Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-02-11
2022-12-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Pilot Cohort Study of Surgical and Non-surgical Management of Rotator Cuff Tears
NCT03021733
Electromyography Evaluation of Subscapularis Function After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
NCT00779974
Anterior Shoulder Instability Treated with a Semitendinosus Subscapular Sling Procedure
NCT03424421
Open Versus Arthroscopic Stabilization of Shoulder Instability With Subcritical Bone Loss: The OASIS Trial
NCT04809064
Evaluation of Structural and Functional Integrity of the Rotator Cuff After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
NCT03921944
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Each subscapularis takedown technique requires repair at the conclusion of the procedure when performing shoulder arthroplasty. Repair is crucial for proper force coupling of the shoulder to keep the humeral head implant centered on the glenoid component. Takedown is still performed in a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty but repair is not required to maintain stability. Each takedown technique is reliant on a tendon to tendon interface for healing. Failure of the subscapularis tendon repair can result in pain, instability, decreased functional outcomes and ultimately the need for revision surgery. Subscapularis tendon failure can sometimes be asymptomatic, however it can also be symptomatic and present with the aforementioned signs. Subscapularis failure rates may approach 50% in long term studies although symptomatic cases likely occur in less than 1% of total shoulder arthroplasties . Due to the devastating impact on patients with symptomatic subscapularis failure, there is interest in investigating which subscapularis takedown technique produces the best outcomes. Prior randomized controlled trials as well as systematic reviews have previously been conducted looking at these different takedown techniques, but demonstrated no statistically significant difference in primary endpoints of subscapularis strength at various time endpoint and no statistically significant difference in patient reported outcomes. These prior studies did not evaluate subscapularis perfusion post repair, adequate perfusion is necessary for healing to occur with any subscapularis takedown technique.
The takedown method of the subscapularis has previously been shown to have no statistically significant differences with regards to strength, or patient reported outcomes, however if there was a difference noted in tendon perfusion post repair this may provide rationale to choose one technique over another as improved perfusion may correlate to lower risk of repair failure.
The data acquired using the SPY Elite or SPY PHI or EleVision will be deanonymized and exported to a secure PC for additional analysis and processing. The analysis techniques will be more sophisticated than the current commercial system, and involve a correction for the patient-specific arterial input function (AIF) -the cardiac and circulatory variations that can modify the time and manner in which the ICG dye arrives in the imaging field-of-view.
Indocyanine green (ICG) is a well-studied water soluble, light absorbing tracer that has been used in other capacities to help quantify tissue perfusion during surgery. ICG is able to be injected into a patient intravenously and subsequently circulate systemically while bound to albumin, quickly undergoing hepatic metabolism in just several minutes. The concentration of ICG in specific tissue is able to be quantified as a surrogate for tissue perfusion. ICG due to its IV administration and quick metabolism is able to help quantify perfusion in real time, such as intra-operatively. Systemic reviews as well as case studies, most commonly in plastic surgery, have been performed showing its utility to determine adequate or inadequate perfusion in downstream tissue in situations where microanastomoses are performed, such as with flaps and in hand surgery. Other studies have also been conducted showing the ability to use ICG as a surrogate for tissue perfusion in the achilles paratenon in humans and in rabbits who had undergone rotator cuff repair to determine tissue perfusion after different types of repair. The use of ICG imaging in orthopaedic surgery is relatively nascent, and our institution as well as other collaborators have demonstrated its promise in these applications.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
patients requiring a shoulder arthroplasty
Patients will be administered Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Indocyanine green (ICG) through intravenous injection and imaged by a FDA approved surgical fluorescence imaging device. Both ICG fluorescence and the imaging system have been used for routine clinical practice for many years. ICG fluorescence imaging utilizes intravenously injected ICG, which is a fluorescent dye that is FDA approved for clinical use, illuminated with near-infrared light. The ICG dye is indirectly activated and the dynamic fluorescence due to meniscal perfusion can be captured by an FDA approved imaging system.
Perfusion with Indocyanine green
Infusion of Indocyanine green to determine perfusion of the subscapularis tendon change after tenotomy vs peel technique and subsequent intra-operative repair.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Perfusion with Indocyanine green
Infusion of Indocyanine green to determine perfusion of the subscapularis tendon change after tenotomy vs peel technique and subsequent intra-operative repair.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* \- Meet clinical and radiographic parameters necessary to undergo shoulder arthroplasty
* \- Subscapularis tendon intact clinically on exam or via advanced imaging
* \- Subject has the ability to have their shoulder arthroplasty completed using either the tenotomy or peel technique.
Exclusion Criteria
* \- Iodine allergy
* \- Subscapularis tendon tear or concern for tear
* \- Incarceration
* \- Pregnant women
* \- Patients less than 18 years of age
* \- Prior deltopectoral approach to the ipsilateral shoulder
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
John-Erik Bell
Orthopaedics staff physician
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John-Erik Bell, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY02001327
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.