Efficacy of Propolis in the Prevention of Oral Mucositis

NCT ID: NCT05250661

Last Updated: 2022-02-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

64 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-15

Study Completion Date

2021-05-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study was carried out to determine the efficacy of propolis in the prevention of oral mucositis and gastrointestinal symptoms associated with oral mucositis in patients with leukemia, lymphoma, and myelodysplastic syndrome receiving high-dose chemotherapy and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. 64 patients, 32 in the propolis and 32 in the control group, were involved in the prospective randomized controlled experimental study. While the standard oral care treatment protocol of the clinic was administered to the control group, aqueous propolis extract was applied to the propolis group in addition to the standard oral care treatment protocol.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objective: The study was carried out to determine the efficacy of propolis in the prevention of oral mucositis and gastrointestinal symptoms associated with oral mucositis in patients with leukemia, lymphoma, and myelodysplastic syndrome receiving high-dose chemotherapy and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Study Design:

The study was conducted as a randomized controlled experimental study. Approval from the Ethics Committee and written permission from the Institution were obtained. After the participants were informed about the purpose of the study, their written consents were obtained. 64 patients, 32 in the propolis and 32 in the control group were involved in the study that was performed in the Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit.

The control group patients used the standard oral care treatment protocol (Tanflex (3x1) and NaHCO3 (1x1)) of the clinic , while the propolis group used the aqueous extract of propolis in addition to this protocol. The individuals in the propolis group gargled 4 times a day (after meals and before going to bed at night) with 5 ml aqueous propolis extract. All patients underwent a daily intraoral examination up to 21 days from the start of high dose chemotherapy. Oral mucositis was recorded on the WHO oral toxicity scale and other gastrointestinal symptoms were recorded on the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scale

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Oral Mucositis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Parallel group, two arm, prospective randomized controlled clinical trial
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

No masking

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Aqueous propolis extract

The individuals in the intervention group were asked to gargle with 5 ml aqueous propolis extract four times a day after meals (morning, noon, evening and night before bedtime) and wait average one minute in the mouth and then spit, in addition to the standard practice of the clinic. According to the standard practice of the clinic, it was performed tanflex (3x1) and/or sodium bicarbonate (1x1) to the patients in the prevention of oral mucositis with the request of the physician. The patients were followed for 21 days. The 21-day period is consistent with the duration of mucositis healing in the literature. Follow-up and evaluation of patients who were discharged early were performed by home visits and made a phone call everyday.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Aqueous propolis extract

Intervention Type OTHER

The patients gargled 4 times a day after meals and 5 ml each time. Patients were instructed to keep the propolis solution in their mouth for one minute, to touch all structures in the mouth, and not to eat or drink anything orally for one hour after spitting.

Control

Standard procedures of the clinic were applied to control group. According to the standard practice of the clinic, it was performed tanflex (3x1) and/or sodium bicarbonate (1x1) to the patients in the prevention of oral mucositis with the request of the physician. Follow-up and evaluation of patients who were discharged early were performed by home visits and made a phone call everyday.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Aqueous propolis extract

The patients gargled 4 times a day after meals and 5 ml each time. Patients were instructed to keep the propolis solution in their mouth for one minute, to touch all structures in the mouth, and not to eat or drink anything orally for one hour after spitting.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years or older
* Ability to communicate verbally
* Not having a diagnosed psychiatric disease
* Receiving inpatient high dose chemotherapy (diagnosed with leukemia, lymphoma and MDS)
* Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation patients
* Zero OM score according to the World Health Organization Oral Toxicity Scale (WHOOTS)
* Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score of 80 and above

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Karadeniz Technical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Seher Çakmak

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Seher ÇAKMAK Karadeniz Technical University

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Karadeniz Technical University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Karadeniz Technical University

Trabzon, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

E.6289

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Omega-3 Hydrogel and Prevention of Oral Mucositis
NCT05214495 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3