Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Web Fracture Liaison Service (e_FLS) to Fracture Liaison Services in France: the evAB Study (evAB)
NCT ID: NCT05303350
Last Updated: 2025-11-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-02-29
2025-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of a Fracture Liaison Service in the Osteoporosis Care
NCT03484208
AI Performance for the Detection of Bone Fractures in Children
NCT05538403
PARamedical Abnormalties Detection of Traumatic Bone Lesion of the extremitIeS
NCT05076188
Optimisation of Falls Prevention After Low-energy Osteoporotic Fractures: Feasibility Study
NCT03642808
Assessment of the Contribution of an Artificial Intelligence Tool to Help the Diagnosis of Limb Fractures in Pediatric Emergencies
NCT05187585
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The objective of the investigators' study is to compare web FLS model (e\_FLS) to conventional FLS in terms of increasing the proportion of patients receiving an antiosteoporotic treatment in the year after a low trauma fracture (evAB project).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
e_FLS
Patients detected by an automated patient detection tool with a web-based platform
No interventions assigned to this group
FLS
Control group / Conventional group : Patients followed in a conventional fracture liaison department
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The patient or his legal representative does not object to the patient's participation in the research Note: Patients in guardianship or curatorship can be included in this protocol
Exclusion Criteria
* Non registration with a social security scheme (holder or beneficiary).
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
French Society of Rheumatology
OTHER
URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
OTHER
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Karine BRIOT, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
APHP
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cochin Hospital, Rheumatology Department
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022-A00553-40
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
APHP211339
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.