SRS Compared With FSRS for Treatment of Intact Metastatic Brain Disease, FRACTIONATE Trial
NCT ID: NCT05222620
Last Updated: 2026-01-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE2
69 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-03-14
2028-02-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pre-Operative or Post-Operative Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Treating Patients With Operative Metastatic Brain Tumors
NCT03750227
Single Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery Compared With Fractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Treating Patients With Resected Metastatic Brain Disease
NCT04114981
Study of Fractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery to Treat Large Brain Metastases
NCT00928226
Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy (FSRT) in Treatment of Brain Metastases
NCT02187822
Stereotactic Radiosurgery After Surgery in Treating Patients With Brain Metastases
NCT00814463
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. To ascertain if the composite endpoint of cumulative treatment failure, defined by time to either local failure or symptomatic radiation brain necrosis of the largest brain metastasis (target lesion), is increased with fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (FSRS) compared to single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To ascertain whether there is improved overall survival in patients who undergo FSRS compared to patients who receive SSRS.
II. To tabulate and descriptively compare the post-treatment adverse events associated with the interventions, including the potential impact of immunotherapy and targeted therapy.
III. To compare rates of radiation necrosis in patients who receive FSRS to patients who receive SSRS.
IV. To evaluate if there is any difference in central nervous system (CNS) failure patterns (e.g. local, distant brain failure) in patients who receive FSRS compared to patients who receive SSRS.
V. To ascertain whether FSRS prolongs time to neurologic death as compared to SRS.
VI. To determine whether there is improved patient reported outcomes (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy \[FACT\]-Brain Symptom Index \[FBrSI\]-24) including quality of life for patients who receive FSRS compared to patients who receive SSRS.
VII. To evaluate if there is any difference in CNS failure patterns (e.g. local, distant brain failure) and symptomatic radiation necrosis rates in patients who are treated with gamma knife compared to patients who are treated with a linear accelerator platform.
VIII. To determine whether differences in time to local failure, time to necrosis, or their composite endpoint cumulative treatment failure differs between treatment arms (or other patient or treatment factors) when analyzed on a "per lesion" basis rather than the per patient basis utilized for the primary endpoint.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM A: Patients undergo single fraction SRS. Patients also undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at screening and during follow up.
ARM B: Patients undergo fractionated SRS. Patients also undergo MRI at screening and during follow up.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 3 months, every 3 months for 2 years, and then every 6 months for 3 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm A (single fraction SRS)
Patients undergo single fraction SRS.
Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies
Stereotactic Radiosurgery
Undergo single fraction SRS
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Undergo MRI
Arm B (fractionated SRS)
Patients undergo fractionated SRS.
Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies
Stereotactic Radiosurgery
Undergo fractionated SRS
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Undergo MRI
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies
Stereotactic Radiosurgery
Undergo single fraction SRS
Stereotactic Radiosurgery
Undergo fractionated SRS
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Undergo MRI
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presence of presumed brain metastases from an extra-cerebral tumor site (e.g. lung, breast, prostate, etc.)
* Note: Dural based metastases (e.g. commonly seen in breast cancer) are eligible
* Size of brain metastases
* At least one intact metastasis (not previously treated with radiosurgery) must measure \>= 2.0 cm and =\< 4.0 cm in maximal extent on the contrasted pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scan obtained =\< 28 days prior to registration
* If the largest lesion measures \>= 2.0 to =\< 4.0 cm in maximal extent the patient will be randomized
* Able to undergo contrast enhanced MRI brain
* Negative urine or serum pregnancy test completed =\< 7 days prior to registration, for women of childbearing potential only
* Patient is willing and able to provide written informed consent or have a legally Authorized Representative (LAR) who is responsible for the care and well-being of the potential study participant provide consent.
* Karnofsky performance status (KPS) \>= 50
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score of (PS) \>= 2
* Past radiosurgery or resection is allowed as long as no definitive evidence of progression in these locations
* Note: Repeat radiosurgery to the same location/lesion is not allowed on this protocol
Exclusion Criteria
* Any brain metastasis that is located in the brainstem measuring \>= 2.0 cm in maximal extent
* Any patient with definitive evidence of leptomeningeal metastasis (LMD)
* NOTE: For the purposes of exclusion, LMD is a clinical diagnosis, defined as positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology and/or unequivocal radiologic or clinical evidence of leptomeningeal involvement. Patients with leptomeningeal symptoms in the setting of leptomeningeal enhancement by imaging (MRI) would be considered to have LMD even in the absence of positive CSF cytology, unless a parenchymal lesion can adequately explain the neurologic symptoms and/or signs. In contrast, an asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patient with mild or nonspecific leptomeningeal enhancement (MRI) would not be considered to have LMD. In that patient, CSF sampling is not required to formally exclude LMD, but can be performed at the investigator's discretion based on level of clinical suspicion
* Any patient with an intact brain metastasis measuring \> 4.0 cm
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Paul D. Brown, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Mayo Clinic in Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Mayo Clinic Health System in Albert Lea
Albert Lea, Minnesota, United States
Mayo Clinic Health Systems-Mankato
Mankato, Minnesota, United States
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Mayo Clinic Health System-Eau Claire Clinic
Eau Claire, Wisconsin, United States
Mayo Clinic Health System-Franciscan Healthcare
La Crosse, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Mayo Clinic Clinical Trials
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2021-14230
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
21-003768
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
GMROR2163
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.