Trial Outcomes & Findings for Self-affirmation Intervention for People Newly Diagnosed With Advanced Cancer (NCT NCT05235750)

NCT ID: NCT05235750

Last Updated: 2025-03-17

Results Overview

Changes include raw score changes and standardized mean differences. Scores on the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale range from 0 to 30, with higher score indicating higher level of self-esteem.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

57 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline (T1) as well as 2 weeks (T2), 6 weeks (T3), and 8 weeks post baseline (T4)

Results posted on

2025-03-17

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Writing
This is a single-group study with one arm only. Self-affirmation writing: Writing with a focus on self-affirmation at the time following a diagnosis of an advanced cancer
Overall Study
STARTED
57
Overall Study
COMPLETED
45
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
12

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Self-affirmation Intervention for People Newly Diagnosed With Advanced Cancer

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Writing
n=54 Participants
This is a single-group study with one arm only. Self-affirmation writing: Writing with a focus on self-affirmation at the time following a diagnosis of an advanced cancer
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
62.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Caucasian
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · African American
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Asian
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity · non-Hispanic
54 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity · Hispanic
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Education
Up to 8th grade
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Education
High school
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
Education
College
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
Education
Graduate school
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Education
Unknown or not reported
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Marital status
single
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Marital status
married
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
Marital status
divorced
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Marital status
widowed
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Religious affiliation
None
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
Religious affiliation
Protestant
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
Religious affiliation
Catholic
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Religious affiliation
Other
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
Religious affiliation
Undisclosed
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Time since cancer diagnosis
46.3 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.5 • n=5 Participants
Stage of cancer
III
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
Stage of cancer
IV
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
Stage of cancer
recurrent
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Stage of cancer
unstaged
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Cancer site
Gastrointestinal (GI)
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
Cancer site
Lung
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Cancer site
Gynecological (GYN)
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
Cancer site
Head and neck
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Cancer site
Prostate
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Cancer site
Breast
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Cancer site
Hematological
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Preference to talk
yes
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
Preference to talk
no
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Preference to talk
not sure
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ever wrote a diary in life
no
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ever wrote a diary in life
yes
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
Should one have a religious affiliation to be spiritual?
no
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
Should one have a religious affiliation to be spiritual?
yes
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
Perceived threat from cancer diagnosis
a great deal threatening
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
Perceived threat from cancer diagnosis
moderately threatening
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
Perceived threat from cancer diagnosis
a little threatening
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Perceived threat from cancer diagnosis
not or hardly threatening
11 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (T1) as well as 2 weeks (T2), 6 weeks (T3), and 8 weeks post baseline (T4)

Changes include raw score changes and standardized mean differences. Scores on the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale range from 0 to 30, with higher score indicating higher level of self-esteem.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Writing
n=54 Participants
This is a single-group study with one arm only. Self-affirmation writing: Writing with a focus on self-affirmation at the time following a diagnosis of an advanced cancer
Mean Changes From Baseline in Self-esteem Scores on the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (RSES) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
RSES at T1
23.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.8
Mean Changes From Baseline in Self-esteem Scores on the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (RSES) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
RSES at T2
23.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.1
Mean Changes From Baseline in Self-esteem Scores on the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (RSES) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
RSES at T3
23.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.2
Mean Changes From Baseline in Self-esteem Scores on the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (RSES) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
RSES at T4
24.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.7

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (T1) as well as 2 weeks (T2), 6 weeks (T3), and 8 weeks post baseline (T4)

Changes include raw score changes and standardized mean differences. Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) range from 0 to 108, with higher score indicating higher level of quality of life. Each subscale ranging from 0 to 28, with higher score indicating higher level of quality of life. The raw scores of overall QoL (total FACT-G), four composite domains (physical well-being, PWB; social/family well-being, SWB; emotional well-being, EWB; functional well-being, FWB), global QoL (item Gf7 "I am content with the quality of my life right now") and one item pertinent to this study (Ge6 "I worry that my condition will get worse") were presented below.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Writing
n=54 Participants
This is a single-group study with one arm only. Self-affirmation writing: Writing with a focus on self-affirmation at the time following a diagnosis of an advanced cancer
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
Gf7 at T1
2.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
FACT-G (total score) at T1
78.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.2
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
FACT-G (total score) at T2
80.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.3
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
FACT-G (total score) at T3
80.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.9
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
FACT-G (total score) at T4
81.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.0
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
PWB at T1
20.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.8
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
PWB at T2
19.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.0
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
PWB at T3
19.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.3
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
PWB at T4
19.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.7
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
SWB at T1
22.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.4
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
SWB at T2
24.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.3
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
SWB at T3
23.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.2
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
SWB at T4
23.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.4
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
EWB at T1
18.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.9
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
EWB at T2
19.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.4
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
EWB at T3
19.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.5
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
EWB at T4
19.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.5
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
FWB at T1
16.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.8
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
FWB at T2
18.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.3
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
FWB at T3
18.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.7
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
FWB at T4
18.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.2
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
Gf7 at T2
2.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
Gf7 at T3
2.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
Gf7 at T4
2.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
Ge6 at T1
2.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
Ge6 at T2
2.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
Ge6 at T3
3.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
Ge6 at T4
3.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (T1) as well as 2 weeks (T2), 6 weeks (T3), and 8 weeks post baseline (T4)

Changes include raw score changes and standardized mean differences. The FACIT-Sp-12 scale measures an individual's level of spiritual well-being, specifically assessing their sense of meaning, peace, and faith in life, with higher scores indicating a better level of spiritual well-being and lower scores a worse level of spiritual well-being. It consists of 12 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = Not at all to 4 = Very much). The FACIT-Sp-12 Scale consists of 2 sub-scales Meaning/Peace (M/P) with a range of 0-32, and Faith ranging from 1-16. Possible overall spiritual well-being or FACIT-Sp-12 (total) range from 0 to 48. The revised Faith subscale as well as the revised FACIT-Sp-12 scale have the same scale range of the original measures.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Writing
n=54 Participants
This is a single-group study with one arm only. Self-affirmation writing: Writing with a focus on self-affirmation at the time following a diagnosis of an advanced cancer
Mean Changes From Baseline in Spiritual Well-Being Scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being 12 Item Scale (FACIT-Sp-12) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
FACIT-Sp-12 (total) at T1
39.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.2
Mean Changes From Baseline in Spiritual Well-Being Scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being 12 Item Scale (FACIT-Sp-12) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
FACIT-Sp-12 (total) at T2
40.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.8
Mean Changes From Baseline in Spiritual Well-Being Scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being 12 Item Scale (FACIT-Sp-12) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
FACIT-Sp-12 (total) at T3
41.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.0
Mean Changes From Baseline in Spiritual Well-Being Scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being 12 Item Scale (FACIT-Sp-12) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
FACIT-Sp-12 (total) at T4
40.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.0
Mean Changes From Baseline in Spiritual Well-Being Scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being 12 Item Scale (FACIT-Sp-12) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
M/P at T1
26.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.3
Mean Changes From Baseline in Spiritual Well-Being Scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being 12 Item Scale (FACIT-Sp-12) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
M/P at T2
27.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.3
Mean Changes From Baseline in Spiritual Well-Being Scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being 12 Item Scale (FACIT-Sp-12) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
M/P at T3
26.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.0
Mean Changes From Baseline in Spiritual Well-Being Scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being 12 Item Scale (FACIT-Sp-12) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
M/P at T4
26.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.7
Mean Changes From Baseline in Spiritual Well-Being Scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being 12 Item Scale (FACIT-Sp-12) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
Faith at T1
12.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.9
Mean Changes From Baseline in Spiritual Well-Being Scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being 12 Item Scale (FACIT-Sp-12) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
Faith at T2
13.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.5
Mean Changes From Baseline in Spiritual Well-Being Scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being 12 Item Scale (FACIT-Sp-12) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
Faith at T3
14.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
Mean Changes From Baseline in Spiritual Well-Being Scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being 12 Item Scale (FACIT-Sp-12) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
Faith at T4
13.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.6
Mean Changes From Baseline in Spiritual Well-Being Scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being 12 Item Scale (FACIT-Sp-12) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
Faith (revised) at T1
13.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.5
Mean Changes From Baseline in Spiritual Well-Being Scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being 12 Item Scale (FACIT-Sp-12) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
Faith (revised) at T2
13.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
Mean Changes From Baseline in Spiritual Well-Being Scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being 12 Item Scale (FACIT-Sp-12) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
Faith (revised) at T3
14.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
Mean Changes From Baseline in Spiritual Well-Being Scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being 12 Item Scale (FACIT-Sp-12) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
Faith (revised) at T4
13.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.4
Mean Changes From Baseline in Spiritual Well-Being Scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being 12 Item Scale (FACIT-Sp-12) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
FACIT-Sp-12 total (revised) at T1
39.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.7
Mean Changes From Baseline in Spiritual Well-Being Scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being 12 Item Scale (FACIT-Sp-12) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
FACIT-Sp-12 total (revised) at T2
40.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.6
Mean Changes From Baseline in Spiritual Well-Being Scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being 12 Item Scale (FACIT-Sp-12) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
FACIT-Sp-12 total (revised) at T3
40.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.9
Mean Changes From Baseline in Spiritual Well-Being Scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being 12 Item Scale (FACIT-Sp-12) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
FACIT-Sp-12 total (revised) at T4
39.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (T1) as well as 2 weeks (T2), 6 weeks (T3), and 8 weeks post baseline (T4)

Changes include raw score changes and standardized mean differences. Scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) range from 0 to 42, with higher score indicating higher level of anxiety or depression. The two subscales HADS anxiety (HADS-A) and HADS depression (HADS-D) were analyzed separately. Each sub-scale has a range from 0-21, with the higher score indicating higher level of anxiety or depression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Writing
n=54 Participants
This is a single-group study with one arm only. Self-affirmation writing: Writing with a focus on self-affirmation at the time following a diagnosis of an advanced cancer
Mean Changes From Baseline in Anxiety and Depression Scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
HADS-A at T1
6.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.9
Mean Changes From Baseline in Anxiety and Depression Scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
HADS-A at T2
5.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.3
Mean Changes From Baseline in Anxiety and Depression Scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
HADS-A at T3
5.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.0
Mean Changes From Baseline in Anxiety and Depression Scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
HADS-A at T4
5.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.1
Mean Changes From Baseline in Anxiety and Depression Scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
HADS-D at T1
4.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.2
Mean Changes From Baseline in Anxiety and Depression Scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
HADS-D at T2
3.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
Mean Changes From Baseline in Anxiety and Depression Scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
HADS-D at T3
4.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.5
Mean Changes From Baseline in Anxiety and Depression Scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to Two-, Six-, and Eight Weeks Post Baseline
HADS-D at T4
4.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.7

Adverse Events

Writing

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 3 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Mei Bai

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Phone: 501-603-1900

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place