Trial Outcomes & Findings for DirEct Versus VIdeo LaryngosCopE Trial (NCT NCT05239195)
NCT ID: NCT05239195
Last Updated: 2024-08-19
Results Overview
The primary outcome is defined as placement of an endotracheal tube in the trachea with a single insertion of a laryngoscope blade into the mouth and EITHER a single insertion of an endotracheal tube into the mouth OR a single insertion of a bougie into the mouth followed by a single insertion of an endotracheal tube over the bougie into the mouth.
COMPLETED
NA
1420 participants
Duration of procedure (minutes)
2024-08-19
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Video Laryngoscope Group
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope.
Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
|
Direct Laryngoscope Group
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape.
Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
707
|
713
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
705
|
712
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Video Laryngoscope Group
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope.
Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
|
Direct Laryngoscope Group
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape.
Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
After enrollment, discovered to be a person experiencing incarceration.
|
2
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
DirEct Versus VIdeo LaryngosCopE Trial
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope.
Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
|
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=712 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape.
Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
|
Total
n=1417 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
54 years
n=5 Participants
|
55 years
n=7 Participants
|
55 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
240 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
258 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
498 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
465 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
454 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
919 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race or ethnic group · Non-Hispanic White
|
360 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
346 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
706 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race or ethnic group · Non-Hispanic Black
|
166 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
167 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
333 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race or ethnic group · Hispanic
|
101 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
94 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
195 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race or ethnic group · Other
|
61 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
84 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
145 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race or ethnic group · Not reported
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
705 participants
n=5 Participants
|
712 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1417 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Duration of procedure (minutes)The primary outcome is defined as placement of an endotracheal tube in the trachea with a single insertion of a laryngoscope blade into the mouth and EITHER a single insertion of an endotracheal tube into the mouth OR a single insertion of a bougie into the mouth followed by a single insertion of an endotracheal tube over the bougie into the mouth.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope.
Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
|
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=712 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape.
Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Intubations With Successful Intubation on the First Attempt
|
600 Participants
|
504 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: from induction to 2 minutes following tracheal intubationThe secondary outcome is defined as the number of patients who experienced one or more of the following occurring between induction and 2 minutes after successful intubation: * Severe hypoxemia (lowest oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry \< 80%); * Severe hypotension (systolic blood pressure \< 65 mm Hg or new or increased vasopressor administration); * Cardiac arrest not resulting in death within 1 hour of intubation; or * Cardiac arrest resulting in death within 1 hour of induction
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope.
Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
|
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=712 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape.
Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Severe Complications of Tracheal Intubation
|
151 Participants
|
149 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Duration of procedure (minutes)The interval (in seconds) between the first insertion of a laryngoscope blade into the mouth and the final placement of an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy tube in the trachea.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope.
Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
|
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=712 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape.
Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation
|
38 Seconds
Interval 26.0 to 60.0
|
46 Seconds
Interval 30.0 to 83.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Duration of procedure (minutes)Population: A subset of patients were missing this data variable.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=704 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope.
Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
|
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=706 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape.
Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Laryngoscopy Attempts
Number of times a laryngoscope entered the patient's mouth (reported by observer) - 1
|
636 Participants
|
546 Participants
|
|
Number of Laryngoscopy Attempts
Number of times a laryngoscope entered the patient's mouth (reported by observer) - 2
|
54 Participants
|
127 Participants
|
|
Number of Laryngoscopy Attempts
Number of times a laryngoscope entered the patient's mouth (reported by observer) - 3+
|
14 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Duration of procedure (minutes)Population: Data was not available for entire patient population.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope.
Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
|
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=707 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape.
Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Attempts to Cannulate the Trachea With a Bougie or an Endotracheal Tube
Bougie - 3+
|
6 number of events
|
27 number of events
|
|
Number of Attempts to Cannulate the Trachea With a Bougie or an Endotracheal Tube
Endotracheal Tube - 1
|
646 number of events
|
620 number of events
|
|
Number of Attempts to Cannulate the Trachea With a Bougie or an Endotracheal Tube
Endotracheal Tube - 2
|
43 number of events
|
66 number of events
|
|
Number of Attempts to Cannulate the Trachea With a Bougie or an Endotracheal Tube
Endotracheal Tube - 3+
|
15 number of events
|
19 number of events
|
|
Number of Attempts to Cannulate the Trachea With a Bougie or an Endotracheal Tube
Bougie - 0
|
364 number of events
|
330 number of events
|
|
Number of Attempts to Cannulate the Trachea With a Bougie or an Endotracheal Tube
Bougie - 1
|
316 number of events
|
317 number of events
|
|
Number of Attempts to Cannulate the Trachea With a Bougie or an Endotracheal Tube
Bougie - 2
|
19 number of events
|
33 number of events
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: from induction to 2 minutes following tracheal intubationThis outcome reports the number of participants that experienced successful intubation on the first attempt without experiencing complications, a composite of two independent outcomes: successful intubation on the first attempt (the primary outcome of the trial) and severe complication (the secondary outcome of the trial).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope.
Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
|
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=712 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape.
Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
|
|---|---|---|
|
Successful Intubation on the First Attempt Without a Severe Complication
|
484 Participants
|
420 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Duration of procedure (minutes)Providers could give more than one reason for failure to intubate on the first attempt for each intubation (not mutually exclusive). In addition, data on the reason for failure to intubate on the first attempt was missing for 23 patients in the video laryngoscope group and 40 patients in the direct laryngoscope group. Reason for failure among those who did not meet the primary outcome (successful intubation on the first attempt): * Inadequate view of the larynx * Inability to intubate the trachea with an endotracheal tube * Inability to cannulate the trachea with a bougie * Attempt aborted due to change in patient condition (e.g., worsening hypoxemia, hypotension, bradycardia, vomiting, bleeding) * Technical failure of the laryngoscope (e.g., battery, light source, camera, screen) * Other * Not Reported
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope.
Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
|
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=712 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape.
Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
|
|---|---|---|
|
Reason for Failure to Intubate on the First Attempt
Inadequate view of the larynx
|
26 Participants
|
123 Participants
|
|
Reason for Failure to Intubate on the First Attempt
Inability to intubate the trachea with an endotracheal tube
|
44 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
|
Reason for Failure to Intubate on the First Attempt
Inability to cannulate the trachea with a bougie
|
7 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
Reason for Failure to Intubate on the First Attempt
Attempt aborted due to change in patient condition
|
2 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Reason for Failure to Intubate on the First Attempt
Technical failure of the laryngoscope (e.g., battery, light source, camera, screen)
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Reason for Failure to Intubate on the First Attempt
Other
|
13 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Reason for Failure to Intubate on the First Attempt
Not Reported
|
23 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: from induction to 2 minutes following tracheal intubationOutcome measures
| Measure |
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope.
Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
|
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=712 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape.
Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
|
|---|---|---|
|
Operator-reported Aspiration
|
7 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: from induction to 2 minutes following tracheal intubationOutcome measures
| Measure |
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope.
Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
|
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=712 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape.
Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
|
|---|---|---|
|
Esophageal Intubation
|
6 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: from induction to 2 minutes following tracheal intubationOutcome measures
| Measure |
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope.
Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
|
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=712 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape.
Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
|
|---|---|---|
|
Injury to the Teeth
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 28 daysOutcome measures
| Measure |
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope.
Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
|
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=712 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape.
Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
|
|---|---|---|
|
ICU-free Days in the First 28 Days
|
20 days
Interval 0.0 to 25.0
|
19 days
Interval 0.0 to 24.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 28 daysOutcome measures
| Measure |
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope.
Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
|
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=712 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape.
Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
|
|---|---|---|
|
Ventilator Free Days in the First 28 Days
|
24 days
Interval 0.0 to 26.0
|
23 days
Interval 0.0 to 26.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 28 daysOutcome measures
| Measure |
Video Laryngoscope Group
n=705 Participants
For patients assigned to the video laryngoscope group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A video laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of video laryngoscope.
Video Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
|
Direct Laryngoscope Group
n=712 Participants
For patients assigned to the direct laryngoscope group, the operator will use a direct laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt. A direct laryngoscope will be defined as a laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen. Trial protocol will not dictate the brand of direct laryngoscope or the blade shape.
Direct Laryngoscope: Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
|
|---|---|---|
|
All-cause In-hospital Mortality
|
184 Participants
|
191 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Video Laryngoscope Group
Direct Laryngoscope Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Jonathan D Casey, MD, MSc
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place