High Resolution Virtual Chromoendoscopy Versus Seattle Protocol for the Surveillance of Barrett's Esophagus

NCT ID: NCT05229783

Last Updated: 2025-11-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

110 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-05-11

Study Completion Date

2025-02-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators hypothesize that careful examination of Barrett's esophagus by high-resolution endoscopy combined with virtual chromoendoscopy could replace the Seattle protocol for Barrett's esophagus monitoring and detection of dysplasic lesions, and thus modify existing recommendations.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a pre-neoplastic condition that predisposes to dysplasia and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, a cancer with an increasing incidence and poor prognosis. However, when detected at an early stage, superficial lesions can be effectively treated by endoscopic resection. Although BE degeneration remains a rare event, the European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommends that BE be followed according to its size. Follow-up consists of a digestive endoscopy with white light examination of the esophagus, targeted biopsies of any visible lesions and quadrantic biopsies every 2 centimeters from the esogastric junction to the top of the BE, at a frequency that depends on the presence of dysplasia and the size of the BE. However, physician adherence to this procedure, known as the Seattle Protocol, is low because : 1) it increases the time required for the endoscopist to examine the patient and therefore the duration of sedation, as well as the time needed to interpret the pathology, 2) the risk of sampling error is high because only a small portion of the esophageal mucosa can be biopsied and 3) this approach is costly because of the time spent on the Seattle protocol in the operating room and in the pathology department.

New optical tools such as high-resolution endoscopy combined with magnification and electronic chromoendoscopy can reveal subtle mucosal and microvascular changes in the BE, which could improve the detection of early neoplastic lesions. However, there is still insufficient evidence to recommend its use in routine BE surveillance.

The investigators hypothesize that careful examination of Barrett's Esophagus by high-resolution endoscopy combined with virtual chromoendoscopy could replace the Seattle protocol for BE monitoring and detection of dysplasic lesions, and thus modify existing recommendations.

In this study, each patient will be his(her) own control and have the two procedures :

* Firstly, an endoscopist called A will perform high-resolution endoscopy combined with virtual chromoendocopy and note on a scheme the biopsies/resection he would have done with this procedure.
* Secondly, another endoscopist called B will do the examination using white light modality of the endoscope and process as follows :

1. He/she will describe all visible lesions with precise indications of their location on a virgin scheme;
2. Then, he/she will be unblinded to endoscopist A findings, see the scheme of endoscopist A and perform biopsies/resection according to instructions of this scheme;
3. He/she will perform the biopsies/resection he/she would have added (if any);
4. Finally, he/she will perform the quadrantic biopsies according to Seattle Protocol.

Final histology results will serve as gold standard for the diagnosis of early esophageal adenocarcnoma or high grade displasia.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Barrett Esophagus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Each patient will be his (her) own control and have the two procedures :

* Firsty : high-resolution endoscopy combined with virtual chromoendocopy (performed by endoscopist A)
* Secondly: white light endoscopy with Seattle protocol (performed by endoscopist B)
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Caregivers
The two endoscopists will be blinded to each other's findings when searching the lesions.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Electronic chromoendoscopy

High-resolution endoscopy combined with virtual chromoendocopy to detect esophageal displasic lesions

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Electronic chromoendoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Inspection of the Barrett's esophagus using the electronic chromoendoscopy modality of the endoscope for the detection of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma lesions.

White light endoscopy with Seattle protocol

White light endoscopy to detect esophageal displasic lesions, and then systemic quadrantic biopsies every 2 centimeters from the esogastric junction to the top of the Barett's esophagus (Seattle protocol)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

White light endoscopy with Seattle protocol

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Inspection of the Barrett's esophagus using the white light modality of the endoscope for the detection of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma lesions, and then systemic quadrantic biopsies every 2 centimeters from the esogastric junction to the top of the Barett's esophagus (Seattle protocol)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Electronic chromoendoscopy

Inspection of the Barrett's esophagus using the electronic chromoendoscopy modality of the endoscope for the detection of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma lesions.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

White light endoscopy with Seattle protocol

Inspection of the Barrett's esophagus using the white light modality of the endoscope for the detection of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma lesions, and then systemic quadrantic biopsies every 2 centimeters from the esogastric junction to the top of the Barett's esophagus (Seattle protocol)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or Female with Age above ≥ years old;
* Female of childbearing potential must use appropriate method(s) of contraception during the clinical trial (i.e.: Intrauterine Device, pill, implant,sexual abstinence);
* Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus preferably labelled "flat mucosal dysplasia";
* Patient requiring esophageal endoscopy as part of their regular monitoring;
* Affiliated to social security;
* Patient received Patient Information Form and accepted to participate to the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Previously treated Barrett's Esophagus;
* Known invasive esophageal adenocarcinoma;
* Contraindication to general anesthesia;
* Ongoing clopidogrel or anticoagulant therapy or coagulation disorder (platelet count \< 50 000/mm3, Prothrombin time ratio \<50%);
* Poor general health status precluding subsequent follow up of Barrett's Esophagus ;
* For female: pregnancy or breastfeeding;
* Adults under a legal protection regime (guardianship, trusteeship, "under judicial protection").
* Ongoing participation in another study requiring an intervention on Barrett's Esophagus during patient's participation in Converse study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nantes University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lucille QUENEHERVE, Doctor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU de Brest

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Amiens University Hospital

Amiens, , France

Site Status

Besançon University Hospital

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Bordeaux University Hospital

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Brest University Hospital

Brest, , France

Site Status

Private Bercy clinic

Charenton, , France

Site Status

Limoges University Hospital

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Lyon University Hospital

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Nancy University Hospital

Nancy, , France

Site Status

Nantes University Hospital

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Nice University Hospital

Nice, , France

Site Status

Public Assistance - Paris hospitals - Cochin hospital

Paris, , France

Site Status

Public Assistance- Paris Hospitals - Georges Pompidou European Hospital

Paris, , France

Site Status

Poitiers University Hospital

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

Rennes University Hospital

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Sainte Barbe Clinic

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RC21_0411

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id