Optimal PeriproCeduraL AnticOagulation in Structural Transseptal Interventions
NCT ID: NCT05305612
Last Updated: 2024-12-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
PHASE4
410 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-03-13
2025-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of the study is to establish the optimal timing of initiation of periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing structural heart interventions requiring transseptal puncture (TEER and LAAC), Patients who undergo TEER implantation or LAAC procedure will be randomized to two groups:
1. Early UFH administration. The iv. bolus of UFH (100Units/kg) will be given after obtained femoral vein access and at least 5 minutes prior to the start of the TSP.
2. Late UFH administration. The iv. bolus of UFH (100Units/kg) will be given immediately after TSP, defined as the introduction of transseptal sheath into the left atrium.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
Early unfractionated heparin administration. The iv. bolus of UFH (100Units/kg) will be given after obtained femoral vein access and at least 5 minutes prior to the start of the TSP.
Late unfractionated heparin administration. The iv. bolus of UFH (100Units/kg) will be given immediately after TSP, defined as the introduction of transseptal sheath into the left atrium.
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Early UFH administration
The iv. bolus of UFH (100Units/kg) will be given after obtained femoral vein access and at least 5 minutes prior to the start of the TSP.
early anticoagulation
Anticoagulation prior to transseptal puncture
Late UFH administration
The iv. bolus of UFH (100Units/kg) will be given immediately after TSP, defined as the introduction of transseptal sheath into the left atrium.
late anticoagulation
Anticoagulation after transseptal puncture
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
early anticoagulation
Anticoagulation prior to transseptal puncture
late anticoagulation
Anticoagulation after transseptal puncture
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Planned TEER procedure or left atrial appendage closure
3. The patient is willing to sign informed consent and comply will all study procedure
Exclusion Criteria
2. Congenital or acquire bleeding disorders (i.e.diagnosed thrombophilia, bleeding diathesis, thrombocyopenia with platelet count \<50 thousand/ml, INR elevated \>1.5 in the last test prior to randomization)
3. INR \> 1.5 within 24 hours prior to the procedure in patients chronically treated with vitamin K antagonists. (applies to the last INR value prior to randomization)
4. Last dose of new oral anticoagulant \< 48 hours prior to the procedure (assessed at randomization)
5. Last dose of low molecular weight heparin \<12 hours prior to the procedure (assessed at randomization)
6. Contraindications to MR imaging (i.e. claustrophobia, ferromagnetic intraocular foreign boddies, ferromagnetic metalic prostheses)
7. Implanted cardiac devices for electrotherapy if:
* device has epicardial leads
* left disconnected leads or non-functional or damaged devices
* device implanted within abdominal wall
* the patient is pacemaker dependant (lack of escape rhytm \>30/min)
* the device was implanted or exchanged within 6 weeks prior to the MR examination
* device mulfunction identified during the control performed prior to the MR examination, that in the opinion of electrophysiologist team may impact the safety of MR imaging
* low voltage of the device battery - the battery on the examination day should have at least 20% of the voltage value between the nominal value and elective replacement indicator (ERI) value, or the expected battery life calculated by the device should equal or exceed one year.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical Research Agency, Poland
OTHER_GOV
Soft Communication, Poland
UNKNOWN
National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jerzy Pręgowski, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Institute of Cardiology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne Gdański Uniwersytet Medyczny
Gdansk, , Poland
Górnośląskie Centrum Medyczne im. Leszka Gieca Śląskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego
Katowice, , Poland
Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny nr 4 w Lublinie
Lublin, , Poland
Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Poznaniu
Poznan, , Poland
Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne Warszawskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego
Warsaw, , Poland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pregowski J, Pracon R, Mioduszewska A, Skowronski J, Sondergaard L, Mintz GS, Capodanno D, Kim SW, De Baker O, Wacinski P, Wojakowski W, Rdzanek A, Grygier M, Chmielecki M, Franco LN, Stoklosa P, Firek B, Marczak M, Milosz B, Chmielak Z, Demkow M, Witkowski A. Strategy to optimize PeriproCeduraL AnticOagulation in structural transseptal interventions: Design and rationale of the STOP CLOT trial. Am Heart J. 2024 May;271:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.02.015. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ABM/2020/1/00002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id