Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Better Selection of Pancreatic Cancer Patients for Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

NCT ID: NCT05253313

Last Updated: 2022-03-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-05-01

Study Completion Date

2024-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pancreatic cancer has the most dismal prognosis with a 5-year survival of 8%. The only curative treatment is surgery which is accompanied by great morbidity and mortality. Recent research indicates that Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is superior in detecting liver metastases compared with today's gold standard computed tomography (CT), which usually is a contraindication to surgery.

Investigators want to randomize patients with pancreatic cancer, who are eligible for surgery to a pre-operative MRI. The investigators want to examine if MRI is as good for the staging as CT and if MRI is better for the identification of liver metastases. Patients will have a follow-up period of 1 year to see if MRI changes the overall survival.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Currently, CT is the state of art for assessing and staging pancreatic cancer. However, it has its limitations when it comes to detecting small liver metastases, which are often found in pancreatic cancer. Recent research indicates that MRI is superior to CT when it comes to the detection of liver metastases. Thus, the investigators want to examine MRI's role in the assessment of pancreatic cancer.

The investigators want to conduct a nationwide RCT to examine the feasibility of using MRI for tumor staging and identification. The overall aim is to improve the selection of patients going to surgery so futile resections are avoided and increase the overall survival. Patients who are deemed eligible for pancreatic resection after being reviewed at a local multidisciplinary tumor board will be, upon consent, electronically randomized to one of two treatment arms (each arm will contain 100 patients). Patients within the control arm will as per usual proceed to surgery, whereas patients in the intervention arm will receive a pre-operative MRI scan. The MRI will be read by experienced gastroenterology radiologists who are blinded to the patient's identity and the initial CT findings. Treatment will be based on MRI findings. There will be a follow-up period of 1 year to see if MRI changes the overall survival. Within this RCT we will conduct three studies.

Study 1) The investigators want to compare pancreatic tumor staging with MRI versus standard upper abdominal CT, we hypothesize that MRI is not inferior to CT.

Study 2) The investigators want to assess MRI's ability to detect liver metastases vs standard upper abdominal CT, in patients otherwise deemed eligible for surgery. We hypothesize that MRI is superior to CT in the detection of liver metastases.

Study 3) The investigators want to assess the impact of MRI, thus patients will be followed for 1 year. We want to see if MRI changes the overall survival, treatment allocation, and recurrence.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreas Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional

Patients who are eligible for surgery are randomized to MRI scan or standard curative surgery. Patients in this arm will receive standard care according to danish standards without pre-operative MRI scans.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

MRI scan

This arm includes patients who have been randomized to pre-operative MRI scans.

Group Type OTHER

MRI scan

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients will be randomized to a pre-operative scan or not. The MRI scan will evaluate the local extent of the tumor and especially focus on identifying possible liver metastases unseen on the CT-scan.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

MRI scan

Patients will be randomized to a pre-operative scan or not. The MRI scan will evaluate the local extent of the tumor and especially focus on identifying possible liver metastases unseen on the CT-scan.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Must be eligible for curative pancreatic resection based on CT
* Must accept randomization

Exclusion Criteria

* Not eligible for curative pancreatic resection
* Unable to undergo MRI.
* Did not accept randomization.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Aarhus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Frank Viborg Mortensen, Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Professor MTK AUh

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Christian Flindt Nielsen., Cand. med.

Role: CONTACT

+4551530041

Jakob Kirkegaard, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+4522900604

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

22552255

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Imaging Biomarkers of Pancreatic Function and Disease
NCT05659147 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE4