Trial Outcomes & Findings for Feasibility of VOICES Elder Abuse Intervention in Primary Care Setting (VOICES-PC Feasibility) (NCT NCT05224843)

NCT ID: NCT05224843

Last Updated: 2023-07-17

Results Overview

Participation will be determined by the number of patients enrolled in VOICES. Successful enrollment of 80 older adults (N=80).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE1

Target enrollment

80 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

5-10 minutes before VOICES intervention use.

Results posted on

2023-07-17

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Older Adults Enrolled in the Study
The number of eligible older adults who were enrolled in the VOICES study.
Overall Study
STARTED
80
Overall Study
COMPLETED
80
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

This is based off of those who do not live alone (N=53) out of the 80 participants who completed VOICES.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Older Adults in Primary Care Setting
n=80 Participants
The number of eligible older adults enrolled in the Virtual cOaching in making Informed Choices on Elder Mistreatment Self-Disclosure (VOICES) study in the primary care setting.
Age, Continuous
75.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.87 • n=80 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
49 Participants
n=80 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants
n=80 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
n=80 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
76 Participants
n=80 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=80 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=80 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
n=80 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=80 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
13 Participants
n=80 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
66 Participants
n=80 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=80 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=80 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
80 participants
n=80 Participants
Education
High School not Completed
3 Participants
n=80 Participants
Education
High School Graduate or GED
10 Participants
n=80 Participants
Education
Some college or associate's degree program
14 Participants
n=80 Participants
Education
Associate's Degree
7 Participants
n=80 Participants
Education
College degree (bachelor's program)
9 Participants
n=80 Participants
Education
Graduate degree (master's program)
26 Participants
n=80 Participants
Education
Doctorate or professional degree
11 Participants
n=80 Participants
Household Income
Less than 25k
11 Participants
n=80 Participants
Household Income
Between 25k to 34k
3 Participants
n=80 Participants
Household Income
Between 35k to 49k
3 Participants
n=80 Participants
Household Income
Between 50k to 74k
15 Participants
n=80 Participants
Household Income
Between 75k to 99k
6 Participants
n=80 Participants
Household Income
Between 100k to 149k
14 Participants
n=80 Participants
Household Income
More than 150k
15 Participants
n=80 Participants
Household Income
Refused/Unknown
13 Participants
n=80 Participants
Marital Status
Single or Never Married
11 Participants
n=80 Participants
Marital Status
Widowed
8 Participants
n=80 Participants
Marital Status
Married or Co-habituating
45 Participants
n=80 Participants
Marital Status
Divorced
13 Participants
n=80 Participants
Marital Status
Separated
3 Participants
n=80 Participants
Marital Status
Other
0 Participants
n=80 Participants
Marital Status
Refused/Unknown
0 Participants
n=80 Participants
Employment Status
Retired/Not Employed
61 Participants
n=80 Participants
Employment Status
Part-time
6 Participants
n=80 Participants
Employment Status
Full-time
13 Participants
n=80 Participants
Living Arrangement
In my home
74 Participants
n=80 Participants
Living Arrangement
In someone else's home
2 Participants
n=80 Participants
Living Arrangement
Assisted living
4 Participants
n=80 Participants
Number of Household Members
2 persons
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.84 • n=53 Participants • This is based off of those who do not live alone (N=53) out of the 80 participants who completed VOICES.
Internet Usage
Every Day
63 Participants
n=80 Participants
Internet Usage
1-2 Times a Week
4 Participants
n=80 Participants
Internet Usage
1-2 Times a Month
2 Participants
n=80 Participants
Internet Usage
Rarely
11 Participants
n=80 Participants
Confidence in Using Technology
6.74 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.83 • n=80 Participants
Has Living Will
Yes
45 Participants
n=80 Participants
Has Living Will
No
30 Participants
n=80 Participants
Has Living Will
Unknown
5 Participants
n=80 Participants
Veteran Status
Yes
10 Participants
n=80 Participants
Veteran Status
No
70 Participants
n=80 Participants
Has Health Care Assistant
Yes
71 Participants
n=80 Participants
Has Health Care Assistant
No
6 Participants
n=80 Participants
Has Health Care Assistant
Unknown
3 Participants
n=80 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 5-10 minutes before VOICES intervention use.

Participation will be determined by the number of patients enrolled in VOICES. Successful enrollment of 80 older adults (N=80).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Older Adults Approached for the Study
n=97 Participants
The number of older adults approached for the study in the primary care setting.
Participation
80 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 5-10 minutes directly following VOICES intervention.

Usage will be determined by the number of patients enrolled in the study that complete the VOICES tool. Our target is to enroll 80 older adults (N=80).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Older Adults Approached for the Study
n=80 Participants
The number of older adults approached for the study in the primary care setting.
Usage
80 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 5-10 minutes directly following VOICES intervention use.

Participant satisfaction will be measured using post-use satisfaction survey. Responses will be measured via two 5-point Likert scales where generally higher values represent better outcomes: Scale 1- Satisfaction: Where 1= "Very Dissatisfied", 2= "Dissatisfied", 3= "Neutral", 4= "Satisfied", and 5= "Very Satisfied". Scale 2- Agreement: Where 1= "Strongly Disagree", 2= "Disagree", 3= "Neutral", 4= "Agree", and and 5= "Strongly Agree".

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Older Adults Approached for the Study
n=80 Participants
The number of older adults approached for the study in the primary care setting.
Acceptability
Level of confidentiality and privacy provided while using VOICES (Scale 1)
4.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
Acceptability
The time it took to complete using the VOICES tool (Scale 1)
4.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.69
Acceptability
Ability to complete VOICES on their own on the iPad, without staff assistance (Scale 1)
4.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
Acceptability
Time to complete the tool on the iPad was short (Scale 2)
4.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
Acceptability
Participant felt engaged in the tool throughout the process (Scale 2)
4.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
Acceptability
Audio and visual aids of the tool were helpful (Scale 2)
4.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
Acceptability
Participant felt fonts, size and colors of text in the tool were appropriate and readable (Scale 2)
4.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.72
Acceptability
Using this tool on the iPad was very easy (Scale 2)
4.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66
Acceptability
I was comfortable answering questions on the iPad (Scale 2)
4.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.61
Acceptability
Using the iPad and the headphones provided more privacy (Scale 2)
4.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
Acceptability
Participant feels comfortable discussing mistreatment with a doctor or medical professional (Scale2)
4.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.78
Acceptability
VOICES is appropriate for learning about mistreatment (Scale 2)
4.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.67
Acceptability
VOICES is appropriate to be used in primary care setting (Scale 2)
4.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
Acceptability
The participant was able to complete VOICES on the iPad on their own (Scale 2)
4.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
Acceptability
Using VOICES on the iPad was a frustrating experience (Scale 2)
1.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
Acceptability
The instructions provided by VOICES digital coach were clear and easy to follow (Scale 2)
4.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.56
Acceptability
Participant confidence understanding mistreatment and resources after using VOICES (Scale 2)
4.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
Acceptability
Participant feels safer after using VOICES on the iPad (Scale 2)
3.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
Acceptability
The participant learned new, useful things about elder mistreatment (Scale 2)
4.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
Acceptability
Participant would like to see VOICES used by others in the community (ie. doctor's office) (Scale 2)
4.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 5-10 minutes directly following VOICES intervention use.

Demand will be assess through examining how likely will VOICES be used by patients. To do this, the size of target population of elder mistreatment (EM) victims in the Primary Care setting will be measured by the percent who screen positive for EM and the percent who receive the Brief Negotiation Interview (BNI) portion of VOICES. The BNI is a method designed to enhance identifying EM among older adults-- the process intends to encourage reflection of the user with their behaviors and whether they are willing to seek change by identifying with and reporting their abuse.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Older Adults Approached for the Study
n=80 Participants
The number of older adults approached for the study in the primary care setting.
Demand
Participants who screened positive for suspicion of elder mistreatment
6 Participants
Demand
Participants who self-identified with elder mistreatment
3 Participants
Demand
Participants who self-reported elder mistreatment
3 Participants
Demand
Participants who received the Brief Negotiated Interview (BNI) pathway
4 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Actual time duration is assessed during VOICES use by the computer program (the actual duration of the patient's time using VOICES). Estimation of completed time is completed 5-10 minutes directly following VOICES intervention use.

Practicality will be assessed by observing the ease of VOICES use by patients. To do this, a series of steps will be watched to determine the efficiency of implementation measured by the average time (1) to consent \& orient participants to the tool and (2) needed to complete VOICES documented by the Research Assistant; and (3) patients perceived time of VOICES as measured on post-survey. Each of these will be reported as part of the overall outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Older Adults Approached for the Study
n=80 Participants
The number of older adults approached for the study in the primary care setting.
Practicality
Actual VOICES Duration
9.31 minutes
Standard Deviation 4.33
Practicality
Actual Consent Duration
14.09 minutes
Standard Deviation 4.54
Practicality
Participant estimated time to completion
18.38 minutes
Standard Deviation 11.55

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Measure collected 5-10 minutes directly following VOICES intervention.

To look at how many patients changed their readiness to disclose after completing the Brief Negotiation Interview (BNI)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Older Adults Approached for the Study
n=4 Participants
The number of older adults approached for the study in the primary care setting.
Efficacy of the Brief Negotiation Interview
1 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Measure collected up to directly following VOICES intervention to 1 week following VOICES intervention.

Population: The number of participants who used VOICES to completion and screened positive for suspicion of elder mistreatment (n=6).

To understand the accuracy of the VOICES tool, a preliminary evaluation of the accuracy of VOICES as a screening tool in correctly classifying elder mistreatment (EM) cases that were referred to Adult Protective Services (APS). The percent correct classification will be reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Older Adults Approached for the Study
n=6 Participants
The number of older adults approached for the study in the primary care setting.
Accuracy
Participants substantiated for elder mistreatment by the social worker
6 Participants
Accuracy
Participants referred to APS by the social worker
1 Participants
Accuracy
Cases referred to APS that were substantiated and opened
1 Participants

Adverse Events

Older Adults in Primary Care Setting

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Fuad Abujarad

Yale University

Phone: +1 (203) 737-5088

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place