Accuracy Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Assisted Liver Tumor Ablation Path Planning
NCT ID: NCT05161624
Last Updated: 2021-12-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
160 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-12-15
2022-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Path planning model
Accuracy evaluation
The design of the diagnostic trial will include 160 cases of liver tumors with indications for microwave ablation after a multidisciplinary consultation with clinicians (Multiple Disciplinary Team, MDT), including primary liver cancer and metastatic liver tumors, and the tumor diameter is less than 3 cm. The test subjects consist of three groups: a. path planning model, b. junior ablation specialists, c. senior ablation specialists. The three groups will perform microwave ablation path planning on 160 selected cases of liver tumors. The attending professor of the clinical medical group of the department is responsible for scoring, evaluating whether the design of the plan is reasonable, and then comparing the scoring results by using statistical methods to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of the path planning model established in this study.
Junior ablation specialists
No interventions assigned to this group
Senior ablation specialists
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Accuracy evaluation
The design of the diagnostic trial will include 160 cases of liver tumors with indications for microwave ablation after a multidisciplinary consultation with clinicians (Multiple Disciplinary Team, MDT), including primary liver cancer and metastatic liver tumors, and the tumor diameter is less than 3 cm. The test subjects consist of three groups: a. path planning model, b. junior ablation specialists, c. senior ablation specialists. The three groups will perform microwave ablation path planning on 160 selected cases of liver tumors. The attending professor of the clinical medical group of the department is responsible for scoring, evaluating whether the design of the plan is reasonable, and then comparing the scoring results by using statistical methods to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of the path planning model established in this study.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. The number of tumors is less than 5;
3. The diameter of the tumor is less than 3 cm;
4. No local treatment of intrahepatic tumors has been done in the past.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Multiple lesions in the liver\> 3cm, which cannot be completely ablated;
3. Patients with lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis outside the liver;
4. Other situations where the researcher believes that it is necessary to withdraw from the study
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sun Yat-sen University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Huang Jinhua
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AIasAb
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id