Remedy to Diabetes Distress (R2D2): A Scalable Screen to Treat Program for School-age Families

NCT ID: NCT05268250

Last Updated: 2025-10-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

180 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-02-26

Study Completion Date

2026-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This R01 is in response to RFA-DK-19-021, Treating Diabetes Distress to Improve Glycemic Outcomes in Type 1 Diabetes. The objective is to test the feasibility and acceptability of a novel, practical, and potentially scalable screen to treat program for diabetes distress in families of school-age children with T1D (called Remedy to Diabetes Distress \[R2D2\]) and to test the initial efficacy of R2D2 to reduce diabetes distress to improve children's glycemic control.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Only 22% of school-age children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) achieve an HbA1c of \<7.5% while the majority of school-age children who exceed this target are at higher risk for T1D-related complications. Achieving optimal T1D self-care is the only direct pathway to better HbA1c and even with the addition of modern therapeutic modalities (e.g., hybrid closed loop), it is a complex, time-consuming, and relentless task. School-age children cannot effectively manage T1D alone and require help from their parents to participate in daily T1D self-care. The research suggests that both parents and youth with T1D are vulnerable to Diabetes Distress (DD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Standards of Care recommend ongoing assessment of DD in youth (starting at 7-8-years-old) and their caregiver during routine diabetes clinic visits. Unfortunately, while DD screening may be an ADA Care Standard, there are no practical treatment options for clinics to adopt to treat DD in school-age families in the case of positive screens. The researchers submit this new R01 in response to RFA-DK-19-021, Treating Diabetes Distress to Improve Glycemic Outcomes in Type 1 Diabetes. Our objective is to test the feasibility and acceptability of a novel, practical, and potentially scalable screen to treat program for DD in families of school-age children with T1D (called Remedy to Diabetes Distress \[R2D2\]) and to test the initial efficacy of R2D2 to reduce DD to improve children's glycemic control. To enhance scientific rigor, the researchers plan to use the ORBIT model for behavioral intervention development to guide the study design. The specific aims are: 1) Define feasibility and acceptability of our new screen to treat program (R2D2) for DD in school-age families, and 2) Establish initial efficacy of R2D2 to reduce parent and child DD to improve child glycemic control. The researchers propose to address these Aims through an iterative process and multiple projects to complete the necessary formative research to design, build, and prepare to implement R2D2. The researchers then propose to complete a Pilot randomized controlled trial of their R2D2 screen to treat program, testing for its initial efficacy based on child HbA1c and time in range (primary outcomes) and parent and child DD and resilience, and T1D self-care (secondary outcomes; Phase 2b: Pilot, n=180). The impact of the proposed R01 is high because it addresses a critical need for practical and evidence-based solutions for screening and treating DD in families of school-age children, heretofore an understudied patient subgroup. The researchers believe our study optimally responds to the FOA because the research team is multidisciplinary (anchored by a partnership between behavioral science and diabetology), and their R2D2 screen to treat program reflects a practical team approach that can realistically occur in clinic and scale to other centers.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 1 Diabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

R2D2 mHealth treatment for diabetes distress

This is a mHealth supported, cognitive behavioral treatment for parents and school-age children who were identified with clinically relevant levels of diabetes distress as part of a clinic screening program

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

R2D2 mHealth intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

R2D2 mHealth treatment will use cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness, and behavioral activation strategies

Standard Care Control

Parents and school-age children who were identified with clinically relevant levels of diabetes distress as part of a clinic screening program will receive local resources (print or electronic).

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

R2D2 mHealth intervention

R2D2 mHealth treatment will use cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness, and behavioral activation strategies

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* child age between 8-12 years, physician confirmed T1D diagnosis,
* either the child or the parent or both the child and parent report diabetes distress levels at or above clinical cut-points,
* child is on an intensive insulin regimen (pump or MDI).

Exclusion Criteria

* children on a conventional insulin regimen, children and/or parents who do not report diabetes distress levels at or above the clinical cut-points,
* children who have an allergy or sensitivity to the adhesive and/or skin preparation used for CGM, children with a comorbid chronic condition (e.g., renal disease),
* children and parents who do not speak English.
Minimum Eligible Age

8 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Nemours Children's Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Susana Patton

Principal Research Scientist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Susana R Patton, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Nemours Children's Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nemours Children's Health

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Children's Mercy Kansas City

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Susana R Patton, PhD

Role: CONTACT

9046972000

Nicole Morales

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Susana R Patton, PhD

Role: primary

9136973595

Amy Milkes

Role: backup

Mark Clements, MD PHD

Role: primary

8162343000

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1687888

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

TRE in Type 2 Diabetes (See Food Study 3)
NCT05290246 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Type 1 Diabetes Education and Support Study
NCT05735340 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA