Comparison of Biocompatibility of Plasmapheresis Procedures With Citrate and Heparin Anticoagulation

NCT ID: NCT05191290

Last Updated: 2023-11-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

15 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-21

Study Completion Date

2022-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Membrane plasmapheresis is one of the methods for treating immune diseases. Plasmapheresis removes autoantibodies and immune complexes, paraproteins, lipoproteins and reduces the concentration of cytokines. In membrane plasmapheresis, plasma is separated from blood cells by a highly permeable membrane. The filtered plasma is then discarded and replaced with replacement fluid. During the procedure, there is an activation of the coagulation system, because of the extracorporeal blood circulation. The anticoagulation during the procedure is therefore necessary.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Standard heparin or citrate is routinely used as a method of anticoagulation in plasmapheresis. Citrate provides effective anticoagulation that is completely limited to extracorporeal circulation. Patients who are at increased risk for bleeding, anticoagulation with citrate is a more appropriate method than standard heparin, while in other patients both methods are equivalent.

Citrate anticoagulation is performed by infusing citrate into the arterial line of the extracorporeal system. Citrate binds to plasma calcium and thus inhibits coagulation in the system. Calcium is added to the venous line of the system (when blood returns to the patient) to maintain a normal plasma ionized calcium concentration. Lowering the ionized calcium in the blood in the extracorporeal circulation inhibits the coagulation and activation of other systems (platelets, leukocytes, complement), which affects the biocompatibility of the artificial material and the whole procedure. Biocompatibility is extremely important, since the contact of blood with artificial material activates both the humoral and cellular systems. As part of the humoral immune system, complement is activated by the production of C3, C4 and C5, factor XIIa, there is also an increase in the production of bradykinin, kallikrein, quinine and plasmin, and some proteins are denatured (gamma globulins, fibrinogen, albumins). When the cellular immune system is activated, lymphocytosis can occur and the is also change in function of phagocytes.

All previous studies show that regional anticoagulation with citrate improves biocompatibility in hemodialysis procedures (compared to heparin anticoagulation), but no direct comparison in plasmapheresis has been observed in the literature so far.

Therefore, the investigators want to conduct a prospective randomized study comparing several parameters of heparin and citrate anticoagulation biocompatibility during plasmapheresis. The aim of the study is to demonstrate better biocompatibility in citrate anticoagulation compared to heparin.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Apheresis Anticoagulation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

heparin anticoagulation

standard heparin anticoagulation during plasmapheresis

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

unfractionated heparin

Intervention Type DRUG

standard heparin at 2500 IU i.v. bolus and then 2000 IU/h continuously i.v. for anticoagulation during plasmapheresis

citrate anticoagulation

sodium citrate anticoagulation during plasmapheresis

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sodium Citrate

Intervention Type DRUG

8% sodium citrate at approx. 27 mmol/h i.v. for anticoagulation during plasmapheresis

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

unfractionated heparin

standard heparin at 2500 IU i.v. bolus and then 2000 IU/h continuously i.v. for anticoagulation during plasmapheresis

Intervention Type DRUG

Sodium Citrate

8% sodium citrate at approx. 27 mmol/h i.v. for anticoagulation during plasmapheresis

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* older than 18 years
* an indication for plasma exchange (plasmapheresis) with albumin solution as a replacement solution

Exclusion Criteria

* contraindication for systemic heparinisation
* acute bleeding
* known active malignancy
* severe infection
* anticoagulant therapy at therapeutic dose
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Medical Centre Ljubljana

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jakob Gubensek

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Medical Center Ljubljana

Ljubljana, , Slovenia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Slovenia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0120-310/2017/3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id