Negative Pressure Wound Therapy-PICO: Cosmesis in Repeat C-Sections

NCT ID: NCT05266053

Last Updated: 2024-09-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-07-28

Study Completion Date

2023-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There are millions of births each year with 32% of women undergoing cesarean sections (C-sections), which results in skin scarring. Repeat C-sections increased by 178% from 1979-2010. Given the frequency of C-sections, it is important to achieve a desirable cosmetic outcome.

The PICO 7 dressing consists of a negative pressure wound therapy pump (NPWT) connected to an absorbent gentle adhesive dressing that is applied to a wound. When the pump is activated, it acts by pulling excess fluid from the wound. The dressing absorbs this fluid and helps to prevent bacteria from entering the wound. It has been shown to prevent wound infections and promote healing. This study aims to compare the aesthetic appearance by using The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) scar assessment scale following closed incision negative pressure therapy with a PICO 7 dressing to the standard abdominal dressing in women undergoing repeat cesarean sections

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Single, randomized controlled trial in women undergoing a repeat cesarean delivery. Women will be randomized to placement of a PICO 7 dressing or a standard abdominal dressing at the time of cesarean. The standard abdominal dressing will be removed approximately on postoperative day (POD) 1-2 and the PICO 7 dressing will be removed approximately on POD 3-4 (prior to discharge). If the patient with a PICO dressing remains inpatient for longer than 7 postoperative days, the PICO dressing will be removed prior to POD 7, in accordance with device instructions. Participants in both groups will be sent POSAS surveys at the two, four and six week visit window with primary outcome being aesthetic appearance (cosmesis) at six weeks. Observers (healthcare providers) will complete a POSAS survey at the postpartum visit (\~4-6 weeks postoperative) to rate scar quality.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypertrophic Skin Condition of Anterior Abdomen

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Women will be randomized to placement of a PICO 7 dressing or a standard abdominal dressing at the time of cesarean. The standard abdominal dressing will be removed approximately on postoperative day (POD) 1-2 and the PICO 7 dressing will be removed approximately on POD 3-4 (prior to discharge). If the patient with a PICO dressing remains inpatient for longer than 7 postoperative days, the PICO dressing will be removed prior to POD 7, in accordance with device instructions. Participants in both groups will be sent POSAS surveys at the two, four and six week visit window with primary outcome being aesthetic appearance (cosmesis) at six weeks. Observers (healthcare providers) will complete a POSAS survey at the postpartum visit (\~4-6 weeks postoperative) to rate scar quality.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment Group

This group will have a PICO negative pressure wound treatment device applied to their surgical wound site.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PICO 7 dressing

Intervention Type DEVICE

The PICO 7 dressing consists of a negative pressure wound therapy pump (NPWT) connected to an absorbent gentle adhesive dressing that is applied to a wound. When the pump is activated, it acts by pulling excess fluid from the wound. The dressing absorbs this fluid and helps to prevent bacteria from entering the wound. It has been shown to prevent wound infections and promote healing.

Control Group

Standard Intervention. This group will have a standard wound dressing (gauze, bandage) applied to their surgical wound site.

Group Type OTHER

Standard wound dressing

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard abdominal dressing at the time of cesarean

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PICO 7 dressing

The PICO 7 dressing consists of a negative pressure wound therapy pump (NPWT) connected to an absorbent gentle adhesive dressing that is applied to a wound. When the pump is activated, it acts by pulling excess fluid from the wound. The dressing absorbs this fluid and helps to prevent bacteria from entering the wound. It has been shown to prevent wound infections and promote healing.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard wound dressing

Standard abdominal dressing at the time of cesarean

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Scheduled or non-labor repeat cesarean delivery
* One or more prior cesarean section(s) with prior pfannenstiel incision scar
* Gestational age \> 23 weeks
* Age 18 and older

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with malignancy in the wound bed or margins of the wound
* Non-enteric and unexplored fistulas
* Necrotic tissue with eschar present
* Exposed arteries, veins, nerves or organs
* Exposed anastomotic sites
* Cellulitis or evidence of active infection
* Known allergy to adhesive tape
* Patient unwilling to follow-up
* Contraindication to NPWT

* Bleeding disorder
* Therapeutic anticoagulation
* Allergy to any component of the dressing (perhaps list these as you will need to know to confirm eligibility of each patient)
* Prior irradiated skin
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Indiana University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lisa Annette Mims

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lisa Mims, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Indiana University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Eskenazi Hospital

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Brown BC, Moss TP, McGrouther DA, Bayat A. Skin scar preconceptions must be challenged: importance of self-perception in skin scarring. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Jun;63(6):1022-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.03.019. Epub 2009 Jun 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19501559 (View on PubMed)

Figueroa D, Jauk VC, Szychowski JM, Garner R, Biggio JR, Andrews WW, Hauth J, Tita AT. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;121(1):33-8. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31827a072c.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23262925 (View on PubMed)

Hyldig N, Birke-Sorensen H, Kruse M, Vinter C, Joergensen JS, Sorensen JA, Mogensen O, Lamont RF, Bille C. Meta-analysis of negative-pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions. Br J Surg. 2016 Apr;103(5):477-86. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10084.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26994715 (View on PubMed)

Hyldig N, Vinter CA, Kruse M, Mogensen O, Bille C, Sorensen JA, Lamont RF, Wu C, Heidemann LN, Ibsen MH, Laursen JB, Ovesen PG, Rorbye C, Tanvig M, Joergensen JS. Prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy reduces the risk of surgical site infection after caesarean section in obese women: a pragmatic randomised clinical trial. BJOG. 2019 Apr;126(5):628-635. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15413. Epub 2018 Sep 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30066454 (View on PubMed)

Ekin M, Dagdeviren H, Caypinar SS, Erdogan B, Ayag ME, Cengiz H, Yasar L, Helvacioglu C. Comparative cosmetic outcome of surgical incisions created by the PEAK Plasma Blade and a scalpel after cesarean section by Patient and Observer Assessment Scale (POSAS): A randomized double blind study. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;57(1):68-70. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2017.12.011.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29458906 (View on PubMed)

Truong PT, Lee JC, Soer B, Gaul CA, Olivotto IA. Reliability and validity testing of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in evaluating linear scars after breast cancer surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Feb;119(2):487-94. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000252949.77525.bc.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17230080 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2008549700

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pilonidal Disease Wound Healing Study
NCT01857128 UNKNOWN PHASE4
Dyed vs. Undyed Polyglactin Sutures in Cutaneous Surgery
NCT07078669 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA