Comparison of Single Port and Two Ports Robotic Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Thymectomy
NCT ID: NCT05262582
Last Updated: 2022-05-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-05-10
2025-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
However, the currently reported robotic thymectomy used 3 ports. Theoretically, less incisions may bring faster postoperative recovery, lighter postoperative pain and higher postoperative quality of life. The investigators have successfully performed robotic thymectomy through 2 ports and even 1 port. However, the potential benefit of less ports robotic thymectomy has not been verified through well-designed cohort study, so this clinical trial has been designed.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Robot-assisted vs VATS for Thymoma
NCT06029621
RATT Vs. VATT for Early-stage TETs
NCT06654830
Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Thymectomy Versus Subxiphoid Procedure
NCT04223466
Influence of Minimally Invasive Thymectomy on the Subsequent Clinical Course of Myasthenia Gravis
NCT04158661
The Safety and Efficacy of "3-Hole" Subxiphorid Approach in the Treatment of Anterior Mediastinal Tumor
NCT02317224
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
However, the currently reported robotic thymectomy used 3 ports. Theoretically, less incisions may bring faster postoperative recovery, lighter postoperative pain and higher postoperative quality of life. The investigators have successfully performed robotic thymectomy through 2 ports and even 1 port. However, the potential benefit of less ports robotic thymectomy has not been verified through well-designed cohort study, so this clinical trial has been designed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Thymectomy performed with sigle port RATS
The incision is performed in the 5-6th intercostal space under the breast folds without violating the mammalian tissue. This port is used for the camera and both arms simultaneously.
Sigle port RATS
The incision is performed in the 5-6th intercostal space under the breast folds without violating the mammalian tissue. This port is used for the camera and both arms simultaneously.
Thymectomy performed with two ports RATS
The incision is performed in the 4th intercostal space along anterior axillary fossa, for the camera and left arm. The other incision is subxiphoid longitudinal incision about 4cm for the right arm.
Two ports RATS
The incision is performed in the 4th intercostal space along anterior axillary fossa, for the camera and left arm. The other incision is subxiphoid longitudinal incision about 4cm for the right arm.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sigle port RATS
The incision is performed in the 5-6th intercostal space under the breast folds without violating the mammalian tissue. This port is used for the camera and both arms simultaneously.
Two ports RATS
The incision is performed in the 4th intercostal space along anterior axillary fossa, for the camera and left arm. The other incision is subxiphoid longitudinal incision about 4cm for the right arm.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Agree to accept Robotic Assisted Thoracic Surgery and have signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Thymic carcinoma.
3. Thoracic deformity.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lei Jiang
principal investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Peng M, Wang X, Chen C, Tan S, Liu W, Yu F. Report on 153 sequential three-incision robotic-assisted pulmonary resections by a single surgeon: technical details and learning curve. J Thorac Dis. 2020 Mar;12(3):741-748. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.116.
Kaba E, Cosgun T, Ayalp K, Alomari MR, Toker A. Robotic thymectomy-a new approach for thymus. J Vis Surg. 2017 May 8;3:67. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2017.03.28. eCollection 2017.
Curcio C, Scaramuzzi R, Amore D. Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery thymectomy. J Vis Surg. 2017 Nov 7;3:162. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2017.10.01. eCollection 2017.
Luzzi L, Corzani R, Ghisalberti M, Meniconi F, De Leonibus L, Molinaro F, Paladini P. Robotic surgery vs. open surgery for thymectomy, a retrospective case-match study. J Robot Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):375-379. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01109-z. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
jianglei4
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.