Comparison of Biocompatibility of Plasmapheresis Procedures With Citrate and Heparin Anticoagulation
NCT ID: NCT05191290
Last Updated: 2023-11-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
15 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-01-21
2022-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Citrate anticoagulation is performed by infusing citrate into the arterial line of the extracorporeal system. Citrate binds to plasma calcium and thus inhibits coagulation in the system. Calcium is added to the venous line of the system (when blood returns to the patient) to maintain a normal plasma ionized calcium concentration. Lowering the ionized calcium in the blood in the extracorporeal circulation inhibits the coagulation and activation of other systems (platelets, leukocytes, complement), which affects the biocompatibility of the artificial material and the whole procedure. Biocompatibility is extremely important, since the contact of blood with artificial material activates both the humoral and cellular systems. As part of the humoral immune system, complement is activated by the production of C3, C4 and C5, factor XIIa, there is also an increase in the production of bradykinin, kallikrein, quinine and plasmin, and some proteins are denatured (gamma globulins, fibrinogen, albumins). When the cellular immune system is activated, lymphocytosis can occur and the is also change in function of phagocytes.
All previous studies show that regional anticoagulation with citrate improves biocompatibility in hemodialysis procedures (compared to heparin anticoagulation), but no direct comparison in plasmapheresis has been observed in the literature so far.
Therefore, the investigators want to conduct a prospective randomized study comparing several parameters of heparin and citrate anticoagulation biocompatibility during plasmapheresis. The aim of the study is to demonstrate better biocompatibility in citrate anticoagulation compared to heparin.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
heparin anticoagulation
standard heparin anticoagulation during plasmapheresis
unfractionated heparin
standard heparin at 2500 IU i.v. bolus and then 2000 IU/h continuously i.v. for anticoagulation during plasmapheresis
citrate anticoagulation
sodium citrate anticoagulation during plasmapheresis
Sodium Citrate
8% sodium citrate at approx. 27 mmol/h i.v. for anticoagulation during plasmapheresis
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
unfractionated heparin
standard heparin at 2500 IU i.v. bolus and then 2000 IU/h continuously i.v. for anticoagulation during plasmapheresis
Sodium Citrate
8% sodium citrate at approx. 27 mmol/h i.v. for anticoagulation during plasmapheresis
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* an indication for plasma exchange (plasmapheresis) with albumin solution as a replacement solution
Exclusion Criteria
* acute bleeding
* known active malignancy
* severe infection
* anticoagulant therapy at therapeutic dose
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Medical Centre Ljubljana
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jakob Gubensek
Principal investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Medical Center Ljubljana
Ljubljana, , Slovenia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0120-310/2017/3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id