Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Patients With Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms
NCT ID: NCT05259384
Last Updated: 2022-02-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-04-17
2024-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Here we design this prospective randomized clinical trial to compare robotic surgery to laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of PCN and verify the safety and feasibility of both two minimally invasive procedures.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Based on the conventional routine treatment, open pancreaticoduodenectomy or open distal pancreatectomy was performed for patients with PCN locates either at the head or tail.
After more than 20 years of development, minimally invasive pancreatic surgery technology can be divided into two categories: laparoscopic technology and Da Vinci robotic technology. In general, compared with open surgery, minimally invasive pancreatic surgery technology can avoid some open procedures limitations, reduce the loss of intraoperative body fluid and its impact on the internal environment, and avoid excessive disturbance to other abdominal organs. It also helps reduce the pain of patients and shorten the length of hospital stay. Because most PCNs are benign or borderline tumors, such patients are eligible for minimally invasive pancreatic surgery.
Aim and Hypothesis: Here we design this prospective randomized clinical trial to compare robotic surgery to laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of PCN and verify the safety and feasibility of both two minimally invasive procedures. We conduct a single-center prospective randomized clinical trial to compare the outcomes of different minimally invasive techniques.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MIPD-ROB
Patients with PCN locates HEAD and NECK of pancreas who were randomized to ROBOTIC pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy
The Intervention of MIPD-ROB group
MIPD-LAP
Patients with PCN locates HEAD and NECK of pancreas who were randomized to LAPAROSCOPIC pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy
The Intervention of MIPD-LAP group
MIDP-ROB
Patients with PCN locates BODY and TAIL of pancreas who were randomized to ROBOTIC distal pancreatectomy.
Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy
The Intervention of MIDP-ROB group
MIDP-LAP
Patients with PCN locates BODY and TAIL of pancreas who were randomized to LAPAROSCOPIC distal pancreatectomy.
Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy
The Intervention of MIDP-LAP group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy
The Intervention of MIPD-ROB group
Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy
The Intervention of MIPD-LAP group
Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy
The Intervention of MIDP-ROB group
Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy
The Intervention of MIDP-LAP group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Diagnosed as PCN;
3. Patients with head or neck PCNs are eligible for minimal invasive PD, or patients with distal PCNs are eligible for minimal invasive DP.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Procedure change from MIDP/MIPD to others during the operation;
3. ASA more than 4;
4. Patients or families deny certain treatment.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
MENGHUA Dai, M.D.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
Beijing, , China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Menghua Dai, M.D.
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Daimh-ROBOTIC-PCN
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id