Learning How to Recover From Stress - Pilot RCT

NCT ID: NCT05220592

Last Updated: 2022-02-02

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 69 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2018-02-15
• Study Completion Date: 2020-05-26

Brief Summary

This randomized, controlled pilot trial evaluated the efficacy of a brief internet-based recovery training intervention targeting distressed employees. This pilot trial is one of the first to examine a brief recovery training program's efficacy, suggesting that employees across a wide range of professions could learn how to recover from elevated stress symptoms. This type of accessible and brief recovery intervention might shape the future of stress prevention, but more research is needed with larger samples before further conclusions can be drawn.

Detailed Description

In recent years, work-related stress and burnout have received more attention, with a higher prevalence observed within the working population. Today, every fourth employee has experienced stress during most of their working days. Employees exposed to prolonged stress in their work situations experience more strain and suffer from poor well-being; higher risk of severe health implications, such as coronary artery disease; and problems in work participation, such as sickness absences, including long-term sick leave.

Empirical research suggests that recovery from work is important in reducing the negative effects on employees from stress and strain, as well as preserving their well-being and work performance. Recovery refers to the restoration processes during which a person's stress level returns to its pre-stress level. Recovery as a process refers to the activities and experiences that elicit change in stress and strain indicators. Recovery as an outcome captures a person's psychological or physiological state reached after a recovery period (e.g., at the end of a workday). Confirmatory factor analysis has proposed four distinct experiences in recovering from work processes: psychological detachment; relaxation; mastery; and control. Extant studies confirm that these experiences are related positively to well-being indicators such as the Recovery Experience Questionnaire.

Although extensive research has been devoted to stress intervention programs, and evidence suggest that these are effective in reducing stress within the working population, few studies have evaluated interventions aimed at stress prevention, e.g., by removing stressors and/or enhancing well-being factors, such as recovery. Most stress interventions have focused on reducing participants' cognitive, emotional, and behavioral symptoms when coping with stress. However, some promising results on stress prevention have been observed from recovery training programs.

Despite the evidence on the efficacy of stress management interventions and some promising results from recovery training interventions , only a small percentage of distressed employees actually receive stress interventions. This calls for further development and evaluation of interventions that are accessible and has the potential in preventing chronic stress in the working population.

The internet has the potential to disseminate interventions broadly, and a growing body of literature has demonstrated internet-based stress interventions' efficacy, with small to moderate effects on outcomes from stress, burnout, insomnia, depression, and anxiety.

The present, controlled pilot study aim to examine the efficacy of a brief, five-week, internet-based recovery training program for employees experiencing elevated symptoms of stress and/or a stress-related disorder burnout in a randomized, controlled pilot trial. We hypothesize that the internet-based recovery program would produce greater improvements in recovery experiences (primary outcome) compared with a wait-list control group. We also hypothesize that the intervention group will differ with regard to important health-related (perceived stress, burnout, exhaustion, depression, alcohol consumption, and quality of life) and work-related (work experience, work ability, sickness absences) outcomes. Finally, we investigate whether the initially achieved changes in the intervention group would remain stable at six- and 12-month follow-ups.

Conditions

Adjustment Disorders

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: PREVENTION
• Blinding Strategy: SINGLE

Study Groups

Internet-based recovery training program (n=35)

The iRTP was based on recovery experiences (psychological detachment, relaxation, mastery, and control), converted into a recovery training intervention inspired by Hahn et al. (2011). The iRTP comprised five modules distributed over five weeks, with modules lasting 60-120 minutes per week.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Internet-based recovery training program

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

The iRTP was based on recovery experiences (psychological detachment, relaxation, mastery, and control), converted into a recovery training intervention, and inspired by Hahn et al. (2011). The iRTP comprised five modules distributed over five weeks, with modules lasting 60-120 minutes per week. Each module contained psycho education, worksheets, images, cases, audio and video files, and homework assignments.

Wait-list control group (n=34)

Wait-list control group received equal and parallell assessment and eligibility procedure as the experimental conditions. Wait-list control group gained access to iCBT/W-iCBT program after the six months follow-up.

Group Type: NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Internet-based recovery training program

The iRTP was based on recovery experiences (psychological detachment, relaxation, mastery, and control), converted into a recovery training intervention, and inspired by Hahn et al. (2011). The iRTP comprised five modules distributed over five weeks, with modules lasting 60-120 minutes per week. Each module contained psycho education, worksheets, images, cases, audio and video files, and homework assignments.

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

All participants were volunteers. To be eligible for the study, each participant had to fulfill the following criteria:

• at least 18 years old; (ii) fluent in Swedish
• have access to a computer or handheld device with internet access
• currently be employed
• >14 points on the Perceived Stress Scale
• <5 points on the Shirom Melamed Burnout Questionnaire (SMBQ)
• <20 points on the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale-Self-Rated (MADRS-S)
• <21 points on the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
• <14 points on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT).

Exclusion Criteria

Participants were excluded from the study if they:

• currently were in treatment for stress or burnout;
• currently were suffering from bipolar disorder, psychosis, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), eating disorders, substance abuse, severe forms of depression, anxiety disorder or personality disorders as assessed in a telephone interview (MINI)
• suicidal ideation based on Item 9 on the MADRS-S.
• If on medication (e.g., antidepressants or sleep medication) this should be held constant medication constant during the study period.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 70 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Linkoeping University

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Gerhard Andersson

Professor

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Gerhard Andersson, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Linkoeping University

Locations

Department of Behavioral Sciences and Learning, Linköping University

Linköping, Östergötland County, Sweden

Countries

Sweden

References

Asplund RP, Carvallo F, Christensson H, Videsater E, Haggman A, Ljotsson B, Carlbring P, Andersson G. Learning how to recover from stress: Results from an internet-based randomized controlled pilot trial. Internet Interv. 2023 Oct 17;34:100681. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100681. eCollection 2023 Dec.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 38023967 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

iStress4

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id