High Resolution Virtual Chromoendoscopy Versus Seattle Protocol for the Surveillance of Barrett's Esophagus
NCT ID: NCT05229783
Last Updated: 2025-11-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
110 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-05-11
2025-02-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
New optical tools such as high-resolution endoscopy combined with magnification and electronic chromoendoscopy can reveal subtle mucosal and microvascular changes in the BE, which could improve the detection of early neoplastic lesions. However, there is still insufficient evidence to recommend its use in routine BE surveillance.
The investigators hypothesize that careful examination of Barrett's Esophagus by high-resolution endoscopy combined with virtual chromoendoscopy could replace the Seattle protocol for BE monitoring and detection of dysplasic lesions, and thus modify existing recommendations.
In this study, each patient will be his(her) own control and have the two procedures :
* Firstly, an endoscopist called A will perform high-resolution endoscopy combined with virtual chromoendocopy and note on a scheme the biopsies/resection he would have done with this procedure.
* Secondly, another endoscopist called B will do the examination using white light modality of the endoscope and process as follows :
1. He/she will describe all visible lesions with precise indications of their location on a virgin scheme;
2. Then, he/she will be unblinded to endoscopist A findings, see the scheme of endoscopist A and perform biopsies/resection according to instructions of this scheme;
3. He/she will perform the biopsies/resection he/she would have added (if any);
4. Finally, he/she will perform the quadrantic biopsies according to Seattle Protocol.
Final histology results will serve as gold standard for the diagnosis of early esophageal adenocarcnoma or high grade displasia.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
* Firsty : high-resolution endoscopy combined with virtual chromoendocopy (performed by endoscopist A)
* Secondly: white light endoscopy with Seattle protocol (performed by endoscopist B)
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Electronic chromoendoscopy
High-resolution endoscopy combined with virtual chromoendocopy to detect esophageal displasic lesions
Electronic chromoendoscopy
Inspection of the Barrett's esophagus using the electronic chromoendoscopy modality of the endoscope for the detection of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma lesions.
White light endoscopy with Seattle protocol
White light endoscopy to detect esophageal displasic lesions, and then systemic quadrantic biopsies every 2 centimeters from the esogastric junction to the top of the Barett's esophagus (Seattle protocol)
White light endoscopy with Seattle protocol
Inspection of the Barrett's esophagus using the white light modality of the endoscope for the detection of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma lesions, and then systemic quadrantic biopsies every 2 centimeters from the esogastric junction to the top of the Barett's esophagus (Seattle protocol)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Electronic chromoendoscopy
Inspection of the Barrett's esophagus using the electronic chromoendoscopy modality of the endoscope for the detection of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma lesions.
White light endoscopy with Seattle protocol
Inspection of the Barrett's esophagus using the white light modality of the endoscope for the detection of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma lesions, and then systemic quadrantic biopsies every 2 centimeters from the esogastric junction to the top of the Barett's esophagus (Seattle protocol)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Female of childbearing potential must use appropriate method(s) of contraception during the clinical trial (i.e.: Intrauterine Device, pill, implant,sexual abstinence);
* Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus preferably labelled "flat mucosal dysplasia";
* Patient requiring esophageal endoscopy as part of their regular monitoring;
* Affiliated to social security;
* Patient received Patient Information Form and accepted to participate to the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Known invasive esophageal adenocarcinoma;
* Contraindication to general anesthesia;
* Ongoing clopidogrel or anticoagulant therapy or coagulation disorder (platelet count \< 50 000/mm3, Prothrombin time ratio \<50%);
* Poor general health status precluding subsequent follow up of Barrett's Esophagus ;
* For female: pregnancy or breastfeeding;
* Adults under a legal protection regime (guardianship, trusteeship, "under judicial protection").
* Ongoing participation in another study requiring an intervention on Barrett's Esophagus during patient's participation in Converse study
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Nantes University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lucille QUENEHERVE, Doctor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHU de Brest
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Amiens University Hospital
Amiens, , France
Besançon University Hospital
Besançon, , France
Bordeaux University Hospital
Bordeaux, , France
Brest University Hospital
Brest, , France
Private Bercy clinic
Charenton, , France
Limoges University Hospital
Limoges, , France
Lyon University Hospital
Lyon, , France
Nancy University Hospital
Nancy, , France
Nantes University Hospital
Nantes, , France
Nice University Hospital
Nice, , France
Public Assistance - Paris hospitals - Cochin hospital
Paris, , France
Public Assistance- Paris Hospitals - Georges Pompidou European Hospital
Paris, , France
Poitiers University Hospital
Poitiers, , France
Rennes University Hospital
Rennes, , France
Sainte Barbe Clinic
Strasbourg, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RC21_0411
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id