7.5F Versus 9.2F Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of 1-2cm Renal Calculi on Postoperative Infection
NCT ID: NCT05231577
Last Updated: 2022-02-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-02-01
2022-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The use of ureteroscopic sheath in ureteroscopic surgery can effectively reduce the intrarenal pressure, which is an important measure to reduce the incidence of postoperative infection. Theoretically, the larger the space, the better the reflux effect and the lower the incidence of postoperative infection. The study showed that the incidence of ureteral sheath infection was significantly lower than that of ureteral sheath infection after operation. When using the same caliber ureteroscopic sheath, use a smaller caliber ureteroscopy to increase the space between the ureteroscopy and the ureteral sheath, promote reflux, reduce intrarenal pressure and reduce the incidence of postoperative infection. However, there is still a lack of relevant research on the effect of different caliber ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal calculi on postoperative infection.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of RIRS Under Local Anesthesia and Its Influencing Factors
NCT06737497
Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones With a Diameter≤2cm by Intelligent Pressure-controlled Flexible Ureteroscope
NCT05201599
Comparing Different Diameter fURSs With Similar RESDs for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones
NCT06987760
SMP vs RIRS for Symptomatic Lower Pole Renal Calculi of 10-20 mm Size: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02519634
Comparison of the Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscope and Percutaneous Nephroscopic Surgery in the Treatment of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT06507176
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental: Patients in Group 0 undergo 7.5fr ultra-fine ureteroscopy
7.5fr ultra-fine ureteroscopy
The patient placed the lithotomy position, placed the ureteroscope to explore the affected ureter, retrogradely placed the guide wire, and placed the 12 / 14fr ureteral sheath under X-ray monitoring until the affected ureter was close to the outlet of the renal pelvis. Group 1 patients used 7.5fr ultra-fine ureteroscopy
Experimental: Patients in Group 2 undergo 9.2fr ureteroscopy
9.2fr Ureteroscopy
The patient placed the lithotomy position, placed the ureteroscope to explore the affected ureter, retrogradely placed the guide wire, and placed the 12 / 14fr ureteral sheath under X-ray monitoring until the affected ureter was close to the outlet of the renal pelvis. Group 2 patients used 9.2fr Ureteroscopy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
7.5fr ultra-fine ureteroscopy
The patient placed the lithotomy position, placed the ureteroscope to explore the affected ureter, retrogradely placed the guide wire, and placed the 12 / 14fr ureteral sheath under X-ray monitoring until the affected ureter was close to the outlet of the renal pelvis. Group 1 patients used 7.5fr ultra-fine ureteroscopy
9.2fr Ureteroscopy
The patient placed the lithotomy position, placed the ureteroscope to explore the affected ureter, retrogradely placed the guide wire, and placed the 12 / 14fr ureteral sheath under X-ray monitoring until the affected ureter was close to the outlet of the renal pelvis. Group 2 patients used 9.2fr Ureteroscopy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Aged 18-70 years. 3.1-2cm kidney stones
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with abnormal anatomical structure, ureteral stenosis and urinary diversion, such as ectopic kidney, horseshoe kidney and duplicate kidney;
3. Patients who have undergone nephrostomy;
4. Severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency;
5. Pregnant women.
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Guohua Zeng
Vice president
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Guohua Zeng, Ph.D & MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Urology, Minimally invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong,China, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Elashry OM, Elbahnasy AM, Rao GS, Nakada SY, Clayman RV. Flexible ureteroscopy: Washington University experience with the 9.3F and 7.5F flexible ureteroscopes. J Urol. 1997 Jun;157(6):2074-80. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64677-9.
Zhong W, Zhu W, Zhao Z, Liao B, Mai H, Liu C, Wang K, Zhang X, Xu C, Zeng G. 7.5F Mini Flexible Ureteroscope in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Initial Results from a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. J Endourol. 2024 May;38(5):421-425. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0540. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RCT(2022)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.