Trial Outcomes & Findings for Microelectrodes in Epilepsy (NCT NCT05200455)
NCT ID: NCT05200455
Last Updated: 2022-09-07
Results Overview
With the occipito-temporal implantation approach of implantation of microelectrodes, feasibility will measured by the number of place responsive neurons that could be isolated.
COMPLETED
NA
34 participants
Evaluated for each patient during monitoring period of approximately 2 weeks
2022-09-07
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Microelectrodes
Patients who qualify for this study were implanted with standard electrodes that in addition have microelectrodes embedded in the standard macroelectrodes that are standard of care in epilepsy surgery. Microelectrodes have been shown to record single unit potentials and more localized field potentials on EEG recordings. There is no control group as patient serve as their own control. The patient is presented with a cognitive task and signals are recorded during the cognitive task, the signals during the different elements of the cognitive task are compared to each other or compared to a baseline state.
There is no therapeutic intervention tested, the study is aimed to understand cognitive memory processing and translate animal studies to humans that have described successful memory encoding with certain EEG signals (place cells, theta oscillations)
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
34
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
30
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Microelectrodes
Patients who qualify for this study were implanted with standard electrodes that in addition have microelectrodes embedded in the standard macroelectrodes that are standard of care in epilepsy surgery. Microelectrodes have been shown to record single unit potentials and more localized field potentials on EEG recordings. There is no control group as patient serve as their own control. The patient is presented with a cognitive task and signals are recorded during the cognitive task, the signals during the different elements of the cognitive task are compared to each other or compared to a baseline state.
There is no therapeutic intervention tested, the study is aimed to understand cognitive memory processing and translate animal studies to humans that have described successful memory encoding with certain EEG signals (place cells, theta oscillations)
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
These patients were not implanted with intracranial electrodes for clinical reasons .
|
4
|
Baseline Characteristics
Microelectrodes in Epilepsy
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Microelectrodes
n=34 Participants
Patients who qualify for this study will be implanted with standard electrodes as well as microelectrodes for their intracranial seizure monitoring.
Microelectrodes: Microelectrode implantation
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Evaluated for each patient during monitoring period of approximately 2 weeksPopulation: Participants included patients undergoing intra-cranial EEG monitoring for TLE and are implanted with depth electrodes and microelectrodes via the trans-occipital approach. The total number of place responsive neurons recorded from all participants is reported below.
With the occipito-temporal implantation approach of implantation of microelectrodes, feasibility will measured by the number of place responsive neurons that could be isolated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Microelectrodes
n=30 Participants
Patients who qualify for this study will be implanted with standard electrodes as well as microelectrodes for their intracranial seizure monitoring.
Microelectrodes: Microelectrode implantation
|
|---|---|
|
Feasibility of Microelectrode Technology to Isolate Place Responsive Neurons in the Human Hippocampus as Measured by the Number of Place Responsive Neurons.
|
79 place responsive neurons
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Evaluated for each patient during monitoring period of approximately 2 weeksPopulation: Participants included patients undergoing intra-cranial EEG monitoring for TLE and are implanted with depth electrodes and microelectrodes.
Secondary objective is to investigate whether it is possible to predict the speed of which each participant is performing and navigating during the cognitive task via the intracranial spectral EEG changes (alpha, beta, delta, theta, gamma, and high-gamma) during these tasks. Accuracy of frequency band (brain waves) predicting speed during specific cognitive tasks is measured by how precisely the frequency band predicts navigational speed and is expressed as a percentage of correct prediction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Microelectrodes
n=30 Participants
Patients who qualify for this study will be implanted with standard electrodes as well as microelectrodes for their intracranial seizure monitoring.
Microelectrodes: Microelectrode implantation
|
|---|---|
|
How Precise the Frequencies (Alpha, Beta, Delta, Theta, Gamma, and High-gamma) of Neural Brain Activity Predict the Speed of the Participant at Performing the Cognitive Task (Accuracy Measured in Percentage).
Delta
|
0.477 percentage of accuracy in decimals
Interval 0.4 to 0.492
|
|
How Precise the Frequencies (Alpha, Beta, Delta, Theta, Gamma, and High-gamma) of Neural Brain Activity Predict the Speed of the Participant at Performing the Cognitive Task (Accuracy Measured in Percentage).
Theta
|
0.490 percentage of accuracy in decimals
Interval 0.449 to 0.499
|
|
How Precise the Frequencies (Alpha, Beta, Delta, Theta, Gamma, and High-gamma) of Neural Brain Activity Predict the Speed of the Participant at Performing the Cognitive Task (Accuracy Measured in Percentage).
High-gamma
|
0.382 percentage of accuracy in decimals
Interval 0.305 to 0.405
|
|
How Precise the Frequencies (Alpha, Beta, Delta, Theta, Gamma, and High-gamma) of Neural Brain Activity Predict the Speed of the Participant at Performing the Cognitive Task (Accuracy Measured in Percentage).
Alpha
|
0.440 percentage of accuracy in decimals
Interval 0.372 to 0.477
|
|
How Precise the Frequencies (Alpha, Beta, Delta, Theta, Gamma, and High-gamma) of Neural Brain Activity Predict the Speed of the Participant at Performing the Cognitive Task (Accuracy Measured in Percentage).
Beta
|
0.444 percentage of accuracy in decimals
Interval 0.388 to 0.537
|
|
How Precise the Frequencies (Alpha, Beta, Delta, Theta, Gamma, and High-gamma) of Neural Brain Activity Predict the Speed of the Participant at Performing the Cognitive Task (Accuracy Measured in Percentage).
Gamma
|
0.362 percentage of accuracy in decimals
Interval 0.29 to 0.419
|
Adverse Events
Microelectrodes
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Microelectrodes
n=30 participants at risk
Patients who qualify for this study will be implanted with standard electrodes as well as microelectrodes for their intracranial seizure monitoring.
Microelectrodes: Microelectrode implantation
|
|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Evaluated for each patient during monitoring period of approximately 2 weeks
|
|
Infections and infestations
Chronic Inflammatory Reaction
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Evaluated for each patient during monitoring period of approximately 2 weeks
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place