Trial Outcomes & Findings for Imipenem/Cilastatin-XNW4107 Versus Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam for Treatment of Participants With Bacterial Pneumonia (XNW4107-302, REITAB-2) (NCT NCT05204563)
NCT ID: NCT05204563
Last Updated: 2025-11-06
Results Overview
The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
450 participants
Day 14
2025-11-06
Participant Flow
Participants with a clinical diagnosis of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP)/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) who met all eligibility criteria, and were assessed by the investigator as requiring 7 up to 14 days of intravenous (IV) antibiotic treatment in the hospital were randomized.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
300
|
150
|
|
Overall Study
Received at Least 1 Dose
|
299
|
150
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
261
|
139
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
39
|
11
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Other than Specified
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
18
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
6
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
12
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Enrolled, Not Treated
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Imipenem/Cilastatin-XNW4107 Versus Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam for Treatment of Participants With Bacterial Pneumonia (XNW4107-302, REITAB-2)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=300 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via intravenous (IV) infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=150 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Total
n=450 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
In utero
|
0 Participants
n=49 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
|
0 Participants
n=49 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Newborns (0-27 days)
|
0 Participants
n=49 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
|
0 Participants
n=49 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Children (2-11 years)
|
0 Participants
n=49 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Adolescents (12-17 years)
|
0 Participants
n=49 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Adults (18-64 years)
|
168 Participants
n=49 Participants
|
86 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
254 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
From 65-84 years
|
121 Participants
n=49 Participants
|
61 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
182 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
85 years and over
|
11 Participants
n=49 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
86 Participants
n=49 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
136 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
214 Participants
n=49 Participants
|
100 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
314 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=49 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
300 Participants
n=49 Participants
|
150 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
450 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=49 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
296 Participants
n=49 Participants
|
149 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
445 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
4 Participants
n=49 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 14Population: Measured in the Modified Intent-To-Treat (MITT) population, which included all participants from the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=150 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=299 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Day 14 All-cause Mortality Rate
|
2.7 percentage of participants
|
3.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 28Population: Measured in the MITT, which included all participants from the ITT who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
The all-cause mortality rate at Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 28.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=150 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=299 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate
|
3.3 percentage of participants
|
7.7 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 14, Day 28Population: Measured in the microbiologic (micro)-MITT population, which included all participants from the MITT who had a Gram-negative pathogen identified at baseline and the pathogen was susceptible to the investigational medicinal product and comparator.
The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=57 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=113 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Micro-MITT Population
Day 28
|
1.8 percentage of participants
|
6.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Micro-MITT Population
Day 14
|
0 percentage of participants
|
3.5 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 14, Day 28Population: Measured in the Extended micro-MITT population, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which was susceptible to either the investigational medicinal product or comparator.
The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=78 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=153 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Extended Micro-MITT
Day 14
|
2.6 percentage of participants
|
3.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Extended Micro-MITT
Day 28
|
3.8 percentage of participants
|
7.2 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 14, Day 28Population: Measured in the CE population, which included all participants from the MITT who received at least 72 hours of IV study treatment, had an appropriate diagnosis of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP)/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), had no important protocol deviations that affected the assessment of clinical outcome, and had no missing nor indeterminate assessment of clinical outcome.
The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=120 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=233 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population
Day 14
|
2.5 percentage of participants
|
1.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population
Day 28
|
3.3 percentage of participants
|
5.6 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 14, Day 28Population: Measured in the ME population, which included all participants from the micro-MITT who received at least 72 hours of IV study treatment, had an appropriate diagnosis of HABP/VABP, had no important protocol deviations that affected the assessment of microbiological outcome, and had no missing nor indeterminate assessment of microbiological outcome. 'n' = participants evaluable at specified timepoint.
The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=51 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=96 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population
Day 14
|
0 percentage of participants
|
2.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population
Day 28
|
2.0 percentage of participants
|
3.1 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 14, Day 28Population: Measured in the CR-MITT Population, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which is resistant to any carbapenem.
The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=23 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=53 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Carbapenem-resistant MITT (CR-MITT) Population
Day 14
|
8.7 percentage of participants
|
1.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Carbapenem-resistant MITT (CR-MITT) Population
Day 28
|
8.7 percentage of participants
|
1.9 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 4, end of treatment (EOT) (up to Day 14), Test-of-Cure (TOC) (Day 21), and Late Follow-up (LFU) (Day 28)Population: Measured in the MITT, which included all participants from the ITT who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For end of treatment (EOT) or test-of-cure (TOC) visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=150 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=299 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT Population
Day 4
|
56.0 percentage of participants
|
59.2 percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT Population
EOT (up to Day 14)
|
71.3 percentage of participants
|
74.6 percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT Population
TOC (Day 21)
|
63.3 percentage of participants
|
62.9 percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT Population
LFU (Day 28)
|
56.7 percentage of participants
|
58.9 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 4, EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Population: Measured in the micro-MITT, which included all participants from the MITT who had a Gram-negative pathogen identified at baseline and the pathogen was susceptible to the investigational medicinal product and comparator.
Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=57 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=113 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT Population
Day 4
|
56.1 percentage of participants
|
54.0 percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT Population
EOT (up to Day 14)
|
71.9 percentage of participants
|
84.1 percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT Population
TOC (Day 21)
|
61.4 percentage of participants
|
66.4 percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT Population
LFU (Day 28)
|
54.4 percentage of participants
|
62.8 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 4, EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Population: Measured in the Extended micro-MITT, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which was susceptible to either the investigational medicinal product or comparator.
Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=78 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=153 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITT
Day 4
|
56.4 percentage of participants
|
56.2 percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITT
EOT (up to Day 14)
|
73.1 percentage of participants
|
81.0 percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITT
TOC (Day 21)
|
57.7 percentage of participants
|
65.4 percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITT
LFU (Day 28)
|
51.3 percentage of participants
|
60.8 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 4, end of treatment (EOT) (up to Day 14), Test-of-Cure (TOC) (Day 21), and Late Follow-up (LFU) (Day 28)Population: Measured in the CE population, which included all participants from the MITT who received at least 72 hours of IV study treatment, had an appropriate diagnosis of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP)/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), had no important protocol deviations that affected the assessment of clinical outcome, and had no missing nor indeterminate assessment of clinical outcome.
Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=120 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=233 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE Population
Day 4
|
63.3 percentage of participants
|
65.7 percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE Population
EOT (up to Day 14)
|
83.3 percentage of participants
|
85.0 percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE Population
TOC (Day 21)
|
75.0 percentage of participants
|
75.5 percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE Population
LFU (Day 28)
|
68.3 percentage of participants
|
70.8 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 4, end of treatment (EOT) (up to Day 14), Test-of-Cure (TOC) (Day 21), and Late Follow-up (LFU) (Day 28)Population: Measured in the ME population, which included all participants from the micro-MITT who received at least 72 hours of IV study treatment, had an appropriate diagnosis of HABP/VABP, had no important protocol deviations that affected the assessment of microbiological outcome, and had no missing nor indeterminate assessment of microbiological outcome.
Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=51 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=96 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME Population
Day 4
|
60.8 Percentage of participants
|
57.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME Population
EOT (up to Day 14)
|
80.4 Percentage of participants
|
88.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME Population
TOC (Day 21)
|
68.6 Percentage of participants
|
76.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME Population
LFU (Day 28)
|
60.8 Percentage of participants
|
71.9 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 4, end of treatment (EOT) (up to Day 14), Test-of-Cure (TOC) (Day 21), and Late Follow-up (LFU) (Day 28)Population: Measured in the CR-MITT Population, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which is resistant to any carbapenem.
Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=23 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=53 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT Population
Day 4
|
56.5 Percentage of participants
|
60.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT Population
EOT (up to Day 14)
|
60.9 Percentage of participants
|
79.2 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT Population
TOC (Day 21)
|
43.5 Percentage of participants
|
64.2 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT Population
LFU (Day 28)
|
39.1 Percentage of participants
|
50.9 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Population: Measured in the micro-MITT, which included all participants from the MITT who had a Gram-negative pathogen identified at baseline and the pathogen was susceptible to the investigational medicinal product and comparator.
Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=57 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=113 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Micro-MITT Population
EOT (up to Day 14)
|
70.2 percentage of participants
|
81.4 percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Micro-MITT Population
TOC (Day 21)
|
50.9 percentage of participants
|
57.5 percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Micro-MITT Population
LFU (Day 28)
|
43.9 percentage of participants
|
52.2 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Population: Measured in the Extended micro-MITT, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which was susceptible to either the investigational medicinal product or comparator.
Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=78 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=153 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
EOT (up to Day 14)
|
65.4 Percentage of participants
|
75.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
TOC (Day 21)
|
47.4 Percentage of participants
|
52.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
LFU (Day 28)
|
42.3 Percentage of participants
|
46.4 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Population: Measured in the CR-MITT Population, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which is resistant to any carbapenem.
Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=23 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=53 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the CR-MITT Population
TOC (Day 21)
|
26.1 Percentage of participants
|
28.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the CR-MITT Population
LFU (Day 28)
|
26.1 Percentage of participants
|
17.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the CR-MITT Population
EOT (up to Day 14)
|
34.8 Percentage of participants
|
56.6 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Population: Measured in the ME population, which included all participants from the micro-MITT who received at least 72 hours of IV study treatment, had an appropriate diagnosis of HABP/VABP, had no important protocol deviations that affected the assessment of microbiological outcome, and had no missing nor indeterminate assessment of microbiological outcome.
Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=51 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=96 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the ME Population
EOT (up to Day 14)
|
78.4 Percentage of participants
|
85.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the ME Population
TOC (Day 21)
|
56.9 Percentage of participants
|
65.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the ME Population
LFU (Day 28)
|
49.0 Percentage of participants
|
58.3 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Population: Measured in the micro-MITT, which included all participants from the MITT who had a Gram-negative pathogen identified at baseline and the pathogen was susceptible to the investigational medicinal product and comparator. Overall number of participants analysed=participants evaluable for the endpoint, n=number evaluable at the specified timepoint.
Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=37 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=76 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Enterobacter cloacae complex LFU (Day 28)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
40.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Klebsiella aerogenes EOT (up to Day 14)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
66.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Klebsiella aerogenes TOC (Day 21)
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Klebsiella aerogenes LFU (Day 28)
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Escherichia coli EOT (up to Day 14)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Escherichia coli TOC (Day 21)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
66.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Escherichia coli LFU (Day 28)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
66.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
K.pneumoniae complex EOT (up to Day 14)
|
64.9 Percentage of participants
|
88.2 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
K.pneumoniae complex TOC (Day 21)
|
54.1 Percentage of participants
|
61.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
K.pneumoniae complex LFU (Day 28)
|
45.9 Percentage of participants
|
57.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Pseudomonas aeruginosa EOT (up to Day 14)
|
45.5 Percentage of participants
|
68.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Pseudomonas aeruginosa TOC (Day 21)
|
27.3 Percentage of participants
|
36.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Pseudomonas aeruginosa LFU (Day 28)
|
27.3 Percentage of participants
|
28.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
A.calco/baumannii complex EOT (up to Day 14)
|
72.7 Percentage of participants
|
72.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
A.calco/baumannii complex TOC (Day 21)
|
72.7 Percentage of participants
|
72.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
A.calco/baumannii complex LFU (Day 28)
|
63.6 Percentage of participants
|
72.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Enterobacter cloacae complex EOT (up to Day 14)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
60.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Enterobacter cloacae complex TOC (Day 21)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
40.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Citrobacter koseri EOT (up to Day 14)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Citrobacter koseri TOC (Day 21)
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Citrobacter koseri LFU (Day 28)
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Acinetobacter junii EOT (up to Day 14)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Acinetobacter junii TOC (Day 21)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Acinetobacter junii LFU (Day 28)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Klebsiella oxytoca EOT (up to Day 14)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Klebsiella oxytoca TOC (Day 21)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Klebsiella oxytoca LFU (Day 28)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Citrobacter freundii complex EOT (up to Day 14)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Citrobacter freundii complex TOC (Day 21)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Citrobacter freundii complex LFU (Day 28)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Serratia marcescens EOT (up to Day 14)
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Serratia marcescens TOC (Day 21)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Serratia marcescens LFU (Day 28)
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Population: Measured in the Extended micro-MITT, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which was susceptible to either the investigational medicinal product or comparator. Overall number of participants analysed=participants evaluable for the endpoint, n=number evaluable at the specified timepoint.
Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=43 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=89 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
K.pneumoniae complex EOT (up to Day 14)
|
67.4 Percentage of participants
|
85.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
K.pneumoniae complex TOC (Day 21)
|
58.1 Percentage of participants
|
58.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
K.pneumoniae complex LFU (Day 28)
|
51.2 Percentage of participants
|
53.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
A.calco/baumannii complex EOT (up to Day 14)
|
56.5 Percentage of participants
|
75.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
A.calco/baumannii complex TOC (Day 21)
|
47.8 Percentage of participants
|
57.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
A.calco/baumannii complex LFU (Day 28)
|
43.5 Percentage of participants
|
46.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Pseudomonas aeruginosa EOT (up to Day 14)
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
|
59.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Pseudomonas aeruginosa TOC (Day 21)
|
28.6 Percentage of participants
|
34.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Pseudomonas aeruginosa LFU (Day 28)
|
28.6 Percentage of participants
|
28.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Burkholderia cepacia complex EOT (up to Day 14)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
66.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Burkholderia cepacia complex TOC (Day 21)
|
66.7 Percentage of participants
|
66.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Burkholderia cepacia complex LFU (Day 28)
|
66.7 Percentage of participants
|
66.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Klebsiella aerogenes EOT (Up to Day 14)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
66.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Klebsiella aerogenes TOC (Day 21)
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Klebsiella aerogenes LFU (Day 28)
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Enterobacter cloacae complex EOT (up to Day 14)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
60.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Enterobacter cloacae complex TOC (Day 21)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
40.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Enterobacter cloacae complex LFU (Day 28)
|
66.7 Percentage of participants
|
40.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Escherichia coli EOT (up to Day 14)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Escherichia coli TOC (Day 21)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
75.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Klebsiella oxytoca LFU (Day 28)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Citrobacter freundii complex EOT (up to Day 14)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Citrobacter freundii complex TOC (Day 21)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Citrobacter freundii complex LFU (Day 28)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Klebsiella oxytoca EOT (up to Day 14)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Escherichia coli LFU (Day 28)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Haemophilus influenzae EOT (up to Day 14)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Haemophilus influenzae TOC (Day 21)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Haemophilus influenzae LFU (Day 28)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Citrobacter koseri EOT (up to Day 14)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Citrobacter koseri TOC (Day 21)
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Citrobacter koseri LFU (Day 28)
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Proteus mirabilis EOT (up to Day 14)
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Proteus mirabilis TOC (Day 21)
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Proteus mirabilis LFU (Day 28)
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Acinetobacter junii EOT (up to Day 14)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Acinetobacter junii TOC (Day 21)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Acinetobacter junii LFU (Day 28)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Klebsiella oxytoca TOC (Day 21)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Serratia marcescens EOT (up to Day 14)
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Serratia marcescens TOC (Day 21)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Serratia marcescens LFU (Day 28)
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Morganella morganii EOT (up to Day 14)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Morganella morganii TOC (Day 21)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Morganella morganii LFU (Day 28)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Pseudomonas otitidis EOT (up to Day 14)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Pseudomonas otitidis TOC (Day 21)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Pseudomonas otitidis LFU (Day 28)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Ralstonia pickettii EOT (up to Day 14)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Ralstonia pickettii TOC (Day 21)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Ralstonia pickettii LFU (Day 28)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Sphingomonas species EOT (up to Day 14)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Sphingomonas species TOC (Day 21)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Sphingomonas species LFU (Day 28)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia EOT (up to Day 14)
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia TOC (Day 21)
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia LFU (Day 28)
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Population: Measured in the ME population, which included all participants from the micro-MITT who received at least 72 hours of IV study treatment, had an appropriate diagnosis of HABP/VABP, had no important protocol deviations that affected the assessment of microbiological outcome, and had no missing nor indeterminate assessment of microbiological outcome. Overall number of participants analysed=participants evaluable for the endpoint, n=number evaluable at the specified timepoint.
Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=33 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=64 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Pseudomonas aeruginosa LFU (Day 28)
|
30.0 Percentage of participants
|
31.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
A.calco/baumannii complex EOT (up to Day 14)
|
88.9 Percentage of participants
|
80.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
A.calco/baumannii complex TOC (Day 21)
|
88.9 Percentage of participants
|
80.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
A.calco/baumannii complex LFU (Day 28)
|
77.8 Percentage of participants
|
80.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Klebsiella aerogenes EOT (up to Day 14)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Klebsiella aerogenes TOC (Day 21)
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Klebsiella aerogenes LFU (Day 28)
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Enterobacter cloacae complex EOT (up to Day 14)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Enterobacter cloacae complex TOC (Day 21)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Enterobacter cloacae complex LFU (Day 28)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Escherichia coli EOT (up to Day 14)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Escherichia coli TOC (Day 21)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
66.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Escherichia coli LFU (Day 28)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
66.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Citrobacter koseri EOT (up to Day 14)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Citrobacter koseri TOC (Day 21)
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Citrobacter koseri LFU (Day 28)
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Acinetobacter junii EOT (up to Day 14)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Acinetobacter junii TOC (Day 21)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Acinetobacter junii LFU (Day 28)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Klebsiella oxytoca EOT (up to Day 14)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Klebsiella oxytoca TOC (Day 21)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Klebsiella oxytoca LFU (Day 28)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Citrobacter freundii complex EOT (up to Day 14)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Citrobacter freundii complex TOC (Day 21)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Citrobacter freundii complex LFU (Day 28)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Serratia marcescens EOT (up to Day 14)
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Serratia marcescens TOC (Day 21)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Serratia marcescens LFU (Day 28)
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
K.pneumoniae complex EOT (up to Day 14)
|
72.7 Percentage of participants
|
93.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
K.pneumoniae complex TOC (Day 21)
|
60.6 Percentage of participants
|
70.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
K.pneumoniae complex LFU (Day 28)
|
51.5 Percentage of participants
|
64.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Pseudomonas aeruginosa EOT (up to Day 14)
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
|
68.2 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Pseudomonas aeruginosa TOC (Day 21)
|
30.0 Percentage of participants
|
40.9 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Population: Measured in the CR-MITT Population, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which is resistant to any carbapenem. Overall number of participants analysed=participants evaluable for the endpoint, n=number evaluable at the specified timepoint.
Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=16 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=26 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
A.calco/baumannii complex EOT (up to Day 14)
|
31.3 Percentage of participants
|
61.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
A.calco/baumannii complex TOC (Day 21)
|
18.8 Percentage of participants
|
30.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
A.calco/baumannii complex LFU (Day 28)
|
18.8 Percentage of participants
|
19.2 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Klebsiella pneumoniae complex EOT (up to Day 14)
|
71.4 Percentage of participants
|
63.2 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Klebsiella pneumoniae complex TOC (Day 21)
|
71.4 Percentage of participants
|
31.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Klebsiella pneumoniae complex LFU (Day 28)
|
71.4 Percentage of participants
|
26.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Pseudomonas aeruginosa EOT (up to Day 14)
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
|
53.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Pseudomonas aeruginosa TOC (Day 21)
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
|
30.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Pseudomonas aeruginosa LFU (Day 28)
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
|
15.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Proteus mirabilis EOT (up to Day 14)
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Proteus mirabilis TOC (Day 21)
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Proteus mirabilis LFU (Day 28)
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Escherichia coli EOT (up to Day 14)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Escherichia coli TOC (Day 21)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Escherichia coli LFU (Day 28)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Haemophilus influenzae EOT (up to Day 14)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Haemophilus influenzae TOC (Day 21)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Haemophilus influenzae LFU (Day 28)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Burkholderia cepacia complex EOT (up to Day 14)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Burkholderia cepacia complex TOC (Day 21)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Burkholderia cepacia complex LFU (Day 28)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Citrobacter freundii complex EOT (up to Day 14)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Citrobacter freundii complex TOC (Day 21)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Citrobacter freundii complex LFU (Day 28)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Enterobacter cloacae complex EOT (up to Day 14)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Enterobacter cloacae complex TOC (Day 21)
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Enterobacter cloacae complex LFU (Day 28)
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Pseudomonas otitidis EOT (up to Day 14)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Pseudomonas otitidis TOC (Day 21)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Pseudomonas otitidis LFU (Day 28)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Ralstonia pickettii EOT (up to Day 14)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Ralstonia pickettii TOC (Day 21)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Ralstonia pickettii LFU (Day 28)
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Population: Measured in the micro-MITT, which included all participants from the MITT who had a Gram-negative pathogen identified at baseline and the pathogen was susceptible to the investigational medicinal product and comparator.
Overall success was defined as clinical success and microbiological success at the visits of EOT or TOC, or sustained success for clinical outcome and microbiological success at the visit of LFU. Microbiological success included eradication or presumed eradication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=57 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=113 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Micro-MITT Population
EOT (up to Day 14)
|
64.9 percentage of participants
|
75.2 percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Micro-MITT Population
TOC (Day 21)
|
47.4 percentage of participants
|
50.4 percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Micro-MITT Population
LFU (Day 28)
|
40.4 percentage of participants
|
47.8 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Population: Measured in the Extended micro-MITT, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which was susceptible to either the investigational medicinal product or comparator.
Overall success was defined as clinical success and microbiological success at the visits of EOT or TOC, or sustained success for clinical outcome and microbiological success at the visit of LFU. Microbiological success included eradication or presumed eradication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=78 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=153 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
EOT (up to Day 14)
|
61.5 Percentage of participants
|
68.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
TOC (Day 21)
|
44.9 Percentage of participants
|
45.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
LFU (Day 28)
|
39.7 Percentage of participants
|
42.5 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Population: Measured in the ME population, which included all participants from the micro-MITT who received at least 72 hours of IV study treatment, had an appropriate diagnosis of HABP/VABP, had no important protocol deviations that affected the assessment of microbiological outcome, and had no missing nor indeterminate assessment of microbiological outcome.
Overall success was defined as clinical success and microbiological success at the visits of EOT or TOC, or sustained success for clinical outcome and microbiological success at the visit of LFU. Microbiological success included eradication or presumed eradication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=51 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=96 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the ME Population
EOT (up to Day 14)
|
72.5 Percentage of participants
|
78.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the ME Population
TOC (Day 21)
|
52.9 Percentage of participants
|
57.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the ME Population
LFU (Day 28)
|
45.1 Percentage of participants
|
54.2 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Population: Measured in the CR-MITT Population, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which is resistant to any carbapenem.
Overall success was defined as clinical success and microbiological success at the visits of EOT or TOC, or sustained success for clinical outcome and microbiological success at the visit of LFU. Microbiological success included eradication or presumed eradication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=23 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=53 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the CR-MITT Population
EOT (up to Day 14)
|
34.8 Percentage of participants
|
47.2 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the CR-MITT Population
TOC (Day 21)
|
26.1 Percentage of participants
|
22.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the CR-MITT Population
LFU (Day 28)
|
26.1 Percentage of participants
|
17.0 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 28Population: Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
A TEAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence after first dose associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. An SAE was defined as any adverse event (AE) occurring at any dose that met one or more of the following criteria: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required participant hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect or an important medical event.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=150 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=299 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
TEAE
|
147 Participants
|
286 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
SAE
|
10 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose, 5-25 minutes post-dose, and 2-3 hours post-dose on Day 4, 5, or 6Population: Measured in the pharmacokinetic (PK) population, which included all participants from the safety population during the study with at least 1 reportable concentration of XNW4107, imipenem, or cilastatin. As pre-specified, data for PK was collected and reported only for the study drug treatment group (Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107).
Blood samples were taken for analysis of XNW4107, imipenem, and cilastatin concentrations. The data at each time point was calculated as an average across Days 4, 5 and 6.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=286 Participants
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via IV infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin Concentrations
XNW4107 Day (D)4/D5/D6 Pre-dose
|
—
|
3840 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml)
Standard Deviation 3330
|
|
Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin Concentrations
XNW4107 D4/D5/D6 5-25min post dose
|
—
|
16000 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml)
Standard Deviation 6030
|
|
Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin Concentrations
XNW4107 D4/D5/D6 2-3hour post dose
|
—
|
7320 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml)
Standard Deviation 3890
|
|
Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin Concentrations
Imipenem D4/D5/D6 Pre-dose
|
—
|
1770 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml)
Standard Deviation 2050
|
|
Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin Concentrations
Imipenem D4/D5/D6 5-25min post dose
|
—
|
22900 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml)
Standard Deviation 9310
|
|
Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin Concentrations
Imipenem D4/D5/D6 2-3hour post dose
|
—
|
5970 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml)
Standard Deviation 2980
|
|
Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin Concentrations
Cilastatin D4/D5/D6 Pre-dose
|
—
|
1910 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml)
Standard Deviation 3350
|
|
Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin Concentrations
Cilastatin D4/D5/D6 5-25min post dose
|
—
|
24200 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml)
Standard Deviation 10100
|
|
Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin Concentrations
Cilastatin D4/D5/D6 2-3hour post dose
|
—
|
5610 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml)
Standard Deviation 4720
|
Adverse Events
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=299 participants at risk
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via intravenous (IV) infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=150 participants at risk
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
1.3%
4/299 • Number of events 6 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/299 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.67%
1/150 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.33%
1/299 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral haemorrhage
|
0.67%
2/299 • Number of events 2 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Haemorrhage intracranial
|
0.33%
1/299 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ruptured cerebral aneurysm
|
0.00%
0/299 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.67%
1/150 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thermal burn
|
0.33%
1/299 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.33%
1/299 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
0.00%
0/299 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.67%
1/150 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiogenic shock
|
0.33%
1/299 • Number of events 2 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular fibrillation
|
0.33%
1/299 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric mucosal lesion
|
0.00%
0/299 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.67%
1/150 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Haematological infection
|
0.33%
1/299 • Number of events 2 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia viral
|
0.33%
1/299 • Number of events 2 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Mydriasis
|
0.33%
1/299 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/299 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.67%
1/150 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
1.0%
3/299 • Number of events 3 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypercapnia
|
0.33%
1/299 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Laryngeal oedema
|
0.33%
1/299 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory arrest
|
0.00%
0/299 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.67%
1/150 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Intraventricular haemorrhage
|
0.33%
1/299 • Number of events 3 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Brain oedema
|
0.33%
1/299 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Brain stem syndrome
|
0.33%
1/299 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrospinal fluid leakage
|
0.00%
0/299 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.67%
1/150 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral infarction
|
0.00%
0/299 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.67%
1/150 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
General disorders and administration site conditions
Death
|
2.0%
6/299 • Number of events 6 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
General disorders and administration site conditions
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome
|
0.33%
1/299 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
General disorders and administration site conditions
Sudden cardiac death
|
0.33%
1/299 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Brain herniation
|
0.67%
2/299 • Number of events 2 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
1.3%
2/150 • Number of events 3 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post concussion syndrome
|
0.33%
1/299 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematochezia
|
0.33%
1/299 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Melaena
|
0.33%
1/299 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/299 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
0.67%
1/150 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
n=299 participants at risk
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via intravenous (IV) infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
n=150 participants at risk
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminaemia
|
9.0%
27/299 • Number of events 44 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
8.7%
13/150 • Number of events 20 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypernatraemia
|
5.4%
16/299 • Number of events 26 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
6.7%
10/150 • Number of events 24 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
7.7%
23/299 • Number of events 28 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
12.0%
18/150 • Number of events 20 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
32.4%
97/299 • Number of events 198 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
35.3%
53/150 • Number of events 101 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
36.5%
109/299 • Number of events 185 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
24.0%
36/150 • Number of events 61 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoproteinaemia
|
25.4%
76/299 • Number of events 106 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
14.7%
22/150 • Number of events 37 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcaemia
|
16.7%
50/299 • Number of events 94 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
8.7%
13/150 • Number of events 23 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypochloraemia
|
9.7%
29/299 • Number of events 48 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
9.3%
14/150 • Number of events 19 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
41.1%
123/299 • Number of events 234 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
34.0%
51/150 • Number of events 98 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
16.7%
50/299 • Number of events 67 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
18.7%
28/150 • Number of events 52 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
17.1%
51/299 • Number of events 60 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
17.3%
26/150 • Number of events 27 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
7.4%
22/299 • Number of events 25 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
6.0%
9/150 • Number of events 10 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
20.1%
60/299 • Number of events 110 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
26.7%
40/150 • Number of events 74 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
18.7%
56/299 • Number of events 106 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
24.7%
37/150 • Number of events 93 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
10.0%
30/299 • Number of events 46 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
9.3%
14/150 • Number of events 25 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
|
5.0%
15/299 • Number of events 20 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
6.7%
10/150 • Number of events 15 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Venous thrombosis limb
|
10.0%
30/299 • Number of events 35 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
8.0%
12/150 • Number of events 17 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
16.7%
50/299 • Number of events 58 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
15.3%
23/150 • Number of events 29 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hiccups
|
7.4%
22/299 • Number of events 30 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
3.3%
5/150 • Number of events 9 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
5.4%
16/299 • Number of events 16 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
5.3%
8/150 • Number of events 9 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperlipidaemia
|
5.7%
17/299 • Number of events 27 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
5.3%
8/150 • Number of events 10 • Day 1 to Day 28
Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place