Comparison of Single Port and Two Ports Robotic Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Thymectomy

NCT ID: NCT05262582

Last Updated: 2022-05-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-05-10

Study Completion Date

2025-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Recently, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has become into as an alternative approach to either, open surgery or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. The superiorities of RATS have been reported in series studies, such as intuitive movements, tremor filtration, more degrees of manipulative freedom, motion scaling, and high-definition stereoscopic vision.

However, the currently reported robotic thymectomy used 3 ports. Theoretically, less incisions may bring faster postoperative recovery, lighter postoperative pain and higher postoperative quality of life. The investigators have successfully performed robotic thymectomy through 2 ports and even 1 port. However, the potential benefit of less ports robotic thymectomy has not been verified through well-designed cohort study, so this clinical trial has been designed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The gold standard technique for thymectomy used to be transsternal approach. Advancements in modern technology bring many evolutions in minimally invasive surgery such as Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) thymectomy gained popularity after 2000s. Recently, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has become into as an alternative approach to either, open surgery or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. The superiorities of RATS have been reported in series studies, such as intuitive movements, tremor filtration, more degrees of manipulative freedom, motion scaling, and high-definition stereoscopic vision.

However, the currently reported robotic thymectomy used 3 ports. Theoretically, less incisions may bring faster postoperative recovery, lighter postoperative pain and higher postoperative quality of life. The investigators have successfully performed robotic thymectomy through 2 ports and even 1 port. However, the potential benefit of less ports robotic thymectomy has not been verified through well-designed cohort study, so this clinical trial has been designed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Thymoma Myasthenia Gravis Associated With Thymoma Thymectomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Thymectomy performed with sigle port RATS

The incision is performed in the 5-6th intercostal space under the breast folds without violating the mammalian tissue. This port is used for the camera and both arms simultaneously.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sigle port RATS

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The incision is performed in the 5-6th intercostal space under the breast folds without violating the mammalian tissue. This port is used for the camera and both arms simultaneously.

Thymectomy performed with two ports RATS

The incision is performed in the 4th intercostal space along anterior axillary fossa, for the camera and left arm. The other incision is subxiphoid longitudinal incision about 4cm for the right arm.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Two ports RATS

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The incision is performed in the 4th intercostal space along anterior axillary fossa, for the camera and left arm. The other incision is subxiphoid longitudinal incision about 4cm for the right arm.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sigle port RATS

The incision is performed in the 5-6th intercostal space under the breast folds without violating the mammalian tissue. This port is used for the camera and both arms simultaneously.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Two ports RATS

The incision is performed in the 4th intercostal space along anterior axillary fossa, for the camera and left arm. The other incision is subxiphoid longitudinal incision about 4cm for the right arm.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients with Myasthenia Gravis and(or) thymoma need to perform thymectomy.
2. Agree to accept Robotic Assisted Thoracic Surgery and have signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Cardiopulmonary function cannot tolerate thoracoscopic surgery or exist other contraindication.
2. Thymic carcinoma.
3. Thoracic deformity.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lei Jiang

principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

lei jiang, doctor

Role: CONTACT

+8613917912348

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

lei jiang, doctor

Role: primary

13917912348

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Peng M, Wang X, Chen C, Tan S, Liu W, Yu F. Report on 153 sequential three-incision robotic-assisted pulmonary resections by a single surgeon: technical details and learning curve. J Thorac Dis. 2020 Mar;12(3):741-748. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.116.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32274140 (View on PubMed)

Kaba E, Cosgun T, Ayalp K, Alomari MR, Toker A. Robotic thymectomy-a new approach for thymus. J Vis Surg. 2017 May 8;3:67. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2017.03.28. eCollection 2017.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29078630 (View on PubMed)

Curcio C, Scaramuzzi R, Amore D. Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery thymectomy. J Vis Surg. 2017 Nov 7;3:162. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2017.10.01. eCollection 2017.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29302438 (View on PubMed)

Luzzi L, Corzani R, Ghisalberti M, Meniconi F, De Leonibus L, Molinaro F, Paladini P. Robotic surgery vs. open surgery for thymectomy, a retrospective case-match study. J Robot Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):375-379. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01109-z. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32632562 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

jianglei4

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

EFG vs IVIG in TAMG
NCT07231523 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE3