Trial Outcomes & Findings for DirEct Versus VIdeo LaryngosCopE Trial (NCT NCT05239195)

NCT ID: NCT05239195

Last Updated: 2024-08-19

Results Overview

The primary outcome is defined as placement of an endotracheal tube in the trachea with a single insertion of a laryngoscope blade into the mouth and EITHER a single insertion of an endotracheal tube into the mouth OR a single insertion of a bougie into the mouth followed by a single insertion of an endotracheal tube over the bougie into the mouth.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

1420 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Duration of procedure (minutes)

Results posted on

2024-08-19

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Video Laryngoscope Group
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope. Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
Direct Laryngoscope Group
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape. Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
Overall Study
STARTED
707
713
Overall Study
COMPLETED
705
712
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
2
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Video Laryngoscope Group
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope. Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
Direct Laryngoscope Group
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape. Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
Overall Study
After enrollment, discovered to be a person experiencing incarceration.
2
1

Baseline Characteristics

DirEct Versus VIdeo LaryngosCopE Trial

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope. Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=712 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape. Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
Total
n=1417 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
54 years
n=5 Participants
55 years
n=7 Participants
55 years
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
240 Participants
n=5 Participants
258 Participants
n=7 Participants
498 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
465 Participants
n=5 Participants
454 Participants
n=7 Participants
919 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race or ethnic group · Non-Hispanic White
360 Participants
n=5 Participants
346 Participants
n=7 Participants
706 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race or ethnic group · Non-Hispanic Black
166 Participants
n=5 Participants
167 Participants
n=7 Participants
333 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race or ethnic group · Hispanic
101 Participants
n=5 Participants
94 Participants
n=7 Participants
195 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race or ethnic group · Other
61 Participants
n=5 Participants
84 Participants
n=7 Participants
145 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race or ethnic group · Not reported
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
705 participants
n=5 Participants
712 participants
n=7 Participants
1417 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Duration of procedure (minutes)

The primary outcome is defined as placement of an endotracheal tube in the trachea with a single insertion of a laryngoscope blade into the mouth and EITHER a single insertion of an endotracheal tube into the mouth OR a single insertion of a bougie into the mouth followed by a single insertion of an endotracheal tube over the bougie into the mouth.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope. Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=712 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape. Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
Number of Intubations With Successful Intubation on the First Attempt
600 Participants
504 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: from induction to 2 minutes following tracheal intubation

The secondary outcome is defined as the number of patients who experienced one or more of the following occurring between induction and 2 minutes after successful intubation: * Severe hypoxemia (lowest oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry \< 80%); * Severe hypotension (systolic blood pressure \< 65 mm Hg or new or increased vasopressor administration); * Cardiac arrest not resulting in death within 1 hour of intubation; or * Cardiac arrest resulting in death within 1 hour of induction

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope. Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=712 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape. Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
Number of Participants With Severe Complications of Tracheal Intubation
151 Participants
149 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Duration of procedure (minutes)

The interval (in seconds) between the first insertion of a laryngoscope blade into the mouth and the final placement of an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy tube in the trachea.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope. Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=712 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape. Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
Duration of Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation
38 Seconds
Interval 26.0 to 60.0
46 Seconds
Interval 30.0 to 83.0

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Duration of procedure (minutes)

Population: A subset of patients were missing this data variable.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=704 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope. Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=706 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape. Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
Number of Laryngoscopy Attempts
Number of times a laryngoscope entered the patient's mouth (reported by observer) - 1
636 Participants
546 Participants
Number of Laryngoscopy Attempts
Number of times a laryngoscope entered the patient's mouth (reported by observer) - 2
54 Participants
127 Participants
Number of Laryngoscopy Attempts
Number of times a laryngoscope entered the patient's mouth (reported by observer) - 3+
14 Participants
33 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Duration of procedure (minutes)

Population: Data was not available for entire patient population.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope. Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=707 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape. Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
Number of Attempts to Cannulate the Trachea With a Bougie or an Endotracheal Tube
Bougie - 3+
6 number of events
27 number of events
Number of Attempts to Cannulate the Trachea With a Bougie or an Endotracheal Tube
Endotracheal Tube - 1
646 number of events
620 number of events
Number of Attempts to Cannulate the Trachea With a Bougie or an Endotracheal Tube
Endotracheal Tube - 2
43 number of events
66 number of events
Number of Attempts to Cannulate the Trachea With a Bougie or an Endotracheal Tube
Endotracheal Tube - 3+
15 number of events
19 number of events
Number of Attempts to Cannulate the Trachea With a Bougie or an Endotracheal Tube
Bougie - 0
364 number of events
330 number of events
Number of Attempts to Cannulate the Trachea With a Bougie or an Endotracheal Tube
Bougie - 1
316 number of events
317 number of events
Number of Attempts to Cannulate the Trachea With a Bougie or an Endotracheal Tube
Bougie - 2
19 number of events
33 number of events

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: from induction to 2 minutes following tracheal intubation

This outcome reports the number of participants that experienced successful intubation on the first attempt without experiencing complications, a composite of two independent outcomes: successful intubation on the first attempt (the primary outcome of the trial) and severe complication (the secondary outcome of the trial).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope. Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=712 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape. Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
Successful Intubation on the First Attempt Without a Severe Complication
484 Participants
420 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Duration of procedure (minutes)

Providers could give more than one reason for failure to intubate on the first attempt for each intubation (not mutually exclusive). In addition, data on the reason for failure to intubate on the first attempt was missing for 23 patients in the video laryngoscope group and 40 patients in the direct laryngoscope group. Reason for failure among those who did not meet the primary outcome (successful intubation on the first attempt): * Inadequate view of the larynx * Inability to intubate the trachea with an endotracheal tube * Inability to cannulate the trachea with a bougie * Attempt aborted due to change in patient condition (e.g., worsening hypoxemia, hypotension, bradycardia, vomiting, bleeding) * Technical failure of the laryngoscope (e.g., battery, light source, camera, screen) * Other * Not Reported

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope. Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=712 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape. Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
Reason for Failure to Intubate on the First Attempt
Inadequate view of the larynx
26 Participants
123 Participants
Reason for Failure to Intubate on the First Attempt
Inability to intubate the trachea with an endotracheal tube
44 Participants
32 Participants
Reason for Failure to Intubate on the First Attempt
Inability to cannulate the trachea with a bougie
7 Participants
19 Participants
Reason for Failure to Intubate on the First Attempt
Attempt aborted due to change in patient condition
2 Participants
14 Participants
Reason for Failure to Intubate on the First Attempt
Technical failure of the laryngoscope (e.g., battery, light source, camera, screen)
2 Participants
4 Participants
Reason for Failure to Intubate on the First Attempt
Other
13 Participants
10 Participants
Reason for Failure to Intubate on the First Attempt
Not Reported
23 Participants
40 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: from induction to 2 minutes following tracheal intubation

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope. Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=712 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape. Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
Operator-reported Aspiration
7 Participants
12 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: from induction to 2 minutes following tracheal intubation

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope. Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=712 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape. Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
Esophageal Intubation
6 Participants
9 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: from induction to 2 minutes following tracheal intubation

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope. Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=712 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape. Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
Injury to the Teeth
3 Participants
2 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 28 days

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope. Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=712 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape. Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
ICU-free Days in the First 28 Days
20 days
Interval 0.0 to 25.0
19 days
Interval 0.0 to 24.0

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 28 days

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope. Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=712 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape. Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
Ventilator Free Days in the First 28 Days
24 days
Interval 0.0 to 26.0
23 days
Interval 0.0 to 26.0

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 28 days

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope. Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=712 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape. Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
All-cause In-hospital Mortality
184 Participants
191 Participants

Adverse Events

Video Laryngoscope Group

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 184 deaths

Direct Laryngoscope Group

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 191 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Jonathan D Casey, MD, MSc

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Phone: 615-875-4681

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place