Trial Outcomes & Findings for Analysis and Suppression of Tremor During Grasp Using Ultrasound Imaging and Electrical Stimulation (NCT NCT05308368)
NCT ID: NCT05308368
Last Updated: 2025-10-27
Results Overview
The investigators will use ultrasound features collected on participants to develop novel models for tremor that can accurately predict the joint position. The joint position measured by the IMU will used as a benchmark and the root mean squared error (RMSE \[Deg.\]) between the model's predicted joint angle and the true angle will be used as a metric. A higher RMSE (in the scale of 0-100%) implies lower model accuracy.
COMPLETED
NA
12 participants
Through Completion of Study, an average of 3 years
2025-10-27
Participant Flow
2021-recruitment of 1 participant 2022- recruitment of 8 participants 2023- recruitment of 3 participants
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Tremor Group
Individuals with either parkinson's disease or essential tremor will be recruited in this group
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Analysis and Suppression of Tremor During Grasp Using Ultrasound Imaging and Electrical Stimulation
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Tremor Group
n=12 Participants
Individuals with either parkinson's disease or essential tremor will be recruited in this group
Ultrasound Imaging: We will collect ultrasound images during the grasping motion for both groups
Electromyography: We will collect electromyography (EMG) signals of both the flexor and extensor muscles of the wrist during the grasping motion for both groups
Inertial Measurement Units (IMU): We will use data from the ultrasound images and EMG to develop a tremor model. The model will be validated in comparison to joint angle measurements from an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) collected during the grasping motion
Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES): We will use the develop closed-loop control methods for tremor suppression using information from the ultrasound-image based tremor models. FES will be used to provide stimulation that will help with tremor suppression
|
Able Body Group
Individuals with no disorders will be recruited in this group
Ultrasound Imaging: We will collect ultrasound images during the grasping motion for both groups
Electromyography: We will collect electromyography (EMG) signals of both the flexor and extensor muscles of the wrist during the grasping motion for both groups
Inertial Measurement Units (IMU): We will use data from the ultrasound images and EMG to develop a tremor model. The model will be validated in comparison to joint angle measurements from an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) collected during the grasping motion
Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES): We will use the develop closed-loop control methods for tremor suppression using information from the ultrasound-image based tremor models. FES will be used to provide stimulation that will help with tremor suppression
|
Total
n=12 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Through Completion of Study, an average of 3 yearsPopulation: Only participants who completed assessment are included.
The investigators will use ultrasound features collected on participants to develop novel models for tremor that can accurately predict the joint position. The joint position measured by the IMU will used as a benchmark and the root mean squared error (RMSE \[Deg.\]) between the model's predicted joint angle and the true angle will be used as a metric. A higher RMSE (in the scale of 0-100%) implies lower model accuracy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tremor Group
n=6 Participants
Individuals with either parkinson's disease or essential tremor will be recruited in this group
|
|---|---|
|
Tremor Model Accuracy
Tremor Model Prediction Accuracy without stimulation
|
24 Normalized RMSE (%)
Standard Deviation 4.49
|
|
Tremor Model Accuracy
Tremor Model Prediction Accuracy with stimulation
|
21 Normalized RMSE (%)
Standard Deviation 2.66
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Through Completion of Study, an average of 3 yearsPopulation: Only participants who completed assessment are included in the analysis
The investigators will benchmark the performance of the ultrasound features (fascicle length \[mm\], muscle thickness \[mm\]) in detecting the actual tremor frequency (Hz) measured by an inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor and electromyography (EMG). Here error between the tremor frequency measured with IMU and the ultrasound feature-derived tremor frequency is reported. A lower mean error (0-100%) implies higher concurrence with the IMU-derived or EMG-derived tremor frequency.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tremor Group
n=6 Participants
Individuals with either parkinson's disease or essential tremor will be recruited in this group
|
|---|---|
|
Ultrasound Imaging Based Frequency Detection
Frequency Comparison with EMG
|
6.4 Error percentage (%)
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
|
Ultrasound Imaging Based Frequency Detection
Frequency Comparison with IMU
|
8.9 Error percentage (%)
Standard Deviation 0.57
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Through Completion of Study, an average of 3 yearsPopulation: Only participants who completed these experiments are included in the analysis
The investigators will use the developed tremor models to develop closed loop control methods using FES which enable tremor suppression. The goal of the controller will be to maintain a desired wrist angle position while performing a grasping motion. A tremor suppression ratio metric, formulated as 1-(W\_t/W\_b), where W\_t is the angular velocity of the wrist around the vertical during periods in which stimulation was turned on and W\_b is the angular velocity during baseline periods without any stimulation, is used as an evaluation metric. A higher tremor suppression ratio (0-100%) means higher effectiveness in suppressing the tremor.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tremor Group
n=8 Participants
Individuals with either parkinson's disease or essential tremor will be recruited in this group
|
|---|---|
|
Tremor Suppression (Percentage)
|
62.4 Percentage Suppression
Standard Deviation 18.93
|
Adverse Events
Tremor Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place