Physical Activity Drop-out Ratio in Patients Living With Type 2 Diabetes

NCT ID: NCT05159089

Last Updated: 2022-06-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

96 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-05-01

Study Completion Date

2024-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Physical activity (PA) - understood as any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscular that requires energy expenditure, related to leisure time, for transport to get to and from places, or part of a person's work - is a powerful force for good regarding type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, fewer T2DM patients sustain the lifestyle recommendations suggested by health care professionals (HCP): 40% of patients did not follow-up on general medical recommendations regarding lifestyle changes. Using a socio-ecological approach - that aims to deal with the different levels of PA influences - may be a good solution to integrate the behaviour change techniques in health care professionals' consultations to prescribe PA efficiently.

The investigators' protocol has two aims. The primary aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of theory-driven PA intervention based on SEM among people living with T2DM. A secondary aim is to explore the feasibility and perceptions/experiences on the PA adherence process in T2DM patients while using the socio-ecological approach and to understand the HCP's viewpoint in its applicability in the Spanish Healthcare system. The investigators want to know the how, not the what, related to PA prescription.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Physical activity (PA) - understood as any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that require energy expenditure, related to leisure time, for transport to get to and from places, or part of a person's work - is a powerful force for good regarding type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A recent meta-analysis has confirmed a positive dose-response relationship between markers of glucose control and increasing daily PA (a 20% increase in adherence or two sessions/month was associated with a 0.15% - 2 mmol/mol - decrease in HbA1c). Adhering to regular PA - understood as not dropping out the new PA behaviour adopted - is a way to control T2DM and promote people living with T2DM self-management. Still, fewer T2DM patients sustain the lifestyle recommendations suggested by health care professionals (HCP): 40% of patients did not follow up on general medical recommendations regarding lifestyle changes.

Socioeconomic status and health or social inequity, immediate and non-negotiable patients' needs and adherence skills rarely discussed by HCP, urban planning and political decisions about PA, or physical inactive workplaces may be reasons for these poor results in sustaining PA lifestyle recommendations.

Researchers have proposed aerobic or resistance exercise - understood as PA planned, structured, and realized during the leisure-time - like Nordic walking, high-intensity training, or lifting weights to increase PA levels throughout exercise among T2DM patients. Despite all options having good results in metabolic and patients' health outcomes, it seems that they are only used in well-controlled studies rather than in healthcare: that may be due to the HCP difficulty and lack of time, support, and knowledge to prescribe this type of aerobic and resistance exercise.

As a result, HCP most common prescription is based on walking, as it is easy to recommend and to do it by people living with T2DM without contraindications. However, only doing that recommendation will be not efficient nor effective to improve PA levels among people living with T2DM. For example, the more prevalent of people living with T2DM belongs to the lower-medium class, which usually live in neighborhoods with poor walkability and parks or green spaces. As a result, patients used to drop out in the long run and despite decades of this type of recommendation, PA population levels are still a problem to be faced. With that panorama, HCP may intentionally withdraw from PA prescriptions to protect patients who find it difficult to keep going.

In this context, ineffective primary-care-based PA prescription risks missing out on the health benefits of the powerful factors that manage people living with T2DM health-related outcomes. Moreover, ineffective primary-care-based PA prescription may enhance socioeconomic barriers and health inequity in these patients. Therefore, given the scale and span of these PA biological and social benefits, it remains a Public Health priority to deploy more effective ways to implement day-to-day PA life. Doing so will be helpful for health patients and for both HCP that used to have not enough time to prescribe exercise effectivity and Public Health expenses in T2DM patients.

Knowing the health need of PA, it is necessary to address PA prescription on how, where, when, and with whom to do it. In this sense, different behaviour changes techniques (BCTs) have been used to face the PA adherence issue and reduce the drop-out ratio: goal setting, action planning, problem solving or social support are a few examples of BCTs used. BCTs results seem hopeful; they improve PA adherence both in the short and in the long run.

However, despite these results, BCTs are still generally not used by HCPs to prescribe PA efferently. HCPs' lack of time and lack of institutional support, and also gathering bad patients' results discourage HCPs to keep trying to change people with T2DM behaviour about PA. Even more, BCTs are still focused on individual responsibility, usually forgetting all the sociocultural barriers as social inequity or poor urban planning. In this context, both HCP and people living with T2DM feel powerless in front of complex multi-component sociocultural situations. BTCs need to take into consideration these complex multicomponent socio-cultural situations to be applied efficiently by HCPs in real-world situations.

In this complex multicomponent sociocultural situation, using a socio-ecological approach - that aims to deal with the different levels of PA influences - may be a good solution to integrate the BCTs in HCPs consultations to prescribe PA efficiently. The socio-ecological model (SEM) considers the complex interplay between individual, relationship, community, and societal factors to influence personal behaviour. This approach focuses on integrating these different levels to change the physical and social environments rather than modifying only individual health behaviours. That may involve facing different sociocultural barriers as socioeconomic status and social inequity (e.g. delivering free PA with a specialist), gender and age discrimination (e.g. explaining to patients what PA is important too), or urban planning (e.g. HCPs should be shown to people living with T2DM some green spaces to do PA). Otherwise, the responsibility to deal with PA adherence will rely on powerless people living with T2DM and HCP alike.

Our protocol has two aims. The primary aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of theory-driven PA intervention based on a SEM among people living with T2DM. A secondary aim is to explore the feasibility and perceptions/experiences on the PA adherence process in T2DM patients while using the socio-ecological approach and to understand the HCP's viewpoint in its applicability in the Spanish Healthcare system. The investigators want to know the how, not the what, related to PA prescription.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Adherence, Patient Physical Inactivity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A mixed methods research model will be used. A prospective and longitudinal three-arm randomized control trial with blinded evaluators will be needed to compare the efficacy of the interventions. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, month three (end of intervention), and at months 12 and 24 (9 and 21-month post-intervention), which will be the main outcome assessment. The study protocol has been developed based on the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendation for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines. On the other hand, a qualitative analysis using semi-structural interviews should help to understand both the reasons for the (un)efficacy and the patients' and HCP's perceptions about the intervention. Qualitative outcomes will be assessed at month three (end of intervention) and at month 24 (21-month post-intervention).
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors
The trial has an open design with a blind assessment of outcomes. Researchers conduction the baseline assessments will be blind to group allocation. The statistician (RMV) will also be blind to group allocation until the completion of the statistical analysis. Participants will be asked not to reveal group allocation when undergoing follow-up measurements. To assess the extent to which blinding has been preserved, researchers will record the number of cases in which allocation was revealed.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Nordic Walking Group

Each group will be received 26 sessions of nordic walking. In each session, the intensity will be controlled and expected to be between 3 to 5 in the Borg scale adaptation. Patients will receive a schedule with all three-month sessions.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Nordic Walking

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Sessions will be progressive: the first month will long 30 minutes, the second month 35 minutes, and the third month 40 minutes (without 10 minutes warm-up and 10 minutes cool-down each session). The track will not have more than 100 accumulate high and will allow doing 5 kilometers without stopping. The meeting point will be between the Biomedical Research Park (Barcelona) and Hospital del Mar (nearby CAP Sant Joan). All sessions will be conducted by an instructor of nordic walking physiotherapists.

Physical activity base on SEM (Socioecological models)

The intervention group based on SEM will apply nordic walking in the same way as the Nordic Walking group. However, in this group, instructors will apply a SEM (instructors will not be the same as in the Nordic Walking group): in each session, the instructors in charge of the Nordic Walking will be also in charge to prescribe the PA.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Socioecological model apply to reduce physical activity drop out in type 2 diabetes patients

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

To implement this model this intervention aims to address three key elements: 1) prepare the user; 2) structure the action; and 3) design the context.

These goals will be worked in each session of Nordic Walking during the warm-up and cool-down and, if necessary, during the session (as long as it's non-stop or slowing down).

Congrol group

Control group outcomes assessment will be the same as the intervention group. However, they will receive common health care professional advice. A common health care professional advice used to recommend patients to walk more and do more PA or physical exercise at the gym. Visits with doctors and nurses will be the same as the intervention group. The difference will be that at intervention group nurses will refer participants to the instructor's physiotherapist to promote PA throughout nordic walking and use the SEM to apply it.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Socioecological model apply to reduce physical activity drop out in type 2 diabetes patients

To implement this model this intervention aims to address three key elements: 1) prepare the user; 2) structure the action; and 3) design the context.

These goals will be worked in each session of Nordic Walking during the warm-up and cool-down and, if necessary, during the session (as long as it's non-stop or slowing down).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Nordic Walking

Sessions will be progressive: the first month will long 30 minutes, the second month 35 minutes, and the third month 40 minutes (without 10 minutes warm-up and 10 minutes cool-down each session). The track will not have more than 100 accumulate high and will allow doing 5 kilometers without stopping. The meeting point will be between the Biomedical Research Park (Barcelona) and Hospital del Mar (nearby CAP Sant Joan). All sessions will be conducted by an instructor of nordic walking physiotherapists.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients with T2D
2. Be eligible to be referred by their doctors for PA intervention;
3. Have no major physical limitations prescribed by the doctor or any HCP
4. Physical inactive according to the General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire - GPPAQ screening tool.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Pregnant patients or have T2D due to gestation
2. Inability to freely consent to take part in the study
3. Inability to understand the study materials or PA intervention
4. T2D patients with complications as neuropathy, retinopathy, and nephropathy
5. Contraindications to do PA
6. Body Mass Index over 34,9
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

89 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Guillem Jabardo-Camprubí

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Sant Bernabé

Berga, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Centre d'Atenció Primaria Anoia

Igualada, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Centre d'Atenció Primaria les Bases

Manresa, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Monistrol de Montserrat CAP

Monistrol de Montserrat, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Centre d'Atenció Primaria Vic Sud

Vic, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Guillem Jabardo-Camprubí

Role: CONTACT

691145828

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Marta Llargues

Role: primary

Marina Marfil

Role: primary

Rafel Donat-Roca

Role: primary

Pilar Flores, Nurse

Role: primary

Marta Solà

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jabardo-Camprubi G, Donat-Roca R, Sitja-Rabert M, Mila-Villarroel R, Bort-Roig J. Drop-out ratio between moderate to high-intensity physical exercise treatment by patients with, or at risk of, type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiol Behav. 2020 Mar 1;215:112786. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112786. Epub 2019 Dec 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31863856 (View on PubMed)

Jabardo-Camprubi G, Bort-Roig J, Donat-Roca R, Mila-Villarroel R, Sitja-Rabert M, McKenna J, Puig-Ribera A. A socio-ecological approach to reduce the physical activity drop-out ratio in primary care-based patients with type 2 diabetes: the SENWI study protocol for a randomized control trial. Trials. 2022 Oct 3;23(1):842. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06742-7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36192800 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Uvicucc

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Evaluation of Effect of Exercise on Prescription
NCT00399997 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3
Exercise Promotion in Primary Care
NCT03429088 COMPLETED NA