SRS Compared With FSRS for Treatment of Intact Metastatic Brain Disease, FRACTIONATE Trial

NCT ID: NCT05222620

Last Updated: 2026-01-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

69 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-03-14

Study Completion Date

2028-02-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This phase II trial compares the effect of single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery to fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of patients with cancer that has spread to the brain (metastatic brain disease). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a form of radiation therapy that focuses high-power energy on a small area of the body. This trial is being done to determine if single (one) fraction stereotactic radiosurgery is better than fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery or vice versa in controlling tumor and side effects in patients with tumors that have spread to the brain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To ascertain if the composite endpoint of cumulative treatment failure, defined by time to either local failure or symptomatic radiation brain necrosis of the largest brain metastasis (target lesion), is increased with fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (FSRS) compared to single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To ascertain whether there is improved overall survival in patients who undergo FSRS compared to patients who receive SSRS.

II. To tabulate and descriptively compare the post-treatment adverse events associated with the interventions, including the potential impact of immunotherapy and targeted therapy.

III. To compare rates of radiation necrosis in patients who receive FSRS to patients who receive SSRS.

IV. To evaluate if there is any difference in central nervous system (CNS) failure patterns (e.g. local, distant brain failure) in patients who receive FSRS compared to patients who receive SSRS.

V. To ascertain whether FSRS prolongs time to neurologic death as compared to SRS.

VI. To determine whether there is improved patient reported outcomes (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy \[FACT\]-Brain Symptom Index \[FBrSI\]-24) including quality of life for patients who receive FSRS compared to patients who receive SSRS.

VII. To evaluate if there is any difference in CNS failure patterns (e.g. local, distant brain failure) and symptomatic radiation necrosis rates in patients who are treated with gamma knife compared to patients who are treated with a linear accelerator platform.

VIII. To determine whether differences in time to local failure, time to necrosis, or their composite endpoint cumulative treatment failure differs between treatment arms (or other patient or treatment factors) when analyzed on a "per lesion" basis rather than the per patient basis utilized for the primary endpoint.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM A: Patients undergo single fraction SRS. Patients also undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at screening and during follow up.

ARM B: Patients undergo fractionated SRS. Patients also undergo MRI at screening and during follow up.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 3 months, every 3 months for 2 years, and then every 6 months for 3 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Metastatic Malignant Neoplasm in the Brain Metastatic Malignant Solid Neoplasm

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm A (single fraction SRS)

Patients undergo single fraction SRS.

Group Type OTHER

Questionnaire Administration

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Intervention Type RADIATION

Undergo single fraction SRS

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo MRI

Arm B (fractionated SRS)

Patients undergo fractionated SRS.

Group Type OTHER

Questionnaire Administration

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Intervention Type RADIATION

Undergo fractionated SRS

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo MRI

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Questionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

Intervention Type OTHER

Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Undergo single fraction SRS

Intervention Type RADIATION

Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Undergo fractionated SRS

Intervention Type RADIATION

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Undergo MRI

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Stereotactic External Beam Irradiation stereotactic external-beam radiation therapy Stereotactic Radiation Therapy Stereotactic Radiotherapy stereotaxic radiation therapy stereotaxic radiosurgery SRS Stereotactic External Beam Irradiation stereotactic external-beam radiation therapy Stereotactic Radiation Therapy Stereotactic Radiotherapy stereotaxic radiation therapy stereotaxic radiosurgery SRS Magnetic Resonance Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Magnetic resonance imaging (procedure) Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan Medical Imaging Magnetic Resonance / Nuclear Magnetic Resonance MR MRI MR Imaging MRI Scan MRIs NMR Imaging NMRI nuclear magnetic resonance imaging sMRI Structural MRI

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \>= 18 years old
* Presence of presumed brain metastases from an extra-cerebral tumor site (e.g. lung, breast, prostate, etc.)

* Note: Dural based metastases (e.g. commonly seen in breast cancer) are eligible
* Size of brain metastases

* At least one intact metastasis (not previously treated with radiosurgery) must measure \>= 2.0 cm and =\< 4.0 cm in maximal extent on the contrasted pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scan obtained =\< 28 days prior to registration
* If the largest lesion measures \>= 2.0 to =\< 4.0 cm in maximal extent the patient will be randomized
* Able to undergo contrast enhanced MRI brain
* Negative urine or serum pregnancy test completed =\< 7 days prior to registration, for women of childbearing potential only
* Patient is willing and able to provide written informed consent or have a legally Authorized Representative (LAR) who is responsible for the care and well-being of the potential study participant provide consent.
* Karnofsky performance status (KPS) \>= 50
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score of (PS) \>= 2
* Past radiosurgery or resection is allowed as long as no definitive evidence of progression in these locations

* Note: Repeat radiosurgery to the same location/lesion is not allowed on this protocol

Exclusion Criteria

* Any patient who has received previous whole brain radiation
* Any brain metastasis that is located in the brainstem measuring \>= 2.0 cm in maximal extent
* Any patient with definitive evidence of leptomeningeal metastasis (LMD)

* NOTE: For the purposes of exclusion, LMD is a clinical diagnosis, defined as positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology and/or unequivocal radiologic or clinical evidence of leptomeningeal involvement. Patients with leptomeningeal symptoms in the setting of leptomeningeal enhancement by imaging (MRI) would be considered to have LMD even in the absence of positive CSF cytology, unless a parenchymal lesion can adequately explain the neurologic symptoms and/or signs. In contrast, an asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patient with mild or nonspecific leptomeningeal enhancement (MRI) would not be considered to have LMD. In that patient, CSF sampling is not required to formally exclude LMD, but can be performed at the investigator's discretion based on level of clinical suspicion
* Any patient with an intact brain metastasis measuring \> 4.0 cm
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Paul D. Brown, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mayo Clinic in Arizona

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Mayo Clinic in Florida

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Mayo Clinic Health System in Albert Lea

Albert Lea, Minnesota, United States

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Mayo Clinic Health Systems-Mankato

Mankato, Minnesota, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Mayo Clinic Health System-Eau Claire Clinic

Eau Claire, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Mayo Clinic Health System-Franciscan Healthcare

La Crosse, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Clinical Trials Referral Office

Role: CONTACT

855-776-0015

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Clinical Trials Referral Office

Role: primary

855-776-0015

Clinical Trials Referral Office

Role: primary

855-776-0015

Clinical Trials Referral Office

Role: primary

855-776-0015

Lori Rhodes

Role: backup

507-284-0063

Clinical Trials Referral Office

Role: primary

855-776-0015

Lori Rhodes

Role: backup

507-284-0063

Clinical Trials Referral Office

Role: primary

855-776-0015

Clinical Trials Referral Office

Role: primary

855-776-0015

Lori Rhodes

Role: backup

507-284-0063

Clinical Trials Referral Office

Role: primary

855-776-0015

Lori Rhodes

Role: backup

507-284-0063

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCI-2021-14230

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

21-003768

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

GMROR2163

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.