Necessity of Fusion Following Decompression Surgery in Patients With Single-level Lumbar Stenosis

NCT ID: NCT05273879

Last Updated: 2025-12-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

86 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-04-01

Study Completion Date

2026-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Long-term clinical results of two methods of surgical treatment (spinal decompression with or without fusion) in patients with single-level lumbar stenosis will be compared. A clear framework for surgical treatment methods and standardized postoperative rehabilitation treatment will be set to obtain the maximum homogeneity of the patient groups.

This trial should provide the first level of evidence for the need for spinal fusion in patients with single-level lumbar stenosis, subject to the high homogeneous comparison groups. Additional results will allow comparing the economic aspects of different surgical treatments for 2 years after surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The necessity of spinal segment fusion after decompression is one of the most controversial and unresolved issues in single-level lumbar spinal stenosis surgery. To date, only one trial carried out 15 years ago focused on this problem. The key purpose of the current trial is to compare the long-term clinical results of the two surgical methods (decompression vs. decompression and fusion) in patients with single-level lumbar stenosis.

This study is focused on the non-inferior clinical results of decompression compared with the standard fusion procedure. In the decompression group, the spinous process, the interspinous and supraspinous ligaments, part of the facet joints, and corresponding parts of the vertebral arch are to be preserved intact. In the fusion group, decompression is to be supplemented with transforaminal interbody fusion. Participants meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomly divided into two equal groups (1:1), depending on the surgical method. The final analysis will include 86 patients (43 per group). The primary endpoint is Oswestry Disability Index dynamics at the end of the 24-month follow-up compared to the baseline level. Secondary outcomes included those estimated using the SF-36 scale, EQ-5D-5L, and psychological scales. Additional parameters will include sagittal balance of the spine, fusion results, total cost of surgery, and hospital stay followed by two-year treatment. Follow-up examinations will be performed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months Authors suggest that this study will improve the evidence for application of various surgical techniques for lumbar spine stenosis surgery and verify the existing protocol for surgical management.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Spinal Stenosis Spinal Fusion

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

lumbar spine lumbar fusion laminotomy decompression without fusion lumbar stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

decompression group

minimally invasive decompression without fusion

Group Type OTHER

decompression

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

laminotomy of the corresponding adjacent vertebrae, partial flavectomy and medial facetectomy are planned to be performed unilaterally. Depending on the surgeon's personal preferences, the following two options are available: 1) equivalent decompression procedure contralaterally and 2) crossover contralateral decompression. Irrespective of the selected option, the spinous process, the interspinous and supraspinous ligaments, part of the facet joints, and the corresponding part of the vertebral arch must be preserved intact in all participants.

fusion group

minimally invasive decompression with trans-foraminal interbody fusion

Group Type OTHER

fusion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

First, decompression is performed according to one of the above methods. Next, trans-foraminal interbody fusion with a cage (TLIF) and fixation with pedicle screws are performed.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

decompression

laminotomy of the corresponding adjacent vertebrae, partial flavectomy and medial facetectomy are planned to be performed unilaterally. Depending on the surgeon's personal preferences, the following two options are available: 1) equivalent decompression procedure contralaterally and 2) crossover contralateral decompression. Irrespective of the selected option, the spinous process, the interspinous and supraspinous ligaments, part of the facet joints, and the corresponding part of the vertebral arch must be preserved intact in all participants.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

fusion

First, decompression is performed according to one of the above methods. Next, trans-foraminal interbody fusion with a cage (TLIF) and fixation with pedicle screws are performed.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age of patients from 45 to 75 years;
* stenosis C or D according to Shizas et al. according to MRI at the level of L2-L3, L3-L4, L4-L5 or L5-S1;
* clinical manifestations of lumbar stenosis (neurogenic claudication syndrome and/or radiculopathy);
* lack of effect from conservative therapy within 3 months;
* Informed consent to take part in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* spondylolisthesis more than 3 mm;
* spinal instability according to functional radiography;
* sagittal imbalance (type 4 according to C. Barrey);
* bone density of the vertebrae at the level of the operation is less than 100 HU;
* clinically significant spinal stenosis at 2 or more levels;
* previously performed surgeries on the spine;
* risk of anesthesia 4 or 5 according to ASA;
* inability to take part in control examinations within 2 years after the operation;
* participation in other clinical trials related to surgical or conservative treatment of diseases of the spine.
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pirogov National Medical Surgical Center

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Moscow Scientific and Practical Center of Medical Rehabilitation, Restorative and Sports Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sklifosovsky Institute of Emergency Care

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ivan Lvov, MD, PhD

Senior fellow

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrey Grin, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center

Moscow, Moscow, Russia

Site Status RECRUITING

Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine

Moscow, Moscow, Russia

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Russia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ivan Lvov, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +79265760074

Email: [email protected]

Anton Kordonskiy, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +79265724547

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Valeriy Lebedev, MD, PhD

Role: primary

Ivan Lvov, MD, PhD

Role: primary

Anton Kordonskiy, MD, PhD

Role: backup

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Grin A, Lvov I, Talypov A, Smirnov V, Kordonskiy A, Lebedev V, Zuev A, Senko I, Pogonchenkova I, Krylov V. Necessity of fusion following decompression surgery in patients with single-level lumbar stenosis: study protocol for an open-label multicentre non-inferiority randomized controlled clinical trial. Trials. 2023 Jul 10;24(1):451. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07486-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37430281 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

03\2022

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id