The Attachment, Regulation and Competency (ARC) Framework

NCT ID: NCT05155228

Last Updated: 2021-12-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

101 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-01

Study Completion Date

2021-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of the Attachment Regulation and Competency (ARC) treatment framework in comparison to treatment as usual for reducing symptoms of PTSD and Developmental Trauma Disorder among children ages 8 to 16 with a history of exposure to multiple traumatic events.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary goal of this project is to expand the knowledge base in the field of trauma informed interventions by addressing current gaps in the evidence base through: a) evaluation of the efficacy of an innovative intervention designed specifically for children who experience complex trauma and their caregivers, thereby evaluating strategies that are most effective, and b) examining how ARC promotes protective factors (self-regulation, caregiver wellness), thereby supporting the health and well-being of complexly traumatized children and their families. The overall purpose of the randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to examine the effectiveness of ARC on the range of developmental disruptions and clinical symptoms that represent complex trauma, as well as its utility for increasing the adaptive functioning of children and families. In particular it is necessary to determine: 1) if ARC will demonstrate effectiveness in reducing sequelae of complex trauma as determined by a scientifically rigorous randomized control trial study design; 2) the extent to which ARC positively impacts resiliency factors (self-regulation, executive functioning, caregiver wellness), thereby serving to moderate or mediate change in symptoms and functioning; and 3) the impact of ARC across multiple levels of the family ecology, including the child, the caregiver-child relationship (i.e., attachment) and caregiver stress and wellness.

The specific objectives of this research project are the following:

1. Recruit 182 children ages 8 to 16 with complex trauma and their adult caregivers, from clinical samples of children actively seeking treatment for mental health disorders and related difficulties from three community based outpatient clinics in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
2. Conduct comprehensive, clinical interviews with participants and their caregivers to assess sequelae of complex trauma, to determine underlying resiliency factors and to gather information regarding trauma exposure history, over four study time points (pre-, mid-, and post-treatment and 6-month follow up).
3. Deliver 24 sessions of once weekly ARC or TAU over a 6-month intervention period.
4. Evaluate the efficacy of ARC and TAU using a variety of sophisticated statistical methods, such as growth curve modeling, multivariate analyses, and hierarchical linear regression analyses.
5. Disseminate findings to: 1) the academic community via presentations at professional conferences and publications of data in peer reviewed journals; 2) the public, via the Trauma Center website, which received over 600,000 visitors in 2012, with 1,161,451 downloads of our manuscripts and resources for providers, consumers and state service agencies; and 3) the National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN) and Complex Trauma Treatment Network (CTTN) at annual network meetings, via their websites and through ongoing collaborations with partner network sites across the country.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Developmental Trauma Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The Attachment, Regulation and Competency (ARC) Framework is an attachment focused model designed specifically for trauma-impacted children that incorporates principles of the following theoretical orientations: 1) developmental theory; 2) family systems theory; and 3) strengths-based approaches. The central goals of the ARC framework are to (a) support caregiving systems and enhance caregiver-child relationships ("Attachment"), (b) support children in developing the skills and tolerance for connecting to, identifying, and sharing internal experience and managing emotional and physiological states ("Regulation"), (c) build key capacities associated with resilience including the ability to engage in problem-solving and a positive / effective sense of self ("Competency"), and (d) process traumatic experiences.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Attachment Regulation and Competency

Weekly individual psychotherapy for 24 weeks using the Attachment Regulation and Competency intervention.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Attachment Regulation and Competency

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Trauma informed psychotherapy intervention for children with a history of exposure to trauma and their caregivers.

Treatment as usual

Weekly individual psychotherapy for 24 weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Treatment as usual

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Supportive psychotherapy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Attachment Regulation and Competency

Trauma informed psychotherapy intervention for children with a history of exposure to trauma and their caregivers.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Treatment as usual

Supportive psychotherapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. DTD diagnosis as measured by the DTD interview (using standard scoring criteria) or partial PTSD diagnosis as measured by the CAPS.
2. A history of at least two forms of trauma, at least one of which must be interpersonal in nature (sexual, physical or psychological maltreatment, neglect, abandonment or impaired caregiving) as indicated on the Trauma History Profile (THP).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Serious illness that is not stabilized.
2. GAF \< 40.
3. Past diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder, mental retardation, or schizophrenia.
4. Current psychotic disorder or established organic impairment (e.g., TBI).
5. Active suicidal risk, self-mutilation or homicidal behavior toward others within the past 3 months, as judged by the PI.
6. Previous ARC treatment.
7. Any other condition that might interfere with the person's capacity to give informed consent, or to adhere to the study protocol.
Minimum Eligible Age

8 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Justice Resource Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hilary B Hodgdon, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Trauma Center at JRI

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Trauma Center at JRI

Brookline, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

JRI 2016-03

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.