Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
300 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-02-07
2025-01-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To demonstrate that personalised therapy can be delivered to patients with IBD, by treating patients with an increased risk of poor disease course, defined by a serum protein signature at diagnosis, with a top-down treatment, and that this treatment strategy improves clinical outcomes.
Objectives:
Primary objective: To assess if a top-down treatment can improve treatment outcomes in IBD patients with a high risk of poor disease course, defined by a serum protein signature at diagnosis.
Secondary objective: To assess if a top-down treatment can improve quality of life and health resource allocation in IBD patients with a high risk of poor disease course, defined by a serum protein signature at diagnosis.
Study design:
A multi-centre, biomarker-stratified open-label controlled trial, where newly diagnosed IBD patients are randomised (1:1) to a group with access to the protein signature or a group without access to the protein signature. Study subjects within the protein signature arm who display a high-risk protein profile, will be treated according to a top-down treatment algorithm (anti-TNF agent with/without an immunomodulatory) and subjects without access to the protein signature will be treated according to current clinical practice.
Study population:
Newly diagnosed IBD patients.
Number of subjects: 300
Primary variables:
Composite of both corticosteroid-free clinical remission and endoscopic remission at Week 52, defined as below. Surgery because of IBD during follow-up will be defined as treatment failure.
Ulcerative colitis;
* Clinical remission per patient reported Mayo: A stool frequency subscore (SFS) ≤ 1, and not greater than baseline, and a rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) of 0.
* Endoscopic remission: An endoscopic Mayo subscore of 0 (OR in patients without endoscopy at week 52, normalization of f-Calprotectin, defined as \< 250μg/g
Crohn's disease;
* Clinical remission: An average daily Stool Frequency (SF) ≤ 2.8 and not worse than Baseline AND average daily Abdominal Pain (AP) score ≤ 1 and not worse than Baseline.
* Endoscopic remission: SES-CD≤2 (OR in patients without endoscopy at week 52, normalization of f-Calprotectin, defined as \< 250μg/g.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
NORDTREAT Prospective Study on Inflammatory Bowel Disease
NCT05414578
Stavanger University Hospital Inflammatory Bowel Disease Trial
NCT01551563
Use of Combined Measurements of Serum Infliximab and Anti-infliximab Antibodies in the Treatment of Patients With Crohns Disease Failing Infliximab Therapy
NCT00851565
Anti-TNF-alpha Trough Level Measurements in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
NCT02073526
Study of Treat to Target Versus Routine Care Maintenance Strategies in Crohn's Disease Patients Treated With Ustekinumab
NCT03107793
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Access to protein profile
Top down treatment if patient at high risk
Patients with an increased risk of poor disease course (as defined by a serum protein signature at diagnosis), will be treated with a top down treatment strategy.
No access to protein profile
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Top down treatment if patient at high risk
Patients with an increased risk of poor disease course (as defined by a serum protein signature at diagnosis), will be treated with a top down treatment strategy.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Naïve to immunomodulators, biologics and small molecules, i.e. JAK-inhibitors
* Aged 18-70 years old.
* Is considered eligible according to tuberculosis (TB) screening criteria.
* Written informed consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Unable to provide informed consent
* Unable to comply with protocol requirements (e.g. for reasons including alcohol and/or recreational drug abuse)
* Ongoing sepsis
* Acute obstructive symptoms AND evidence of a fixed stricture on radiology or colonoscopy, which suggest that the patient is in need of surgery over the following year. N.B. patients with modest degrees of stricturing on imaging but no obstructive symptoms may be included according to clinician judgement
* Contra-indications to trial medications including a history of hepatitis B or C, tuberculosis, Cardiac failure, NYHA III-IV or hypersensitivity. Hypersenstitivity to a thiopurine agent should alert the prescriber to probable hypersensitivity to other thiopurines.
* History of malignancy
* Pregnancy at baseline
* Other serious medical or psychiatric illness
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Region Örebro County
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Sønderjylland
Aabenraa, , Denmark
Odense University Hospital
Odense, , Denmark
OUH Svendborg Hospital
Svendborg, , Denmark
Landspitali
Reykjavik, , Iceland
Vestre Viken HF
Drammen, , Norway
Østfold Kalnes
Grålum, , Norway
Oslo Universitetssykehus
Oslo, , Norway
Sykehuset i Telemark
Skien, , Norway
Sykehuset i Vestfold
Tønsberg, , Norway
Höglandssjukhuset Eksjö
Eksjö, Region Jönköpings Län, Sweden
Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset
Stockholm, Region Stockholm, Sweden
Akademiska Sjukhuet Uppsala
Uppsala, Region Uppsala, Sweden
Universitetssjukhuset i Linköping
Linköping, Region Östergötland, Sweden
Ersta sjukhus
Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden
Universitetssjukhuset Örebro
Örebro, Örebro County, Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rejler M, Fuchtbauer JD, Daviethsdottir LG, Fejrskov A, Soderholm JD, Christensen R, Andersen V, Repsilber D, Kjeldsen J, Hoivik M, Halfvarson J. Nordic inflammatory bowel disease treatment strategy trial: protocol for the NORDTREAT randomised controlled biomarker-strategy trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 31;14(7):e083163. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083163.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NT-2020
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.