Negative Pressure Wound Therapy-PICO: Cosmesis in Repeat C-Sections
NCT ID: NCT05266053
Last Updated: 2024-09-03
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-07-28
2023-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The PICO 7 dressing consists of a negative pressure wound therapy pump (NPWT) connected to an absorbent gentle adhesive dressing that is applied to a wound. When the pump is activated, it acts by pulling excess fluid from the wound. The dressing absorbs this fluid and helps to prevent bacteria from entering the wound. It has been shown to prevent wound infections and promote healing. This study aims to compare the aesthetic appearance by using The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) scar assessment scale following closed incision negative pressure therapy with a PICO 7 dressing to the standard abdominal dressing in women undergoing repeat cesarean sections
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy to Prevent Wound Complications Following Cesarean Section in High Risk Patients
NCT03082664
PICO Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Obese Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Delivery.
NCT03414762
Prophylactic Incisional Care in Obese Women at Cesarean
NCT02578745
Prevention of Wound Complications After Cesarean Delivery in Obese Women Utilizing Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
NCT00654641
PINTA - Prophylactic Incisional Negative Pressure Therapy for Major Amputations
NCT06025253
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment Group
This group will have a PICO negative pressure wound treatment device applied to their surgical wound site.
PICO 7 dressing
The PICO 7 dressing consists of a negative pressure wound therapy pump (NPWT) connected to an absorbent gentle adhesive dressing that is applied to a wound. When the pump is activated, it acts by pulling excess fluid from the wound. The dressing absorbs this fluid and helps to prevent bacteria from entering the wound. It has been shown to prevent wound infections and promote healing.
Control Group
Standard Intervention. This group will have a standard wound dressing (gauze, bandage) applied to their surgical wound site.
Standard wound dressing
Standard abdominal dressing at the time of cesarean
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PICO 7 dressing
The PICO 7 dressing consists of a negative pressure wound therapy pump (NPWT) connected to an absorbent gentle adhesive dressing that is applied to a wound. When the pump is activated, it acts by pulling excess fluid from the wound. The dressing absorbs this fluid and helps to prevent bacteria from entering the wound. It has been shown to prevent wound infections and promote healing.
Standard wound dressing
Standard abdominal dressing at the time of cesarean
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* One or more prior cesarean section(s) with prior pfannenstiel incision scar
* Gestational age \> 23 weeks
* Age 18 and older
Exclusion Criteria
* Non-enteric and unexplored fistulas
* Necrotic tissue with eschar present
* Exposed arteries, veins, nerves or organs
* Exposed anastomotic sites
* Cellulitis or evidence of active infection
* Known allergy to adhesive tape
* Patient unwilling to follow-up
* Contraindication to NPWT
* Bleeding disorder
* Therapeutic anticoagulation
* Allergy to any component of the dressing (perhaps list these as you will need to know to confirm eligibility of each patient)
* Prior irradiated skin
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Indiana University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lisa Annette Mims
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lisa Mims, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Indiana University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Eskenazi Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Brown BC, Moss TP, McGrouther DA, Bayat A. Skin scar preconceptions must be challenged: importance of self-perception in skin scarring. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Jun;63(6):1022-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.03.019. Epub 2009 Jun 5.
Figueroa D, Jauk VC, Szychowski JM, Garner R, Biggio JR, Andrews WW, Hauth J, Tita AT. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;121(1):33-8. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31827a072c.
Hyldig N, Birke-Sorensen H, Kruse M, Vinter C, Joergensen JS, Sorensen JA, Mogensen O, Lamont RF, Bille C. Meta-analysis of negative-pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions. Br J Surg. 2016 Apr;103(5):477-86. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10084.
Hyldig N, Vinter CA, Kruse M, Mogensen O, Bille C, Sorensen JA, Lamont RF, Wu C, Heidemann LN, Ibsen MH, Laursen JB, Ovesen PG, Rorbye C, Tanvig M, Joergensen JS. Prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy reduces the risk of surgical site infection after caesarean section in obese women: a pragmatic randomised clinical trial. BJOG. 2019 Apr;126(5):628-635. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15413. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
Ekin M, Dagdeviren H, Caypinar SS, Erdogan B, Ayag ME, Cengiz H, Yasar L, Helvacioglu C. Comparative cosmetic outcome of surgical incisions created by the PEAK Plasma Blade and a scalpel after cesarean section by Patient and Observer Assessment Scale (POSAS): A randomized double blind study. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;57(1):68-70. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2017.12.011.
Truong PT, Lee JC, Soer B, Gaul CA, Olivotto IA. Reliability and validity testing of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in evaluating linear scars after breast cancer surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Feb;119(2):487-94. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000252949.77525.bc.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2008549700
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.