Infective Endocarditis Surgery Using Conventional Prosthetic Valves Versus Cryopreserved Aortic Homograft

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Total Enrollment

760 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-01-01

Study Completion Date

2026-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

: Evidence suggested that autologous or allogeneic tissue is more suitable to synthetic material in an infected field. Given the unwillingness of some surgeons to use artificial foreign materials, such as conventional mechanical or stent xenograft valve prostheses, cryopreserved aortic homografts (CAH) have been recommended revealing favorable outcomes in aortic valve endocarditis (AVE) surgery (1-5). This aspect is even more evident in cases involving prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) and other complex and aggressive lesions involving the aortic root and intervalvular fibrosa with abscess formation. However, most of these reports are fixed on single-arm observational studies without comparing CAH with conventional prostheses.

The key question of this study is to establish the difference in treatment failure (death, recurrent aortic valve regurgitation and reoperation), all-cause and cause-specific (cardiac vs noncardiac) mortality, hospitalizations for heart failure during follow-up (structural/non structural valve deterioration, thromboembolism and recurrent endocarditis) in patients who received the CAH vs conventional mechanical or stent xenograft valve prostheses for aortic valve replacement (AVR) secondary to infective endocarditis (IE)

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Standard Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

NCT05261204

Prosthesis Survival Prosthesis; Cardiac, Heart, Functional Disturbance as Result

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Comparative Analysis of Stented Biological Prosthesis Versus Aortic Allograft in Patients With Degenerative Aortic Valve Disease

NCT07210541

Bioprosthesis Failure Allograft

COMPLETED

Aortic Root Enlargement Versus Aortic Root Replacement in the Management of Cases With Small Aortic Root

NCT05167539

Aortic Valve Disease

UNKNOWN

Comparison of Self- and Balloon-expandable Valves in Patients With Ascending Aortic Dilation Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The AAD-CHOICE

NCT06009588

Aortic Stenosis Ascending Aortic Dilatation

RECRUITING NA

Transapical Transcatheter Treatment Versus Conventional Surgery in Patients With Native Aortic Valve Stenosis

NCT00986193

Aortic Valve Stenosis

TERMINATED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The target population enrolled in the study includes patients with aortic-valve endocarditis at risk of embolization, heart failure and uncontrolled infection undergoing AVR with the use of CAH or conventional mechanical or stent xenograft valve prostheses. Individuals were adequately treated per applicable standards, including for the treatment of infection, LV dysfunction and heart failure. Patients enrolled in the studies were NYHA functional class II, III, or outpatient NYHA IV.

Three groups of patients are included in the study. Patients who were managed with CAH, patients who received AVR with conventional stented xenograft and recipients of AVR undergoing surgery with the use of mechanical prostheses.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infective Endocarditis Heart Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cryopreserved Aortic Homograft

Include patients who received CAH for native (NVE) or prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE).

The CAH are implanted using miniroot procedure. For extended aortic valve infection, aortic root replacement and reconstruction of regional contiguity is the recommended approach. Complicated aortic IE may present with destruction of a large portion of the aortic annulus, annular abscess and colonization of infected foci in contiguous cardiac structures (eg. Aortic root and intervalvular fibrosa).

Use of homograft in first time aortic valve replacement for IE decreased over time (9,4% to 5,6%) and in reoperation (37,5% to 28,5%) in a report from STS database between 2005-2011 (6). Nevertheless, the homograft was used more often in reoperations than in primary interventions (32.2% vs 7.0%, p \< 0.0001) in both valve replacements (14,6%) and for root replacements (53,2%) (6).

Cryopreserved Aortic Homograft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

CAH is used for aortic root reconstruction and for repair of mitro-aortic curtain (emicommando procedure) and it is inserted as miniroot . In cases of PVE the infected prosthesis is removed with aggressive debridement of all infected and necrotic tissue. (7)The coronary ostia are prepared for reconstruction of aortic root. In complex valve endocarditis involving aortic and mitral valve a double homograft may be used.Mitro-aortic endocarditis intervalvular fibrosa is largely involved.The abscess cavity is precisely bounded and debrided. and a double homograft is used for the reconstruction (commando procedure

Stented/Non stented xenograft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The insertion of stented/non stented xenograft may be performed using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Biological valves may be implated alone or combined with polyester or pericardial patch when reconstruction of annulus is required. In cases of aggressive lesions requiring root and /or intervalvular fibrosa reconstruction the choice of prosthetic bioroot using bioprosthetic valve is considered acceptable alternatives to CAH although it should be guided by the surgeon's experience

Mechanical prostheses

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The insertion of conventional mechanical valves may be performed using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Mechanical prostheses may be implated alone or combined with polyester or pericardial patch when reconstruction of annulus is required. In cases of aggressive lesions requiring root and /or intervalvular fibrosa reconstruction the choice of prosthetic valved conduit with a mechanical valve is considered acceptable alternatives to CAH although it should be guided by the surgeon's experience

Stented/Non stented xenograft

Stented/Non stented xenograft may be inserted using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. The use of biological valves increased from 57% to 67% for primary the operation during which the use of mechanical valves decreased from 30% to 24%. For reoperations, the use of biologic valves increased from 38% to 52% compared to the warning use of mechanical valves from 20% to 17%. A homograft was used in only 2.5% of valve replacements, while a biological valve was used in 68.7% of the cases. This trend is reversed both in NVE and PVE the aortic root was involved (6). In the presence of peri-annular abscess formation and mitro-aortic discontinuity, conventional stented /non stented xenograft are used in combination with synthetic patch for both NVE and PVE.

Cryopreserved Aortic Homograft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

CAH is used for aortic root reconstruction and for repair of mitro-aortic curtain (emicommando procedure) and it is inserted as miniroot . In cases of PVE the infected prosthesis is removed with aggressive debridement of all infected and necrotic tissue. (7)The coronary ostia are prepared for reconstruction of aortic root. In complex valve endocarditis involving aortic and mitral valve a double homograft may be used.Mitro-aortic endocarditis intervalvular fibrosa is largely involved.The abscess cavity is precisely bounded and debrided. and a double homograft is used for the reconstruction (commando procedure

Stented/Non stented xenograft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The insertion of stented/non stented xenograft may be performed using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Biological valves may be implated alone or combined with polyester or pericardial patch when reconstruction of annulus is required. In cases of aggressive lesions requiring root and /or intervalvular fibrosa reconstruction the choice of prosthetic bioroot using bioprosthetic valve is considered acceptable alternatives to CAH although it should be guided by the surgeon's experience

Mechanical prostheses

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The insertion of conventional mechanical valves may be performed using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Mechanical prostheses may be implated alone or combined with polyester or pericardial patch when reconstruction of annulus is required. In cases of aggressive lesions requiring root and /or intervalvular fibrosa reconstruction the choice of prosthetic valved conduit with a mechanical valve is considered acceptable alternatives to CAH although it should be guided by the surgeon's experience

Mechanical valve prostheses

Mechanical prostheses may be inserted using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Prior to 2000, mechanical valves were used in 50% of patients compared to 14% since 2009. Analysis of the STS Database (6) showed that from 2005 to 2011 a progressive shift in favour of biological valves both as the primary operation (NVE) (73%) and in the reoperation (PVE) (27%) compared to mechanical prosthesis. For extended aortic valve infection, aortic root replacement and reconstruction of regional contiguity is the recommended approach. Complicated aortic IE may present with destruction of a large portion of the aortic annulus, annular abscess and colonization of infected foci in contiguous cardiac structures (eg. aortic root and intervalvular fibrosa). In the presence of peri-annular abscess formation and mitro-aortic discontinuity, conventional mechanical prostheses are used in combination with synthetic patch for both NVE and PVE

Cryopreserved Aortic Homograft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

CAH is used for aortic root reconstruction and for repair of mitro-aortic curtain (emicommando procedure) and it is inserted as miniroot . In cases of PVE the infected prosthesis is removed with aggressive debridement of all infected and necrotic tissue. (7)The coronary ostia are prepared for reconstruction of aortic root. In complex valve endocarditis involving aortic and mitral valve a double homograft may be used.Mitro-aortic endocarditis intervalvular fibrosa is largely involved.The abscess cavity is precisely bounded and debrided. and a double homograft is used for the reconstruction (commando procedure

Stented/Non stented xenograft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The insertion of stented/non stented xenograft may be performed using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Biological valves may be implated alone or combined with polyester or pericardial patch when reconstruction of annulus is required. In cases of aggressive lesions requiring root and /or intervalvular fibrosa reconstruction the choice of prosthetic bioroot using bioprosthetic valve is considered acceptable alternatives to CAH although it should be guided by the surgeon's experience

Mechanical prostheses

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The insertion of conventional mechanical valves may be performed using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Mechanical prostheses may be implated alone or combined with polyester or pericardial patch when reconstruction of annulus is required. In cases of aggressive lesions requiring root and /or intervalvular fibrosa reconstruction the choice of prosthetic valved conduit with a mechanical valve is considered acceptable alternatives to CAH although it should be guided by the surgeon's experience

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cryopreserved Aortic Homograft

CAH is used for aortic root reconstruction and for repair of mitro-aortic curtain (emicommando procedure) and it is inserted as miniroot . In cases of PVE the infected prosthesis is removed with aggressive debridement of all infected and necrotic tissue. (7)The coronary ostia are prepared for reconstruction of aortic root. In complex valve endocarditis involving aortic and mitral valve a double homograft may be used.Mitro-aortic endocarditis intervalvular fibrosa is largely involved.The abscess cavity is precisely bounded and debrided. and a double homograft is used for the reconstruction (commando procedure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Stented/Non stented xenograft

The insertion of stented/non stented xenograft may be performed using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Biological valves may be implated alone or combined with polyester or pericardial patch when reconstruction of annulus is required. In cases of aggressive lesions requiring root and /or intervalvular fibrosa reconstruction the choice of prosthetic bioroot using bioprosthetic valve is considered acceptable alternatives to CAH although it should be guided by the surgeon's experience

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Mechanical prostheses

The insertion of conventional mechanical valves may be performed using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Mechanical prostheses may be implated alone or combined with polyester or pericardial patch when reconstruction of annulus is required. In cases of aggressive lesions requiring root and /or intervalvular fibrosa reconstruction the choice of prosthetic valved conduit with a mechanical valve is considered acceptable alternatives to CAH although it should be guided by the surgeon's experience

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Root replacement Commando procedure Emicommando procedure Root replacement Commando procedure Emicommando procedure Root replacement Commando procedure

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Duke Criteria
* Uncontrolled Infection Local abscess Large vegetation False aneurysm, Fistula, Dehiscence of PV
* Embolism Large vegetation \>10mm, persistent infection
* Heart Failure Involvement of aortic root, intervalvular fibrosa, pulmonary edema, cardiogenic shock