Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Safety and Tolerability Study of Sotrovimab (VIR-7831) Prophylaxis Against COVID-19 in Immunocompromised Individuals (NCT NCT05210101)
NCT ID: NCT05210101
Last Updated: 2024-08-15
Results Overview
Proportion of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events, serious adverse events, and adverse events of specific interest (including infusion-related and hypersensitivity reactions, anti-drug antibody (ADA) levels, and antibody-dependent enhancement
COMPLETED
PHASE2
93 participants
36 weeks after the second dose of sotrovimab
2024-08-15
Participant Flow
There were no significant events in the study occurring after enrollment and prior to assignment into a group - this was a single arm safety and tolerability study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Sotrovimab
Two intravenous (IV) doses of sotrovimab were administered in total - the first on Treatment Day 1 (500mg) and the second on Treatment Day 2, approximately 8-14 weeks after the first dose, at a higher 2000mg dose, in light of the reduced antiviral susceptibility of the BA.2 subvariant to sotrovimab, with the dosing interval determined by theoretical modeling of the duration of efficacy of sotrovimab as antiviral prophylaxis based on the rising prevalence of the Omicron BA.2 subvariant.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
93
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
88
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Safety and Tolerability Study of Sotrovimab (VIR-7831) Prophylaxis Against COVID-19 in Immunocompromised Individuals
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Sotrovimab
n=93 Participants
Two intravenous (IV) doses of sotrovimab were administered in total - the first on Treatment Day 1 (500mg) and the second on Treatment Day 2, approximately 8-14 weeks after the first dose, at a higher 2000mg dose, in light of the reduced antiviral susceptibility of the BA.2 subvariant to sotrovimab, with the dosing interval determined by theoretical modeling of the duration of efficacy of sotrovimab as antiviral prophylaxis based on the rising prevalence of the Omicron BA.2 subvariant.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
66.4 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
48 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
85 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
85 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
93 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 36 weeks after the second dose of sotrovimabPopulation: immunocompromised patients with impaired humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2
Proportion of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events, serious adverse events, and adverse events of specific interest (including infusion-related and hypersensitivity reactions, anti-drug antibody (ADA) levels, and antibody-dependent enhancement
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sotrovimab
n=93 Participants
Two intravenous (IV) doses of sotrovimab were be administered in total - the first on Treatment Day 1 (500mg) and the second on Treatment Day 2, approximately 8-14 weeks after the first dose, at a higher 2000mg dose, in light of the reduced antiviral susceptibility of the BA.2 subvariant to sotrovimab, with the dosing interval determined by theoretical modeling of the duration of efficacy of sotrovimab as antiviral prophylaxis based on the rising prevalence of the Omicron BA.2 subvariant.
|
|---|---|
|
Proportion of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events of Specific Interest
Proportion of subjects with treatment-emergent grade 3-4 adverse events, per DAIDS grading criteria.
|
28 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events of Specific Interest
Proportion of subjects with antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE)
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events of Specific Interest
Proportion of study subjects with treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAE).
|
27 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events of Specific Interest
Proportion of study subjects with infusion-related and hypersensitivity reactions
|
3 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events of Specific Interest
Proportion of study subjects with the development of antidrug antibody (ADA) levels
|
3 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Within 1 hour of the first dose infusion of sotrovimab and on day 11, 29, and 59. Prior to the second dose, within 1 hour of the second dose infusion of sotrovimab, and 11, 29, 59, and 168 days afterPopulation: immunocompromised patients with impaired humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2, range reported is a 5-95th percentile
Evaluation of half-life of sotrovimab in immunocompromised patients with impaired humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sotrovimab
n=93 Participants
Two intravenous (IV) doses of sotrovimab were be administered in total - the first on Treatment Day 1 (500mg) and the second on Treatment Day 2, approximately 8-14 weeks after the first dose, at a higher 2000mg dose, in light of the reduced antiviral susceptibility of the BA.2 subvariant to sotrovimab, with the dosing interval determined by theoretical modeling of the duration of efficacy of sotrovimab as antiviral prophylaxis based on the rising prevalence of the Omicron BA.2 subvariant.
|
|---|---|
|
Half-life of Sotrovimab in Immunocompromised Patients With Impaired Humoral Immunity Against SARS-CoV-2.
|
67.7 days (half-life)
Interval 47.3 to 95.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 36 weeks after the second dose of sotrovimabPopulation: immunocompromised patients with an impaired humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2
The proportion of study subjects who: (a) develop COVID-19 (of any severity), (b) severe COVID-19, (c) Emergency department (ED) visits, inpatient hospitalization, or ICU hospitalizations within 28 days of a new diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, (d) need for new or increasing supplemental oxygen or mechanical ventilation within 28 days of a new diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, and (e) death due to any cause during the study follow-up period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sotrovimab
n=93 Participants
Two intravenous (IV) doses of sotrovimab were be administered in total - the first on Treatment Day 1 (500mg) and the second on Treatment Day 2, approximately 8-14 weeks after the first dose, at a higher 2000mg dose, in light of the reduced antiviral susceptibility of the BA.2 subvariant to sotrovimab, with the dosing interval determined by theoretical modeling of the duration of efficacy of sotrovimab as antiviral prophylaxis based on the rising prevalence of the Omicron BA.2 subvariant.
|
|---|---|
|
COVID-19-related Outcomes
Patients who developed COVID-19 (of any severity)
|
35 Participants
|
|
COVID-19-related Outcomes
Patients who developed severe COVID-19
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At treatment day 1, at treatment day 2Population: immunocompromised patients with impaired humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2
Health-related quality of life was assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), specifically focusing on the General Health domain. Each question in this domain was scored as follows: For questions 33 and 35, responses were scaled: 1 = 0, 2 = 25, 3 = 50, 4 = 75, and 5 = 100. For questions 1, 34, and 36, responses were scaled: 1 = 100, 2 = 75, 3 = 50, 4 = 25, and 5 = 0. The scores for these five questions were summed to create a composite General Health score, with possible total scores ranging from 0 (indicating the best perceived general health) to 500 (indicating the worst perceived general health). Lower scores indicate better perceived general health. We calculated the mean General Health score at two time points: treatment day 1 and treatment day 2. The reported results reflect the difference between these mean scores, with negative differences indicating improvement and positive differences indicating a decline in p
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sotrovimab
n=93 Participants
Two intravenous (IV) doses of sotrovimab were be administered in total - the first on Treatment Day 1 (500mg) and the second on Treatment Day 2, approximately 8-14 weeks after the first dose, at a higher 2000mg dose, in light of the reduced antiviral susceptibility of the BA.2 subvariant to sotrovimab, with the dosing interval determined by theoretical modeling of the duration of efficacy of sotrovimab as antiviral prophylaxis based on the rising prevalence of the Omicron BA.2 subvariant.
|
|---|---|
|
General Health Quality of Life Measurement
|
-0.60 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.27
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: from covid day 1 to end of hospitalization or covid day 14Population: study subjects who acquired SARS-CoV-2 during the study period
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease Ordinal Scale (NIAD-OS) was assessed at the end of hospitalization or 14 days after the diagnosis of COVID-19. The worst reported scale value was used in the analysis to adequately represent the greatest extent of their COVID-19 infection. NIAID-OS Scale Value Description 1. Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities 2. Not hospitalized, limitation on activities or/or requiring home oxygen 3. Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen, no longer requires ongoing medical care 4. Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen 5. Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen 6. Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices 7. Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) 8. Death
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sotrovimab
n=35 Participants
Two intravenous (IV) doses of sotrovimab were be administered in total - the first on Treatment Day 1 (500mg) and the second on Treatment Day 2, approximately 8-14 weeks after the first dose, at a higher 2000mg dose, in light of the reduced antiviral susceptibility of the BA.2 subvariant to sotrovimab, with the dosing interval determined by theoretical modeling of the duration of efficacy of sotrovimab as antiviral prophylaxis based on the rising prevalence of the Omicron BA.2 subvariant.
|
|---|---|
|
In Patients Who Develop COVID-19, the Greatest Extent of COVID-19 Symptoms, as Assessed Using the 8-point National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Ordinal Scale (NIAID-OS)
|
1 units on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 5.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 36 weeks after the second dose of sotrovimabPopulation: immunocompromised patients with impaired humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2
Assessment of rates of new cellular or antibody-mediated rejection events in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients exposed to sotrovimab.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sotrovimab
n=93 Participants
Two intravenous (IV) doses of sotrovimab were be administered in total - the first on Treatment Day 1 (500mg) and the second on Treatment Day 2, approximately 8-14 weeks after the first dose, at a higher 2000mg dose, in light of the reduced antiviral susceptibility of the BA.2 subvariant to sotrovimab, with the dosing interval determined by theoretical modeling of the duration of efficacy of sotrovimab as antiviral prophylaxis based on the rising prevalence of the Omicron BA.2 subvariant.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With New Cellular or Antibody-mediated Rejection Events
|
0 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 36 weeks after the second dose of sotrovimabPopulation: immunocompromised patients with impaired humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2
Assessment of rates of new-onset or worsening graft-versus-host disease in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients exposed to sotrovimab.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sotrovimab
n=93 Participants
Two intravenous (IV) doses of sotrovimab were be administered in total - the first on Treatment Day 1 (500mg) and the second on Treatment Day 2, approximately 8-14 weeks after the first dose, at a higher 2000mg dose, in light of the reduced antiviral susceptibility of the BA.2 subvariant to sotrovimab, with the dosing interval determined by theoretical modeling of the duration of efficacy of sotrovimab as antiviral prophylaxis based on the rising prevalence of the Omicron BA.2 subvariant.
|
|---|---|
|
New-onset or Worsening Graft-versus-host Disease in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients
|
0 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 36 weeks after the second dose of sotrovimabPopulation: immunocompromised patients with impaired humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2
Assessment of rates of new-onset allograft or stem cell failure requiring retransplantation in HCT recipients exposed to sotrovimab.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sotrovimab
n=93 Participants
Two intravenous (IV) doses of sotrovimab were be administered in total - the first on Treatment Day 1 (500mg) and the second on Treatment Day 2, approximately 8-14 weeks after the first dose, at a higher 2000mg dose, in light of the reduced antiviral susceptibility of the BA.2 subvariant to sotrovimab, with the dosing interval determined by theoretical modeling of the duration of efficacy of sotrovimab as antiviral prophylaxis based on the rising prevalence of the Omicron BA.2 subvariant.
|
|---|---|
|
New-onset Allograft or Stem Cell Failure Requiring Retransplantation in HCT Recipients
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Sotrovimab
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Sotrovimab
n=93 participants at risk
Two intravenous (IV) doses of sotrovimab were be administered in total - the first on Treatment Day 1 (500mg) and the second on Treatment Day 2, approximately 8-14 weeks after the first dose, at a higher 2000mg dose, in light of the reduced antiviral susceptibility of the BA.2 subvariant to sotrovimab, with the dosing interval determined by theoretical modeling of the duration of efficacy of sotrovimab as antiviral prophylaxis based on the rising prevalence of the Omicron BA.2 subvariant.
Sotrovimab: Two intravenous (IV) doses of sotrovimab were administered over the study period, the first 500mg, and the second 2000mg, in light of the reduced antiviral neutralization of sotrovimab against the BA.2 subvariant, which became the dominant variant in between the administration of the two doses.
|
|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile Neutropenia
|
1.1%
1/93 • 68-74 weeks
Study subjects were assessed according to the study calendar in the protocol: regular laboratory testing, scheduled investigator assessments, and scheduled questionnaires.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Heart Failure
|
2.2%
2/93 • 68-74 weeks
Study subjects were assessed according to the study calendar in the protocol: regular laboratory testing, scheduled investigator assessments, and scheduled questionnaires.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Non-St Elevation Myocardial Infarction
|
1.1%
1/93 • 68-74 weeks
Study subjects were assessed according to the study calendar in the protocol: regular laboratory testing, scheduled investigator assessments, and scheduled questionnaires.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis
|
1.1%
1/93 • 68-74 weeks
Study subjects were assessed according to the study calendar in the protocol: regular laboratory testing, scheduled investigator assessments, and scheduled questionnaires.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
|
1.1%
1/93 • 68-74 weeks
Study subjects were assessed according to the study calendar in the protocol: regular laboratory testing, scheduled investigator assessments, and scheduled questionnaires.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Upper GI Bleed
|
1.1%
1/93 • 68-74 weeks
Study subjects were assessed according to the study calendar in the protocol: regular laboratory testing, scheduled investigator assessments, and scheduled questionnaires.
|
|
General disorders
Chest Pain
|
1.1%
1/93 • 68-74 weeks
Study subjects were assessed according to the study calendar in the protocol: regular laboratory testing, scheduled investigator assessments, and scheduled questionnaires.
|
|
General disorders
Non-Cardiac Chest Pain
|
1.1%
1/93 • 68-74 weeks
Study subjects were assessed according to the study calendar in the protocol: regular laboratory testing, scheduled investigator assessments, and scheduled questionnaires.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Empyema
|
1.1%
1/93 • 68-74 weeks
Study subjects were assessed according to the study calendar in the protocol: regular laboratory testing, scheduled investigator assessments, and scheduled questionnaires.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19 infection
|
1.1%
1/93 • 68-74 weeks
Study subjects were assessed according to the study calendar in the protocol: regular laboratory testing, scheduled investigator assessments, and scheduled questionnaires.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
5.4%
5/93 • 68-74 weeks
Study subjects were assessed according to the study calendar in the protocol: regular laboratory testing, scheduled investigator assessments, and scheduled questionnaires.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tracheobronchitis
|
1.1%
1/93 • 68-74 weeks
Study subjects were assessed according to the study calendar in the protocol: regular laboratory testing, scheduled investigator assessments, and scheduled questionnaires.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary Tract Infection
|
1.1%
1/93 • 68-74 weeks
Study subjects were assessed according to the study calendar in the protocol: regular laboratory testing, scheduled investigator assessments, and scheduled questionnaires.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral Infection
|
1.1%
1/93 • 68-74 weeks
Study subjects were assessed according to the study calendar in the protocol: regular laboratory testing, scheduled investigator assessments, and scheduled questionnaires.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Worsening Pneumonia
|
1.1%
1/93 • 68-74 weeks
Study subjects were assessed according to the study calendar in the protocol: regular laboratory testing, scheduled investigator assessments, and scheduled questionnaires.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Wound Infection
|
1.1%
1/93 • 68-74 weeks
Study subjects were assessed according to the study calendar in the protocol: regular laboratory testing, scheduled investigator assessments, and scheduled questionnaires.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Burn Scar In The Bronchus
|
1.1%
1/93 • 68-74 weeks
Study subjects were assessed according to the study calendar in the protocol: regular laboratory testing, scheduled investigator assessments, and scheduled questionnaires.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
1.1%
1/93 • 68-74 weeks
Study subjects were assessed according to the study calendar in the protocol: regular laboratory testing, scheduled investigator assessments, and scheduled questionnaires.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hematuria
|
1.1%
1/93 • 68-74 weeks
Study subjects were assessed according to the study calendar in the protocol: regular laboratory testing, scheduled investigator assessments, and scheduled questionnaires.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchial Obstruction
|
1.1%
1/93 • 68-74 weeks
Study subjects were assessed according to the study calendar in the protocol: regular laboratory testing, scheduled investigator assessments, and scheduled questionnaires.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hemoptysis
|
1.1%
1/93 • 68-74 weeks
Study subjects were assessed according to the study calendar in the protocol: regular laboratory testing, scheduled investigator assessments, and scheduled questionnaires.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory Failure
|
1.1%
1/93 • 68-74 weeks
Study subjects were assessed according to the study calendar in the protocol: regular laboratory testing, scheduled investigator assessments, and scheduled questionnaires.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Sotrovimab
n=93 participants at risk
Two intravenous (IV) doses of sotrovimab were be administered in total - the first on Treatment Day 1 (500mg) and the second on Treatment Day 2, approximately 8-14 weeks after the first dose, at a higher 2000mg dose, in light of the reduced antiviral susceptibility of the BA.2 subvariant to sotrovimab, with the dosing interval determined by theoretical modeling of the duration of efficacy of sotrovimab as antiviral prophylaxis based on the rising prevalence of the Omicron BA.2 subvariant.
Sotrovimab: Two intravenous (IV) doses of sotrovimab were administered over the study period, the first 500mg, and the second 2000mg, in light of the reduced antiviral neutralization of sotrovimab against the BA.2 subvariant, which became the dominant variant in between the administration of the two doses.
|
|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
5.4%
5/93 • 68-74 weeks
Study subjects were assessed according to the study calendar in the protocol: regular laboratory testing, scheduled investigator assessments, and scheduled questionnaires.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Infusion related reaction
|
5.4%
5/93 • 68-74 weeks
Study subjects were assessed according to the study calendar in the protocol: regular laboratory testing, scheduled investigator assessments, and scheduled questionnaires.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60