Prevalence of Impaired Executive Functions

NCT ID: NCT05311969

Last Updated: 2023-10-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-04-11

Study Completion Date

2023-07-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The evaluation of executive functions, as well as the means of stimulating and preserving them, are at the heart of the challenges for maintaining a level of functional autonomy in the elderly, but also during the loss of this functional autonomy and when entering a situation of dependence and/or dementia. Research that has demonstrated the preponderant role of executive functions on functional abilities are examples of this. Components such as planning, organization, initiation, mental flexibility appear to be strongly correlated with the effective performance of complex activities of daily living. In addition, the capacities for autonomy were found to be significantly reduced, and significantly with the severity of the executive deficits. In addition, if these data have since contributed to determining a level of impairment of the executive processes specific to an early loss of autonomy, they are so in the context of early diagnosis of dementia and validation of a detection tool, early loss of autonomy. The scientific advances of the last five years contribute to a better understanding of the impact of executive disorders, but on the other hand, the diversity of the explanatory phenomena of these disorders considerably complicates their nosology within neuro-evolutionary pathologies. Ultimately, an analysis of executive function disorders must take into account cognitive and behavioral aspects, that is to say, beyond performance on tests identified as involving executive functions, behavioral disorders, emotional status and level of autonomy in activities of daily living. In the state of our knowledge, the consideration of executive functions represents a strategic point at the crossroads of the evaluation of the act of care and treatment. Establishing data on the prevalence of alterations in the executive functions of residents, exploring the possibilities of evaluation with a battery of tests little used in this context and linking "executive" profiles and clinical situations seems to us a relevant and interesting first step. However essential to provide a beginning of answer to these questions. This study being an exploratory study. The results of this study will constitute new prevalence data in the population of residents of nursing homes. The aim here is to establish data on the prevalence of alterations in the executive functions of residents, to explore the possibilities of evaluation with a battery of tests little used in this context and to relate the profiles "executives" and clinical situations. This in order to develop a methodology to draw up a general assessment, and to make comparisons of the different profiles, inter/intra pathologies and stages of evolution. Thus, a more in-depth knowledge of the specific profiles of Nursing Home residents will also lead to the reflection of pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic strategies. Finally, it will ultimately be a question of presenting an inventory of the situation of Nursing Home to alert public policies. The main objective is to study the prevalence of impaired executive functions in nursing home residents. The secondary objectives are to explore the feasibility of carrying out executive function tests and to examine the coorelationbetween the levels of impairment of executive functions and the clinical and functional characteristics of residents.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Participants will be recruited by the investigating doctor and the healthcare team. Participants must meet the defined inclusion criteria The steps:

1. Screening Pre-selection of participants potentially eligible for the study (inclusion/non-inclusion criteria) and collection of data from medical records and the healthcare database.

The information can be collected by the nursing coordinator of the Nursing home. The diagnosis will be determined by the investigating physician of each center and the inclusion criteria checked.
2. Pre-inclusion-inclusion visit

* Confirmation of eligibility criteria for participants selected for the screening phase
* Delivery of Consent forms for reading, for explanation of the study methods (procedure, context, objective, constraints), and to answer any questions. If the participant agrees to participate in the study. The consent forms must be signed and dated before any act carried out within the framework of the research. A time of reflection can be granted before the signature. The evaluation of global cognitive functioning with the Mini Mental State Examination will be carried out. Each potentially eligible participant will be given an information note on the conduct of the study followed by an informed consent form that he and the investigator will need to sign before the start of the study.

The course of the study for the participant will consist of 4 visits with the psychologist and/or the doctor:

Pre-inclusion consultation, Visit 0: during which the participant will take a questionnaire carried out by the psychologist to assess overall cognitive functioning, and the inclusion consultation by the on-site investigator doctor to check whether the participant corresponds to all study criteria. Following this visit, the participant may choose to participate in the research by signing the consent form.

The visits will take place as follows, spread over 14 to a maximum of 65 days from Pré-inclusion
3. Visits

Visit 1. (20 to 45 minutes, up to 15 days after Visit 0). This visit will allow to do:

* a clinical assessment with the investigating doctor,
* a behavioral assessment by the nursing staff or the psychologist.
* four cognitive tests for a total duration of approximately 15 minutes carried out by the psychologist.
* Additional visit (10 days later maximum): only if one or more tests have not been carried out or completed during visit 1.

Visit 2. (About 25 minutes, 7 to 10 days after visit Visit 1). This visit will allow you to:

* an evaluation of executive functions by the neuropsychologist with four new cognitive tests:
* Additional visit (10 days later maximum): only if one or more tests have not been carried out or completed during visit 2.

Visit 3. (About 30 minutes, 7 to 10 days after visit Visit 2). This visit will allow you to:

* a final evaluation of executive functions by the neuropsychologist with four new cognitive tests:
* Additional visit (10 days later maximum): only if one or more tests have not been carried out or completed during visit 3.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Executive Dysfunctions

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

groups/cohort

participants will perform the various neuropsychological tests provided for in the protocol

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

cognitive evaluations and non cognitive evaluations

Intervention Type OTHER

Cognitive evaluations with executive functions evaluations :

* Mini Mental State Examination
* Stroop Victoria Test
* Hayling test
* Frontal Assessment Battery test mental flexibility:
* Trial Making Test (TMT) A and B
* Connection test
* Alphaflex test
* Verbal and visuospatial working memory
* Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) span
* Visuo-spatial span
* Visuo-spatial span simplified version
* Month Of the Year Backwards (MOTYB) Planning
* Tinker Toy test
* Clock Test

Non-cognitive evaluations:

The Katz Autonomy Scale Neuropsychiatric Inventory version Care team Geriatric Depression Scale 15-item version Apathy inventory

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

cognitive evaluations and non cognitive evaluations

Cognitive evaluations with executive functions evaluations :

* Mini Mental State Examination
* Stroop Victoria Test
* Hayling test
* Frontal Assessment Battery test mental flexibility:
* Trial Making Test (TMT) A and B
* Connection test
* Alphaflex test
* Verbal and visuospatial working memory
* Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) span
* Visuo-spatial span
* Visuo-spatial span simplified version
* Month Of the Year Backwards (MOTYB) Planning
* Tinker Toy test
* Clock Test

Non-cognitive evaluations:

The Katz Autonomy Scale Neuropsychiatric Inventory version Care team Geriatric Depression Scale 15-item version Apathy inventory

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Permanent resident in Nursing Home or in temporary accommodation for more than 3 months
* speak and understand the French language
* Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) between 7 and 24 dating from 8 maximum days
* Compulsorily affiliated with a social security scheme
* Agree to participate in the study in agreement with the trusted person (if applicable)
* co-signatures of the Consent Form between the investigator and the participant or the person of trust (if applicable)

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal to sign the consent form
* Resident in a specialized unit for behavioral disorders (Cognitive Behavioral Unit (CBU), Reinforced Accommodation Unit (RAU), Disoriented Elderly Unit (DEU), Centers of Natural Activities Drawn from Useful Occupations (NADUO) et cetera)
* Communication difficulties, sensory and/or motor deficits
* Medical contraindication in relation to a psychological state that could be altered due to participation in the study
* Resident at end of life (life expectancy \< 3 months)
* Resident under legal protection
* Participation within 48 hours prior to inclusion in another research
Minimum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Gerontopôle des Pays de la Loire

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fondation Korian pour le Bien Vieillir

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gilles BERRUT

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Gerontopôle des Pays de la Loire

Leila LAIFA-MARY

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Korian

Priscilla CLOT-FAYBESSE

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Korian

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

KORIAN La Côte Sauvage

Ars-en-Ré, , France

Site Status

Korian Villa Louisa

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Korian Villa Evora

Chartres, , France

Site Status

Korian Le Catelli

L'Huisserie, , France

Site Status

Korian Doubs Rivage

Montbéliard, , France

Site Status

Korian Bois Robillard

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Korian Le Baron

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Korian Les Arcades

Paris, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol. 2000 Aug;41(1):49-100. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10945922 (View on PubMed)

Belleville S, Rouleau N, Van der Linden M. Use of the Hayling task to measure inhibition of prepotent responses in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. Brain Cogn. 2006 Nov;62(2):113-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.04.006. Epub 2006 Jun 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16757076 (View on PubMed)

Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, Rosenberg-Thompson S, Carusi DA, Gornbein J. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology. 1994 Dec;44(12):2308-14. doi: 10.1212/wnl.44.12.2308.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7991117 (View on PubMed)

Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, Pillon B. The FAB: a Frontal Assessment Battery at bedside. Neurology. 2000 Dec 12;55(11):1621-6. doi: 10.1212/wnl.55.11.1621.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11113214 (View on PubMed)

Fisk JE, Sharp CA. Age-related impairment in executive functioning: updating, inhibition, shifting, and access. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2004 Oct;26(7):874-90. doi: 10.1080/13803390490510680.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15742539 (View on PubMed)

KATZ S, FORD AB, MOSKOWITZ RW, JACKSON BA, JAFFE MW. STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION. JAMA. 1963 Sep 21;185:914-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14044222 (View on PubMed)

Makino T, Umegaki H, Suzuki Y, Yanagawa M, Nonogaki Z, Nakashima H, Kuzuya M. Relationship between small cerebral white matter lesions and cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer's disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2014 Oct;14(4):819-26. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12176. Epub 2013 Nov 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24215176 (View on PubMed)

Blanco Martin E, Ugarriza Serrano I, Elcoroaristizabal Martin X, Galdos Alcelay L, Molano Salazar A, Bereincua Gandarias R, Ingles Borda S, Uterga Valiente JM, Indakoetxea Juanbeltz MB, Moraza Lopez J, Barandiaran Amillano M, Fernandez-Martinez M. Dysexecutive syndrome in amnesic mild cognitive impairment: a multicenter study. BMC Neurol. 2016 Jun 4;16:88. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0607-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27260328 (View on PubMed)

Perry RJ, Hodges JR. Differentiating frontal and temporal variant frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 2000 Jun 27;54(12):2277-84. doi: 10.1212/wnl.54.12.2277.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10881252 (View on PubMed)

Robert PH, Clairet S, Benoit M, Koutaich J, Bertogliati C, Tible O, Caci H, Borg M, Brocker P, Bedoucha P. The apathy inventory: assessment of apathy and awareness in Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002 Dec;17(12):1099-105. doi: 10.1002/gps.755.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12461757 (View on PubMed)

Roussel M, Lhommee E, Narme P, Czernecki V, Gall DL, Krystkowiak P, Diouf M, Godefroy O; GREFEX study group. Dysexecutive syndrome in Parkinson's disease: the GREFEX study. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2017 Sep;24(5):496-507. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2016.1226248. Epub 2016 Sep 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27585478 (View on PubMed)

Salthouse TA, Toth J, Daniels K, Parks C, Pak R, Wolbrette M, Hocking KJ. Effects of aging on efficiency of task switching in a variant of the trail making test. Neuropsychology. 2000 Jan;14(1):102-11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10674802 (View on PubMed)

Stuss DT. Functions of the frontal lobes: relation to executive functions. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2011 Sep;17(5):759-65. doi: 10.1017/S1355617711000695. Epub 2011 May 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21729406 (View on PubMed)

Stuss DT, Alexander MP, Shallice T, Picton TW, Binns MA, Macdonald R, Borowiec A, Katz DI. Multiple frontal systems controlling response speed. Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(3):396-417. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.06.010.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15707616 (View on PubMed)

Tomaszewski Farias S, Cahn-Weiner DA, Harvey DJ, Reed BR, Mungas D, Kramer JH, Chui H. Longitudinal changes in memory and executive functioning are associated with longitudinal change in instrumental activities of daily living in older adults. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 Apr;23(3):446-61. doi: 10.1080/13854040802360558. Epub 2008 Sep 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18821181 (View on PubMed)

Torralva T, Roca M, Gleichgerrcht E, Bekinschtein T, Manes F. A neuropsychological battery to detect specific executive and social cognitive impairments in early frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2009 May;132(Pt 5):1299-309. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp041. Epub 2009 Mar 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19336463 (View on PubMed)

Torralva T, Roca M, Gleichgerrcht E, Lopez P, Manes F. INECO Frontal Screening (IFS): a brief, sensitive, and specific tool to assess executive functions in dementia. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009 Sep;15(5):777-86. doi: 10.1017/S1355617709990415. Epub 2009 Jul 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19635178 (View on PubMed)

Tosto G, Zimmerman ME, Hamilton JL, Carmichael OT, Brickman AM; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. The effect of white matter hyperintensities on neurodegeneration in mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Dement. 2015 Dec;11(12):1510-1519. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.05.014. Epub 2015 Jun 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26079417 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EXEPA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.