Neuromuscular Stimulation Versus Intermittent Compression for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Critical Care

NCT ID: NCT05208216

Last Updated: 2025-09-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-11-01

Study Completion Date

2024-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this prospective, randomised, open-label, parallel group, feasibility trial; the investigators will objectively assess whether it is feasible to apply the Geko device to critically ill adults for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared to usual care with intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPCs).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

VTE is a common problem amongst patients in critical care. Current measures include intermittent pneumatic compression devices, used to aid the venous return of blood from the lower limbs. These devices are contraindicated and/or poorly tolerated by some patients. Neuromuscular stimulation of the lower leg muscles might offer a better tolerated and more physiological alternative to IPCs.

In this feasibility trial the investigators will randomly allocate 40 patients to receive either the Geko device (n=20) or IPCs (n=20) as principal means of mechanical VTE prophylaxis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critical Illness Sepsis Acute Illness Venous Thromboembolism

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention arm

Application of the Geko device for mechanical VTE prophylaxis up until day 10 / discharge form critical care (whichever comes sooner).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Geko device

Intervention Type DEVICE

A small battery powered device that provides neuromuscular stimulation to the muscles of the lower leg to enhance venous return from the leg and reduce the risk of patient developing VTE.

Usual care arm

Application of our usual intermittent pneumatic compression devices for mechanical VTE prophylaxis up until day 10 / discharge form critical care (whichever comes sooner).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Flowtron DVT

Intervention Type DEVICE

A pneumatically powered pair of calf boots device that intermittently compress the muscles of the lower leg to enhance venous return from the leg and reduce the risk of patient developing VTE.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Geko device

A small battery powered device that provides neuromuscular stimulation to the muscles of the lower leg to enhance venous return from the leg and reduce the risk of patient developing VTE.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Flowtron DVT

A pneumatically powered pair of calf boots device that intermittently compress the muscles of the lower leg to enhance venous return from the leg and reduce the risk of patient developing VTE.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female aged ≥ 18 years.
* Intact healthy skin at the proposed site of gekoTM device application.
* Within 24 hours of their admission to critical care
* Expected to remain in critical care until the day after tomorrow

Exclusion Criteria

* Use of any concurrent neuro-modulation drug or device (e.g. neuromuscular blocking agents).
* Trauma to the lower limbs that would prevent geko™ from stimulating the common peroneal nerve.
* Inability to palpate the fibula head in order to apply geko device effectively
* Inability to obtain valid written consent from the participant or their designated legal representative
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Firstkind Ltd

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Manchester Academic Health Science Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Manchester Royal Infirmary

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.gekodevices.com/

The Geko Device Homepage

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

B01316

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Compression Device Safety Study on Edema
NCT00732719 COMPLETED PHASE2