Trial Outcomes & Findings for Bangladesh PRODUCTIVity in Eyecare Trial (NCT NCT05182580)
NCT ID: NCT05182580
Last Updated: 2024-02-06
Results Overview
Number of completed care encounters among clinic patients with diabetes per retina specialist clinic hour. Numerator is the number of care encounters among patients with diabetes (including persons evaluated by autonomous AI on Intervention Days who are determined not to need to see the retina specialist). The denominator is retina specialist clinic time in hours.
COMPLETED
NA
993 participants
105 randomized clinic days
2024-02-06
Participant Flow
The random allocation of each cluster (clinic day) was concealed until clinic staff received an email with this information just before the start of that day's clinic. Medical staff who determined access, specialists and patient participants remained masked to the random assignment of clinic days as control or intervention. Technicians and/or specialists are not considered enrolled. The participant flow details patient participants randomized by clinic day.
Unit of analysis: clinic days
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Intervention Group
Autonomous AI results are used to evaluate if the participant needs to see the retina specialist (positive result) or not (negative result).
Results utilized from autonomous AI diagnostic system for diabetic retinopathy and/or diabetic macular edema: If patients receive a negative result they do not see the retina specialist
|
Control Group
All participants see the retina specialist irrespective of the results of their autonomous AI evaluation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
494 51
|
499 54
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
494 51
|
499 54
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=494 Participants
Autonomous AI results are used to evaluate if the participant needs to see the retina specialist (positive result) or not (negative result).
Results utilized from autonomous AI diagnostic system for diabetic retinopathy and/or diabetic macular edema: If patients receive a negative result they do not see the retina specialist
|
Control Group
n=499 Participants
All participants see the retina specialist irrespective of the results of their autonomous AI evaluation.
|
Total
n=993 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
Age, years
|
50.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.70 • n=494 Participants
|
51.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.0 • n=499 Participants
|
50.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.88 • n=993 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
259 Participants
n=494 Participants
|
265 Participants
n=499 Participants
|
524 Participants
n=993 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
235 Participants
n=494 Participants
|
234 Participants
n=499 Participants
|
469 Participants
n=993 Participants
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Bangladesh
|
494 participants
n=494 Participants
|
499 participants
n=499 Participants
|
993 participants
n=993 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 105 randomized clinic daysPopulation: Completed care encounters among clinic patients with diabetes
Number of completed care encounters among clinic patients with diabetes per retina specialist clinic hour. Numerator is the number of care encounters among patients with diabetes (including persons evaluated by autonomous AI on Intervention Days who are determined not to need to see the retina specialist). The denominator is retina specialist clinic time in hours.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=1189 care encounters pts with diabetes
Autonomous AI results are used to evaluate if the participant needs to see the retina specialist (positive result) or not (negative result).
Results utilized from autonomous AI diagnostic system for diabetic retinopathy and/or diabetic macular edema: If patients receive a negative result they do not see the retina specialist
|
Control Group
n=920 care encounters pts with diabetes
All participants see the retina specialist irrespective of the results of their autonomous AI evaluation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Completed Care Encounters Among Clinic Patients With Diabetes Per Retina Specialist Clinic Hour
|
1.59 care encounters/specialist clinic hour
Interval 1.3 to 1.8
|
1.14 care encounters/specialist clinic hour
Interval 1.02 to 1.25
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 105 randomized clinic daysPopulation: All retina clinic care encounters
Number of completed care encounters among all clinic patients (with and without diabetes) per retina specialist clinic hour. Numerator is the number of completed care encounters (including persons evaluated by autonomous AI on Intervention Days who are determined not to need to see the retina specialist). The denominator is retina specialist clinic working time in hours.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=3014 all retina clinic care encounters
Autonomous AI results are used to evaluate if the participant needs to see the retina specialist (positive result) or not (negative result).
Results utilized from autonomous AI diagnostic system for diabetic retinopathy and/or diabetic macular edema: If patients receive a negative result they do not see the retina specialist
|
Control Group
n=2708 all retina clinic care encounters
All participants see the retina specialist irrespective of the results of their autonomous AI evaluation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Completed Care Encounters Among All Clinic Patients (With and Without Diabetes) Per Retina Specialist Clinic Hour
|
4.05 care encounters/specialist clinic hour
Interval 3.66 to 4.43
|
3.36 care encounters/specialist clinic hour
Interval 3.08 to 3.63
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 105 randomized clinic daysPopulation: This is the same calculation as Outcome 1 but with the addition of adjustment for complexity. (# retina care encounters\*complexity score) / specialist clinic hours
Specialist productivity (care encounters / specialist clinic hour) adjusted for patient complexity for patients with diabetes. The complexity score for each patient participant was calculated by a masked United Kingdom National Health Service grader using the International Grading system, adapted from Wilkinson et al. International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema Severity Scales (no DED = 0 points, mild non-proliferative DED = 0 points, moderate or severe non-proliferative DED = 1 point, proliferative DED = 3 points and diabetic macular edema = 2 points.) The patient participant complexity score was summed across both eyes. The average complexity score for each arm was calculated. Complexity adjusted specialist productivity was calculated for intervention and control arms by multiplying the respective overall productivity (care encounters per specialist clinic hour) calculation by the respective average complexity score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=1189 care encounters pts with diabetes
Autonomous AI results are used to evaluate if the participant needs to see the retina specialist (positive result) or not (negative result).
Results utilized from autonomous AI diagnostic system for diabetic retinopathy and/or diabetic macular edema: If patients receive a negative result they do not see the retina specialist
|
Control Group
n=920 care encounters pts with diabetes
All participants see the retina specialist irrespective of the results of their autonomous AI evaluation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Specialist Productivity Adjusted for Patient Complexity for Patients With Diabetes
|
3.15 (exams/clinic hour)*(score on a scale)
|
1.19 (exams/clinic hour)*(score on a scale)
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 105 randomized clinic daysAfter the patient participant completed the autonomous AI process, a survey with a 4-point Likert scale ("very satisfied," "satisfied," "dissatisfied," "very dissatisfied") was administered, concerning the participant's satisfaction with interactions with the healthcare team, time to receive examination results, and receiving their diagnosis from the autonomous AI system.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=494 Participants
Autonomous AI results are used to evaluate if the participant needs to see the retina specialist (positive result) or not (negative result).
Results utilized from autonomous AI diagnostic system for diabetic retinopathy and/or diabetic macular edema: If patients receive a negative result they do not see the retina specialist
|
Control Group
n=499 Participants
All participants see the retina specialist irrespective of the results of their autonomous AI evaluation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Were Very Satisfied or Satisfied With Autonomous AI
|
493 Participants
|
499 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Intervention Group
Control Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Nathan Congdon, Director of Research
Orbis International
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place