PRagmatic EVAluation of a Quality Improvement Program for People Living With Modifiable High-risk COPD.

NCT ID: NCT05306743

Last Updated: 2023-10-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

126 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-23

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A 3-year cluster randomized controlled trial of the impact of a quality improvement and clinical decision support package versus usual care for patients with modifiable high-risk chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with or without a current diagnosis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a frequently underdiagnosed major health problem, responsible for over 250 million cases of disease and 3 million deaths (5% of all deaths) worldwide in 2015. Despite resulting in more than $30 billion in direct healthcare costs in the USA, and causing significant morbidity and lost days of work, COPD remains a globally under-recognised condition, with an estimated 60% of cases undetected at any one time, and frequently misdiagnosed in smokers and people with asthma.

Even once diagnosed, about two thirds of patients will have already experienced significant lung function decline or previous serious exacerbations, indicating that opportunities for earlier diagnosis may have been lost. The consequences of this have been summarized persuasively using data from large population-based studies of patients, demonstrating higher future risk of exacerbations, accelerated lung function decline, greater risk of cardiovascular events, higher mortality rates, and larger healthcare costs in late diagnosed patients with a symptomatic history.

Several proof of principle studies have demonstrated the feasibility of case finding in primary care, however, in practice it is patchily implemented if at all, with inconsistent evidence demonstrating significant positive impact. This is partially because post-case finding, patient follow-up and management can be poor and significant subgroups of COPD patients with frequent exacerbations or high symptom scores remain undertreated or under-monitored according to quality standards. Such patients represent a high-risk "phenotype" in whom risk may be reduced with dedicated measures taken for individualized, targeted management. This may be achieved by analyzing patient electronic medical records (EMR) data as a means to identify patients with modifiable, high-risk COPD in whom there remains options to further optimize their treatment according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) recommendations.

The CONQUEST intervention (Collaboration on a Quality Improvement Initiative to Achieve Excellence in Standards of COPD Care) will address areas for optimization of the management of patients with modifiable high-risk COPD, or potential COPD, through a targeted Quality Improvement Program (QIP) in primary care practices. The intervention will implement validated algorithms (appropriately adapted for CONQUEST) to identify patients with modifiable high-risk COPD or undiagnosed patients with potential modifiable high-risk COPD, and support their management through a multicomponent package incorporating Clinical Decision Support (CDS).

Parallel to this, the pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial - "PREVAIL" (PRagmatic EVAluation of a quality Improvement program for people Living with modifiable high-risk COPD) will be conducted evaluating the effectiveness of the CONQUEST intervention compared to usual care. Primary care teams will be the cluster unit of randomization.

Because of the established relationship between risk of major cardiac events and exacerbations, the effectiveness of the CONQUEST program will be evaluated in terms of COPD exacerbations and cardiovascular or respiratory events. The design of this trial presents a unique opportunity to compare major adverse cardiac or respiratory events (MACRE) outcomes in a naturally-occurring group of patients who are both frequent exacerbators and either treatment-naïve or undertreated at trial baseline, and to measure these outcomes over a period of time comparatively longer than the standard 52 weeks of many clinical trials of COPD medications.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A total of 126 primary care teams (PCT) will be enrolled in the trial; 63 PCTs will be randomized to the intervention arm and receive the CONQUEST QIP, and 63 to the control arm where they will receive care as usual.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CONQUEST Intervention Arm

Intervention arm clusters will receive the CONQUEST quality improvement program.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CONQUEST Quality Improvement Program

Intervention Type OTHER

CONQUEST supports primary healthcare professionals to diagnose, assess, and optimize the management of their patients with modifiable high-risk COPD, through the promotion of guideline-based care. CONQUEST will promote management according to four "Quality Standards" for the care of modifiable high-risk COPD patients. The Quality Standards can be summarized as the timely and appropriate: Identification of high-risk patient groups for assessment; Assessment of disease and quantification of future risk; Non-pharmacological and pharmacological intervention; Follow-up. CONQUEST program will promote adherence to these standards through the use of electronic medical record -based algorithms for the identification of high-risk patients and clinical decision support resources. All decisions regarding patient management are made entirely at the discretion of the clinicians and patients who together negotiate the preferred course of action during consultations.

Delayed Intervention Arm

The CONQUEST quality improvement program will be rolled-out to the delayed intervention practices at the end of the outcome evaluation period.

Group Type OTHER

CONQUEST Quality Improvement Program

Intervention Type OTHER

CONQUEST supports primary healthcare professionals to diagnose, assess, and optimize the management of their patients with modifiable high-risk COPD, through the promotion of guideline-based care. CONQUEST will promote management according to four "Quality Standards" for the care of modifiable high-risk COPD patients. The Quality Standards can be summarized as the timely and appropriate: Identification of high-risk patient groups for assessment; Assessment of disease and quantification of future risk; Non-pharmacological and pharmacological intervention; Follow-up. CONQUEST program will promote adherence to these standards through the use of electronic medical record -based algorithms for the identification of high-risk patients and clinical decision support resources. All decisions regarding patient management are made entirely at the discretion of the clinicians and patients who together negotiate the preferred course of action during consultations.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CONQUEST Quality Improvement Program

CONQUEST supports primary healthcare professionals to diagnose, assess, and optimize the management of their patients with modifiable high-risk COPD, through the promotion of guideline-based care. CONQUEST will promote management according to four "Quality Standards" for the care of modifiable high-risk COPD patients. The Quality Standards can be summarized as the timely and appropriate: Identification of high-risk patient groups for assessment; Assessment of disease and quantification of future risk; Non-pharmacological and pharmacological intervention; Follow-up. CONQUEST program will promote adherence to these standards through the use of electronic medical record -based algorithms for the identification of high-risk patients and clinical decision support resources. All decisions regarding patient management are made entirely at the discretion of the clinicians and patients who together negotiate the preferred course of action during consultations.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Primary Care Teams (PCTs) must be able to function as a single randomization unit with low risk of contamination between participants and physicians due to the absence of blinding in the intervention (see section 8.8 for details on blinding).
* PCT must have a sufficient number of patients meeting modifiable high-risk patient criteria (see section 8.1 on sample size estimates).
* PCT must express willingness to be randomized to either receive the CONQUEST program initially, or usual care until program roll-out to the delayed intervention arm.

Exclusion Criteria

* PCTs that are in the process of, or planning to change EHR software provider or practice ownership within the trial outcome evaluation period
* PCTs engaged in active research studies or COPD related Quality Improvement Programs which might impact the ability to implement CONQUEST program.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The DARTNet Institute (DI)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Optimum Patient Care Global Limited

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Colorado

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Mount Sinai

New York, New York, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

MetroHealth

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

David Price, FRCGP

Role: CONTACT

+65 3105 1489

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Rodger Kessler, PhD

Role: primary

Juan Wisnivesky, MD

Role: primary

Yasir Tarabichi, MD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hickman K, Tarabichi Y, Dickens AP, Pullen R, Kerr M, Couper A, Evans A, Gatenby J, Alves L, Ariti C, Bafadhel M, Carter V, Chalmers J, Chen R, Devereux G, Drummond MB, Gibson JM, Halpin DMG, Han M, Hanania NA, Hurst JR, Kaplan A, Kostikas K, Make B, Mapel D, Marshall J, Martinez F, Meldrum C, van Melle M, Miravitlles M, Morris T, Mullerova H, Murray R, Muro S, Nordon C, Ohar J, Pace W, Pollack M, Quint JK, Sharma A, Singh D, Singh M, Trudo F, Williams D, Wilkinson T, Winders T, Price D. Pragmatic Evaluation of an Improvement Program for People Living With Modifiable High-Risk COPD Versus Usual Care: Protocols for the Cluster Randomized PREVAIL Trial. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2025 May 27;12(3):223-239. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0564.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40300198 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OPRI-2003

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Evaluation of COPD Co-Pilot
NCT02944591 UNKNOWN
Real-Time Support for Exercise Persistence in COPD
NCT00373932 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2