A Prospective Longitudinal Assessment of PD Functional Impairment and Disability Via Mobile Health Technology

NCT ID: NCT05153356

Last Updated: 2023-07-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-06-01

Study Completion Date

2024-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare data from a battery of novel mobile health technologies to standard-of-care validated patient questionnaires and clinician rating scales in Parkinson's disease patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Mobile health technologies include the wearable sensor technologies that are body-worn and passively collect information and mobile devices like smartphones that can be frequently used by patients to actively or passively collect information. However, there has been limited comparison of different wearable technologies to validated clinical rating scales to allow us to come to a consensus about their utility in both clinical practice and research trials. Data from mobile health technologies in Parkinson's Disease (PD) have not been validated to use in the place of clinician rating scales. It is also not clear if the information obtained with the devices consistently correlates with change on the clinician scales and longitudinal motor decline. Technological challenges, such as the feasibility (safety, compliance) of use devices in patients with neurodegenerative disease, change in equipment and algorithms over time, collaboration with companies who may own patents, and other issues may also limit their use in healthcare and research. The purpose of this study is to compare data from a battery of novel mobile health technologies to standard-of-care validated patient questionnaires and clinician rating scales in PD patients. The hypothesis is that there will be an association between data from mobile health technologies and data obtained from validated questionnaires/scales, indicating that these technologies are a reliable means of monitoring motor symptomatology and functional impairment and disability over time. The primary aims of the study are to compare information on continuously-measured patient-reported PD-related functional impairment and disability changes from traditional validated questionnaires to continuously-measured health-related data from a battery of novel mobile health technologies, and to assess the feasibility (compliance, safety, satisfaction) of PD patients to use a battery of novel mobile health technologies.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Parkinson Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Parkinson Disease patients

To examine the relationship between in-home continuous measures of tremor, bradykinesia, mobility, and dyskinesia acquired over a 7-day period, from 2 mobile health technologies (Personal Kinetigraph, Kinesia 360) with one-time in-clinic measures of motor functional ability pertaining to the same 7-day period as assessed by Part 2 of the MDS-UPDRS, Part 4 of the MDS-UPDRS, Neuro-QOL, and PDQ-39. This will be examined in n=20 patients (10 patients assigned to each technology with a crossover at 3 months for a total of 20 patients over 6 months, 6 timepoints with data collected every 2 weeks). Patients will then be following for an observational period of an additional 6 months.

Personal Kinetigraph, Kinesia 360

Intervention Type DEVICE

10 patients will be assigned to each technology with a crossover at 3 months for a total of 20 patients over 6 months, 6 timepoints with data collected every 2 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Personal Kinetigraph, Kinesia 360

10 patients will be assigned to each technology with a crossover at 3 months for a total of 20 patients over 6 months, 6 timepoints with data collected every 2 weeks.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* PD as defined by the UK Brain Bank Criteria
* Disease duration between 2-13 years
* Aged 35-68 years
* Hoehn \& Yahr stage 3 or less when in the levodopa-"ON" state

Exclusion Criteria

* Atypical parkinsonism including 18F-dopa PET patterns consistent with this
* MMSE score of \< 24 or evidence for dementia using DSM-IV criteria
* Unable to do normal copying of interlocking pentagons and semantic fluency score \<20 over 90 secs
* Ongoing major medical or psychiatric disorder including depression and psychosis
* Other concomitant treatment with neuroleptics
* Significant drug induced dyskinesias (\>2 for any body part on the AIMS scale)
* Previous neurosurgery Unable to be imaged using MRI
Minimum Eligible Age

35 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

68 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rush University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Deborah A Hall, MD,PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rush University Medical Center

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20100709

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Measuring Parkinson's Disease Progression
NCT03205956 COMPLETED PHASE1
Gait Disorders in Parkinson's Disease
NCT03416452 WITHDRAWN EARLY_PHASE1
Brain Fitness in Parkinson's Disease
NCT01155349 COMPLETED PHASE3