Changes in Immunologic Parameters Following the Addition of Fostemsavir in Virologically Suppressed Immunologic Non-responders Living With HIV-the RECOVER Study
NCT ID: NCT05220358
Last Updated: 2025-08-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE4
25 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-06-15
2026-02-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Long-acting (LA) Cabotegravir (CAB) + Rilpivirine (RPV) LA When Given to Participants With Detectable HIV-1
NCT06694805
A Study to Investigate the Use of VH3810109 With or Without Fostemsavir (FTR) to Reduce the Size and Activity of the Viral Reservoir in People Living With HIV
NCT07053384
GW640385 Plus Ritonavir And NRTIs For 48 Weeks In HIV-1 Infected Adults
NCT00257621
Immune and Viral Status of HIV-Infected Patients After Stopping Combination Antiretroviral Therapy
NCT00001899
Same-Day HIV Testing and Treatment Initiation to Improve Retention in Care
NCT01900080
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
These data have raised questions about whether FTR has the ability to promote CD4+ T-cell recovery independently of HIV viral suppression. This first-in-class attachment inhibitor has a unique mechanism of action, the active moiety temsavir binds directly to viral gp120 preventing HIV-1 from interacting with the host immune cell. This process leaves the CD4+ T-cell untouched and it is hypothesized that temsavir binding to gp120 inhibits gp120-mediated apoptosis of CD4+ T-cells and does not allow for activation of other downstream inflammatory pathways that may contribute to CD4+ T-cell death \[2\]. Other clinical trials of ARVs used in heavily-treatment experienced populations, including those with ibalizumab, dolutegravir, enfuvirtide, maraviroc and etravirine have not demonstrated the degree of CD4+ T-cell recovery observed in the BRIGHTE study \[5-9\]. Cumulatively these data suggest that FOS may be of benefit in individuals who experience suboptimal immunologic recovery despite achieving viral suppression also known as immunologic non-responders (INRs).
Since 1997, researchers have struggled to identify agents that can restore CD4+T-cell counts and reduce immune activation and inflammation in virologically suppressed INRs \[10\]. Despite achieving ARV efficacy, this group continues to be at higher risk of disease progression to AIDS, complications related to opportunistic infections (OIs) and death \[10, 11\]. Recently, data has also revealed that persistent immune activation and inflammation also contributes to higher rates of non-AIDS related events such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hyperglycemia and cardiovascular disease \[11\]. Multiple strategies to address CD4+ T-cell depletion and persistent immune activation among INRs have been investigated over the years, these include the use of adjunctive maraviroc, immune modulators, statins, sitagliptin, niacin, antivirals, nutritional supplements and growth hormone in combination with ART \[10, 12-14\]. Unfortunately, none of these has demonstrated consistent efficacy and some studies have even revealed loss of virologic control and the occurrence of serious adverse events (AEs) when adjunct therapies were used \[10\]. These findings highlight an urgent need to identify novel options as adjunct therapy for CD4+T-cell recovery and to reduce inflammation and immune activation among INRs. An ideal agent for this purpose would be well-tolerated, have few DDIs with ARVs and have a low risk of contributing to virologic failure when combined with ARVs. Based on data from the BRIGHTE study, we hypothesize that FTR would be efficacious at establishing significant immune reconstitution in INRs without compromising virologic efficacy or patient safety.
Here, we propose a self-controlled case series to evaluate the change in immunologic parameters following the addition of FTR to baseline ARV regimens among virologically suppressed INRs through 48 weeks of treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
FTR+suppressive regimen
addition of fostemsavir 600 mg PO BID to the stable suppressive HIV regimen in immunologic non responders
Fostemsavir 600 MG [Rukobia]
FTR 600 mg PO BID added to daily suppressive HIV regimen
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fostemsavir 600 MG [Rukobia]
FTR 600 mg PO BID added to daily suppressive HIV regimen
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged 18-65
* Stable insurance plan
* Documented plasma HIV-1 RNA \< 50 c/mL x 2 within the last year prior to screening
* Must be on a stable ARV regimen for ≥6 months prior to screening
* CD4+T-cell count\<350 cells/mm3 while on ARVs for at least 2 years
* Must be willing to add FTR 600 mg twice daily to their current antiretroviral regimen
* Must have attended ≥ 2 clinic visits in the 12 months prior to screening
Exclusion Criteria
* Active HBV or HCV co-infection
* Unstable liver disease or Child-Pugh C liver disease
* History of autoimmune disease
* History of any malignancy ≤5 years
* History of radiation or cytotoxic chemotherapy
* Use of systemic corticosteroids or other immunomodulatory agents in the last 14 days prior to study entry
* Confirmed QT value \> 500 msec at Screening or Day 1 or confirmed QTcF value \> 470 msec for women and \> 450 msec for men at Screening or Day 1
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ViiV Healthcare
INDUSTRY
Orlando Immunology Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Charlotte-Paige M Rolle, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Orlando Immunology Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Orlando Immunology Center
Orlando, Florida, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
OIC_010
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.