Factors Affecting Androgen Deprivation Therapy Choice in Prostate Cancer Patients
NCT ID: NCT05202340
Last Updated: 2023-06-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-01-07
2023-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Multidisciplinary Care Approach on CV Risk Modification in CaP Patients Receiving ADT
NCT06163924
Effect of ADT in Chinese Male With Prostate Cancer
NCT04341324
The Effect of Androgen Deprivation Therapy on Gut and Urinary Microbiota in Patients With Prostate Cancer
NCT03888742
Homoharringtonine Plus Androgen Deprivation Therapy in the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Single-Arm Clinical Study
NCT07163910
Study of Treatment Choice in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer
NCT01177865
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Androgen deprivation treatment (ADT) has become the standard treatment for metastatic prostate cancer in the past decades. Androgen deprivation can be achieved by three main modalities, namely bilateral orchidectomy, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and GnRH antagonist. Apart from injectable ADT, oral GnRH antagonist has been approved recently. ADT can be different in terms of mechanism of action, route of drug administration (injection vs oral), site of injection and frequency of drug administration. Each different formulation may contribute to patient's choice on their drug usage \[1-3\]. However, information regarding the preference of choice and factors affecting the choice of ADT formulation were not available in the literature. Therefore, in this study, possible factors that will affect patient's choice of ADT, reason and preference on their ADT choice will be investigated.
The objective of this study is to investigate possible factors that will affect patient's choice of ADT therapy. This is a cross-sectional study performed in Prince of Wales Hospital in Hong Kong. One hundred patients will be recruited for this study.
After obtaining informed consent, trained research staffs will assist the subjects to perform this cross-sectional survey. Information related to patients' background (including, but not limited to: age, educational level, work-status, living situation), disease background (stage of disease), concomitant drug usage \& administrative frequency, preference on drug usage (ADT vs injection; frequency of drug administration), history of ADT usage, reason and preference on their ADT choice, will be collected from the survey.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Prostate Cancer
Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer
No intervention
No intervention
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
No intervention
No intervention
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who are currently receiving at least one dose of LHRH agonist or antagonist, as androgen deprivation therapy
* Patients who are willing to consent and participate in this study
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who, in the opinion of investigators, are not able to comprehend about the study questions
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chinese University of Hong Kong
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Chi Fai NG
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Chi Fai NG, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Prince of Wales Hospital
Shatin, , Hong Kong
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Psarou A, Cooper H, Wilding JPH. Patients' Perspectives of Oral and Injectable Type 2 Diabetes Medicines, Their Body Weight and Medicine-Taking Behavior in the UK: A Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography. Diabetes Ther. 2018 Oct;9(5):1791-1810. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0490-5. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
Blackwood C, Sanga P, Nuamah I, Keenan A, Singh A, Mathews M, Gopal S. Patients' Preference for Long-Acting Injectable versus Oral Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia: Results from the Patient-Reported Medication Preference Questionnaire. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Jul 2;14:1093-1102. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S251812. eCollection 2020.
Kane JM, Leucht S, Carpenter D, Docherty JP; Expert Consensus Panel for Optimizing Pharmacologic Treatment of Psychotic Disorders. The expert consensus guideline series. Optimizing pharmacologic treatment of psychotic disorders. Introduction: methods, commentary, and summary. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64 Suppl 12:5-19.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CRE-2021.492
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.