Hyperbaric-oxygen Therapy (HBOT) Versus Placebo for Treating Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) in Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)

NCT ID: NCT05289700

Last Updated: 2022-11-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-15

Study Completion Date

2025-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a randomised, controlled, double-blind, placebo trial of HBOT (intervention) superiority in the treatment of VOC in SCD, to demonstrate the effectiveness of HBOT for the decrease in pain level in the treatment of SCD-VOC.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is one of the most common genetic diseases in the world, affecting approximately 310,000 births each year and causing \>100,000 deaths. Vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) is the most frequent complication of SCD, leading to bone pain, thoracic pain and/or abdominal spasms and is the main cause of death in patients with SCD. It is linked to sickling which is often triggered by internal and external environmental conditions such as acidosis, cold, dehydration, hyperthermia, infection and especially hypoxia. Sickling is initially reversible if local oxygenation supply and conditions are improved.

Rationale: The use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) should enable the patient's tissues to receive the extra oxygen necessary by increasing the amount of dissolved O2 in blood which in turn would limit sickling. A pilot study of 9 patients showed the potential positive effects of HBOT on VOC induced pain. International guidelines indicate that SCD-induced VOC is one of the potential indications for HBOT, even though the evidence available is weak.

Aim and objectives: To demonstrate the analgesic effect of HBOT for VOC and to analyse the procedure's safety, impact on the biological markers of SCD-induced VOC, progression of SCD and cost-effectiveness.

Methodology: This study will be a multicentric, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Any patient presenting at one of the participating centres' Emergency Departments (EDs) with VOC is eligible to be evaluated, included and randomized. Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 8 years or over with a major SCD, having a VOC non-responsive to level 2 analgesics (WHO classification), with or without Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS). Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy, indication for artificial ventilation, proven contraindication for HBO, blood velocity \> 200 cm/sec previously measured with transcranial Doppler, previous history of stroke, patient requiring more than 2 l/min of normobaric oxygen in order to achieve an SpO2 (peripheral oxygen saturation) ≥ 92%. Patients with exclusion criteria, although precluded from the randomisation process, will however be eligible to undergo the HBOT intervention and become part of the cohort. Measurements and procedures: In all cases, included patients will receive usual care for VOC, including hydration, analgesics (patient-controlled analgesia with morphine), normobaric oxygen therapy and where medically indicated, antibiotic therapy and/or transfusions. Within 4 to 12 hours of their initial consultation at their hospital's ED, patients who have agreed to participate in the study will be randomised between the HBOT intervention group (2 Atmosphere Absolute pressure \[ATA\], 95 min, FIO2 = 1) and the placebo group (1.3 ATA, 95 min, FIO2 = 0.21). Patients will undergo a first session in the hyperbaric chamber and then return to their ward. The second (and third) session (for both groups) will systematically take place within 24 h (max. 36 h) of the first session. If the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score is ≤ 2 without the use of level 3 analgesics at the standard dosage, subsequent sessions will be cancelled. Difference in the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score before and after HBOT and other outcomes will be compared between the intervention and placebo groups. A superiority of HBOT compared placebo group in VOC should be demonstrated, with decrease of pain, length of stay and cost.

Expected results and their impact: Expected benefits of HBOT are the reduction of: pain experienced, duration of the crisis, number of transfusions required, the number of morphine doses, reduction of length of stay and reduction in the frequency of ACSs and VOCs.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sickle Cell Disease Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Vaso-occlusive Crisis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Intervention is a treatment with Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Hyperbaric chamber. Placebo is entry in hyperbaric chamber but without oxygen and with a minimal pression. Within 4 hrs (or at the latest 12 hrs) of their initial consultation at their hospital's ED, patients who have agreed to participate in the study will be randomised between the HBOT intervention group (2 ATA, 95 min, FIO2=1) and the placebo group (1.3 ATA, 95 min, FIO2=0.21). Patients undergo a first session (HBOT/placebo) in the hyperbaric chamber and then return to their ward.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
Randomisation will be double-blinded: neither the patient nor physician caring for the patient will be informed of the strategy. Only the Hyperbaric Chamber team, in charge of the session, will be informed of the treatment arm which has been attributed.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

HBOT intervention group (2 ATA, 95 min, FIO2=1)

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) is the administration of oxygen at a pressure higher than atmospheric pressure (2 ATA). By breathing pure oxygen at twice the atmospheric pressure, its concentration in the blood is multiplied by nearly ten times. This allows a greater oxygen concentration in poorly vascularised areas of the body.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

HBOT in Hyperbaric chamber

Intervention Type DEVICE

HBOT is the administration of oxygen (FIO2 = 100%) at a pressure higher than atmospheric pressure (2 ATA). The pressure increase is achieved by introducing compressed air into the hyperbaric chamber. This study will use a hyperbaric chamber that is already marketed, licensed and used in other diseases.

placebo group (1.3 ATA, 95 min, FIO2=0.21)

Hyperbaric chamber is the same chamber used for HBOT, but with a limited hyperpressure (1.3 ATA) and using ambient air (FIO2=0.21), with illusion of treatment in healthy volunteers.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Hyperbaric chamber for placebo

Intervention Type DEVICE

Hyperbaric chamber is the same chamber used for HBOT, but here with a limited hyperpressure (1.3 ATA) and using ambient air (FIO2=0.21), with illusion of treatment in healthy volunteers. All other aspects of the procedure are identical to those of the intervention. As in the intervention arm, there will be a compression period (although shorter), of 5 min, followed by 85 min at 1.3 ATA, then a decompression period of 5 min (total duration of 95 min).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HBOT in Hyperbaric chamber

HBOT is the administration of oxygen (FIO2 = 100%) at a pressure higher than atmospheric pressure (2 ATA). The pressure increase is achieved by introducing compressed air into the hyperbaric chamber. This study will use a hyperbaric chamber that is already marketed, licensed and used in other diseases.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Hyperbaric chamber for placebo

Hyperbaric chamber is the same chamber used for HBOT, but here with a limited hyperpressure (1.3 ATA) and using ambient air (FIO2=0.21), with illusion of treatment in healthy volunteers. All other aspects of the procedure are identical to those of the intervention. As in the intervention arm, there will be a compression period (although shorter), of 5 min, followed by 85 min at 1.3 ATA, then a decompression period of 5 min (total duration of 95 min).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Placebo Comparator

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aged 8 or over;
* Diagnosed with a major SCD disorder (SS, SC, Hb O Arab, Sβ0 and Sβ+ -thalassemias);
* Presentation of a Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC), with or without Acute Chest Syndrome,
* Unresponsive to level 2 analgesics (WHO classification)
* Which fulfils the criteria necessary for consultation at an ED;
* Ability to carry out the Valsalva manoeuvre;
* Ability to give informed consent and sign a written informed consent form (consent and signature of legal guardian authorised).

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy;
* Indication for artificial ventilation (non-invasive ventilation/oro-tracheal intubation);
* Proven contraindication for HBOT established by a physician responsible for hyperbaric medicine;
* Anomaly in the results of prior transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound (\> 200 cm/sec) or a previous history of stroke (but TCD will not be performed for the study);
* Patients requiring more than 2 l/min of normobaric oxygen in order to maintain an SpO2 ≥ 92%.
Minimum Eligible Age

8 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Toulouse

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospices Civils de Lyon

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Geneva

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jerome Stirnemann

Assistant Head of the Internal medicine Unit

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospices civils de Lyon

Lyon, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Centre de compétences Sd drépanocytaires

Toulouse, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

HUG

Geneva, , Switzerland

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France Switzerland

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jérôme Stirnemann, Dr

Role: CONTACT

+ 41 22 372 92 02

Jacques Serratrice, Dr

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Giovanna Cannas, MD

Role: primary

Pierre Cougoul, MD

Role: primary

jerome Stirnemann, MD

Role: primary

+41795534408

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2019-01707

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.