmacologic pain control options.

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) delivers a low-level electrical current through the skin. By activating the descending inhibitory systems in the central nervous system, these pulses of electrical current reduce sensitivity to pain. TENS has been shown to be effective in decreasing pain with menstrual cramps and during medication abortion, and it was found to be non-inferior to IV sedation for first-trimester procedural abortion. However, it remains unclear if TENS is better than ibuprofen and local anesthesia via paracervical block alone.

The overarching goal of this research is to identify an inexpensive, non-pharmacologic, alternative pain control strategy for those with a medical or social contraindication to IV sedation. The specific aim of this project is to evaluate the efficacy of TENS to prevent pain during first-trimester procedural abortion. To achieve this objective, a blinded, randomized superiority trial comparing the use of TENS to sham for management of pain during first-trimester aspiration abortion is proposed. This research is significant because the validation of a non-pharmacologic pain management technique would decrease barriers to accessing abortion care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Abortion is common: one in four individuals will seek this care during their reproductive lifetime. Most abortions occur in the first trimester and nearly all - greater than 95% - occur in the outpatient clinic setting. Uterine aspiration is painful; most patients desire additional analgesia beyond local anesthesia. However, not every patient is a candidate for office sedation since multiple medical conditions are a contraindication and patients must have a ride home. The prolonged motor delay from some anesthetic agents makes driving after sedation unsafe. Without a known escort to monitor for surgical and anesthetic complications as recommended by the American Society of Anesthesia, most clinics do not allow patients to use public transportation, taxis, or rideshare services. Arranging a ride may be harder for those seeking abortion care than other surgical procedures given privacy concerns and the need to travel far distances. As abortion restrictions increase and more people need to travel far distances to access care, it is important to investigate non-pharmacologic pain control options. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) delivers an electrical current through the skin to activate the descending inhibitory systems in the central nervous system, effectively reducing sensitivity to pain. A previous trial comparing TENS to IV sedation found similar postoperative pain scores with a significantly shorter recovery time in the TENS group; however, this study did not evaluate or report intraoperative pain scores. It was found in a randomized controlled trial comparing TENS to IV sedation (in conjunction with local anesthesia) for first-trimester surgical abortion and that TENS had non-inferior pain scores to IV sedation and was considered an acceptable modality for pain control among participants. Through this proposed double blinded randomized controlled trial, it is hoped to demonstrate that TENS is a superior, non-invasive alternative pain control option for people undergoing surgical abortion in the first trimester who otherwise are not eligible for or decline IV sedation. Ultimately, the hope is to identify an inexpensive, alternative, non-pharmacologic pain control strategy for those with a medical or social contraindication to IV sedation in an effort to decrease barriers to accessing abortion care.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Abortion in First Trimester Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)

Prior to the procedure, the patient will have two sets of two self-adhesive electrodes placed parallel to the spinal cord at the T10-L1 and S2-S4 levels for TENS administration. For participants randomized to the experimental group, the non-blinded study coordinator will turn on the TENS unit 5 minutes prior to the procedure and monitor stimulating frequency level (80-100 Hz and pulse duration of 400 microseconds; intensity or frequency will be monitored to be administered to a non-painful level).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)

Intervention Type DEVICE

A low-level electrical current through the skin activates the descending inhibitory systems in the central nervous system.

Sham

For the participants randomized to sham, the same placement of electrodes will occur, but the unit will not be delivering electrical stimulation.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham

Intervention Type DEVICE

No current applied through pads.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)

A low-level electrical current through the skin activates the descending inhibitory systems in the central nervous system.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham

No current applied through pads.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years old or older
* English- or Spanish-fluency
* \<12 weeks gestation
* Presenting for aspiration abortion

Exclusion Criteria

* Planned use of oral or IV sedation
* Contraindications to office-based procedure as determined by attending physician
* Fetal demise
* Requiring pre-procedure use of misoprostol
* Contraindication to TENS units use (pacemaker or epilepsy)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Stanford University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Stanford University

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

62478

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.