Optimal PeriproCeduraL AnticOagulation in Structural Transseptal Interventions

NCT ID: NCT05305612

Last Updated: 2024-12-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

410 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-03-13

Study Completion Date

2025-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The transcatheter edge to edge mitral valve repair (TEER) and left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) are the interventional cardiology procedures that require periprocedural anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH). The UFH is administered either before or immediately after transseptal puncture, at the discretion of the operator

The aim of the study is to establish the optimal timing of initiation of periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing structural heart interventions requiring transseptal puncture (TEER and LAAC), Patients who undergo TEER implantation or LAAC procedure will be randomized to two groups:

1. Early UFH administration. The iv. bolus of UFH (100Units/kg) will be given after obtained femoral vein access and at least 5 minutes prior to the start of the TSP.
2. Late UFH administration. The iv. bolus of UFH (100Units/kg) will be given immediately after TSP, defined as the introduction of transseptal sheath into the left atrium.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mitral Regurgitation Atrial Fibrillation Anticoagulation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients will be randomized to:

Early unfractionated heparin administration. The iv. bolus of UFH (100Units/kg) will be given after obtained femoral vein access and at least 5 minutes prior to the start of the TSP.

Late unfractionated heparin administration. The iv. bolus of UFH (100Units/kg) will be given immediately after TSP, defined as the introduction of transseptal sheath into the left atrium.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
The study will be conducted by blinded and unblinded staff. The participants, investigators, care provider and outcome assessors will be blinded. However, in every center the dedicated unblinded study nurse will randomize the patient and prepare two syringes either with saline or UFH. The syringes will be labeled with number 1 and number 2 and will be provided to the anestesiologist taking care of patient during the procedure. The injection from syringe nr 1 will be administered after obtaining the venous access and 5 minutes before the start of TSP. The injection from syringe nr 2 will be administered after TSP defined as introduction of trans-septal sheath into the left atrium. The unblinding nurse responsible for the randomization procedure and preparation of syringe nr 1 and syringe nr 2 and will be not involved in any other procedures or care of the patients enrolled into the study.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Early UFH administration

The iv. bolus of UFH (100Units/kg) will be given after obtained femoral vein access and at least 5 minutes prior to the start of the TSP.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

early anticoagulation

Intervention Type OTHER

Anticoagulation prior to transseptal puncture

Late UFH administration

The iv. bolus of UFH (100Units/kg) will be given immediately after TSP, defined as the introduction of transseptal sheath into the left atrium.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

late anticoagulation

Intervention Type OTHER

Anticoagulation after transseptal puncture

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

early anticoagulation

Anticoagulation prior to transseptal puncture

Intervention Type OTHER

late anticoagulation

Anticoagulation after transseptal puncture

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age above 18 years
2. Planned TEER procedure or left atrial appendage closure
3. The patient is willing to sign informed consent and comply will all study procedure

Exclusion Criteria

1. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding and those women of childbearing potential who do not agree to use at least two contraceptive measures (oral contraception, mechanical contraception, approved contraceptive implants, intrauterine device, tubal ligation). The criterion does not apply to women who have been postmenopausal for at least 2 years prior to study enrollment (defined as at least one year without menstrual periods) or underwent surgical sterilization procedure. All eligible women who are younger than 55 years must have negative pregnancy test within 24 hours prior to randomization.
2. Congenital or acquire bleeding disorders (i.e.diagnosed thrombophilia, bleeding diathesis, thrombocyopenia with platelet count \<50 thousand/ml, INR elevated \>1.5 in the last test prior to randomization)
3. INR \> 1.5 within 24 hours prior to the procedure in patients chronically treated with vitamin K antagonists. (applies to the last INR value prior to randomization)
4. Last dose of new oral anticoagulant \< 48 hours prior to the procedure (assessed at randomization)
5. Last dose of low molecular weight heparin \<12 hours prior to the procedure (assessed at randomization)
6. Contraindications to MR imaging (i.e. claustrophobia, ferromagnetic intraocular foreign boddies, ferromagnetic metalic prostheses)
7. Implanted cardiac devices for electrotherapy if:

* device has epicardial leads
* left disconnected leads or non-functional or damaged devices
* device implanted within abdominal wall
* the patient is pacemaker dependant (lack of escape rhytm \>30/min)
* the device was implanted or exchanged within 6 weeks prior to the MR examination
* device mulfunction identified during the control performed prior to the MR examination, that in the opinion of electrophysiologist team may impact the safety of MR imaging
* low voltage of the device battery - the battery on the examination day should have at least 20% of the voltage value between the nominal value and elective replacement indicator (ERI) value, or the expected battery life calculated by the device should equal or exceed one year.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical Research Agency, Poland

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Soft Communication, Poland

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jerzy Pręgowski, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Institute of Cardiology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne Gdański Uniwersytet Medyczny

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Górnośląskie Centrum Medyczne im. Leszka Gieca Śląskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego

Katowice, , Poland

Site Status

Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny nr 4 w Lublinie

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Poznaniu

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne Warszawskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Poland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pregowski J, Pracon R, Mioduszewska A, Skowronski J, Sondergaard L, Mintz GS, Capodanno D, Kim SW, De Baker O, Wacinski P, Wojakowski W, Rdzanek A, Grygier M, Chmielecki M, Franco LN, Stoklosa P, Firek B, Marczak M, Milosz B, Chmielak Z, Demkow M, Witkowski A. Strategy to optimize PeriproCeduraL AnticOagulation in structural transseptal interventions: Design and rationale of the STOP CLOT trial. Am Heart J. 2024 May;271:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.02.015. Epub 2024 Feb 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38401649 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ABM/2020/1/00002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id