Physical Performance Testing and Frailty in Prediction of Early Postoperative Course After Cardiac Surgery

NCT ID: NCT05166863

Last Updated: 2024-05-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-04-29

Study Completion Date

2024-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Standard risk prediction models in cardiac surgery (such as EuroSCORE II or STS score) are designed to analyze solely the risk of short-term postoperative mortality. The postoperative morbidity, the ability to rehabilitate or the mid-term survival are not addressed by these means. Recently there have been some reports that addition of physical performance testing to the standard prediction models may provide prognostic value. There is a wide scale of various physical performance and frailty tests that could be used for this purpose, but they have not been confronted with each other yet. Moreover, the postoperative physical rehabilitation has not been objectively assessed in larger scale despite the significant improvement in technology.

The hypothesisis of the study is that the preoperative outcomes of physical performance and frailty testing are able to predict the patient's reconvalescence after cardiac surgery in the short- and mid-term postoperatively. The aim is to analyze a set of tests with regard to their ability to predict postoperative reconvalescence, including the objective activity assessment (using Actigraph wGT3X-BT activity tracking device). Secondarily, the investigators aim to follow the patients up to 1 year postoperatively in terms of evaluating their mid-term outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Detailed description of testing performed in the exact order as in the patient:

1. Body weight and body composition (weigth of fat, weigth of muscle) measurement using bioimpendance scale Tanita BC 545N.
2. Katz Index of Independence in Activites of Daily Living performed and assessed exactly as described elsewhere.
3. Hand-grip strength test using the Kern MAP 80K1 device. Modified Southhampton protocol will be used for the measurement: Patient is sitting on a chair without side arms, the elbows are in a right angle. The patient is instructed to squeeze the device as much as possible and hold for 3 seconds. He squeezes the device with the right hand, then with the left hand. This is performed two times with each hand in total. The highest measured value is recorded.
4. 5-meter gait test. Patient is instructed to walk the 5-meter line as fast as possible and the time is being measured. This is repeated three times. Average time of the three attempts is recorded.
5. 6-minute walk test. Patient is instructed to walk without interruption for 6 minutes in the corridor of department's standard ward (exactly 36 meters long). He walks there and back repeatedly and the walked distance is calculated with regard to the number of corridors walked.
6. During the last two tests patient is wearing a pulse oxymeter (Berry BM1000C) that is connected with investigator's smartphone (either Android or iOS) through bluetooth. Eventual latent respiratory failure is recorded, defined as a drop in peripheral saturation of 4 % and more, or under 88 %.
7. Pre-defined set of laboratory blood tests: haemoglobin, creatinin, albumin, TSH, free T3, free T4.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiac Surgery Rehabilitation Frailty Physical Performance

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* informed patient consent
* patient scheduled for an elective cardiac surgery. The following procedures are accepted: coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) , single valve replacement (SVR), CABG + SVR, CABG + MAZE procedure, SVR + MAZE procedure
* since June 2021, patients undergoing double-valve surgery have been allowed to be included in the study to promote patients inclusion

Exclusion Criteria

* complex cardiac surgery (except the options listed above)
* ejection fraction of the left ventricle \< 30 % according to the last preoperative echocardiography
* EuroSCORE II value \> 5 %
* urgent or emergent surgery
* patient unable to walk and/or perform the test
* severe dementia (due to unability to cooperate during the testing and follow-up)
* re-do surgery
* minimally invasive surgery (i.e. other than full median sternotomy)
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Charles University, Czech Republic

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Jan Gofus, MD, PhD

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jan Gofus, MD, PhD

Deputy Chief for Science and Research

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ján Gofus, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital Hradec Králové

Jan Vojáček, Professor, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University Hospital Hradec Králové

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital Hradec Králové

Hradec Králové, Královehradecký Kraj, Czechia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Czechia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

de Arenaza DP, Pepper J, Lees B, Rubinstein F, Nugara F, Roughton M, Jasinski M, Bazzino O, Flather M; ASSERT (Aortic Stentless versus Stented valve assessed by Echocardiography Randomised Trial) Investigators. Preoperative 6-minute walk test adds prognostic information to Euroscore in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. Heart. 2010 Jan;96(2):113-7. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2008.161174. Epub 2009 Jun 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19561363 (View on PubMed)

Afilalo J, Eisenberg MJ, Morin JF, Bergman H, Monette J, Noiseux N, Perrault LP, Alexander KP, Langlois Y, Dendukuri N, Chamoun P, Kasparian G, Robichaud S, Gharacholou SM, Boivin JF. Gait speed as an incremental predictor of mortality and major morbidity in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Nov 9;56(20):1668-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.039.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21050978 (View on PubMed)

Gofus J, Vobornik M, Koblizek V, Pojar M, Vojacek J. The outcome of a preoperative one-minute sit-to-stand test is associated with ventilation time after cardiac surgery. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2021 Jun;55(3):187-193. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2020.1866771. Epub 2020 Dec 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33356620 (View on PubMed)

Afilalo J, Lauck S, Kim DH, Lefevre T, Piazza N, Lachapelle K, Martucci G, Lamy A, Labinaz M, Peterson MD, Arora RC, Noiseux N, Rassi A, Palacios IF, Genereux P, Lindman BR, Asgar AW, Kim CA, Trnkus A, Morais JA, Langlois Y, Rudski LG, Morin JF, Popma JJ, Webb JG, Perrault LP. Frailty in Older Adults Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement: The FRAILTY-AVR Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 8;70(6):689-700. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.024. Epub 2017 Jul 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28693934 (View on PubMed)

Abdullahi YS, Salmasi MY, Moscarelli M, Parlanti A, Marotta M, Varone E, Solinas M, Sheriff RM, Casula RP, Athanasiou T. The Use of Frailty Scoring to Predict Early Physical Activity Levels After Cardiac Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Jan;111(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.06.029. Epub 2020 Aug 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32818541 (View on PubMed)

Cook DJ, Thompson JE, Prinsen SK, Dearani JA, Deschamps C. Functional recovery in the elderly after major surgery: assessment of mobility recovery using wireless technology. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Sep;96(3):1057-61. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.05.092.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23992697 (View on PubMed)

Joshi A, Mancini R, Probst S, Abikhzer G, Langlois Y, Morin JF, Rudski LG, Afilalo J. Sarcopenia in cardiac surgery: Dual X-ray absorptiometry study from the McGill frailty registry. Am Heart J. 2021 Sep;239:52-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.04.008. Epub 2021 May 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33957101 (View on PubMed)

Hosler QP, Maltagliati AJ, Shi SM, Afilalo J, Popma JJ, Khabbaz KR, Laham RJ, Guibone K, Kim DH. A Practical Two-Stage Frailty Assessment for Older Adults Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Oct;67(10):2031-2037. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16036. Epub 2019 Jun 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31211413 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.actigraph.nl/en/

Website and detailed information on the ActiGraph Activity Tracking Device

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

202010 P07

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.