Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of TAK-771 in Japanese People With Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases (PID) (NCT NCT05150340)
NCT ID: NCT05150340
Last Updated: 2024-11-25
Results Overview
The data was reported at Week 7, 11, 15, 19, 23, 27, and 31 for 4-Week interval and at Week 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25 and 28 for 3-Week interval.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
16 participants
Up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or Up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing Interval
2024-11-25
Participant Flow
Participants with a confirmed diagnosis of primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID) took part in the study at 12 investigative sites in Japan from 24 January 2022 to 28 August 2023.
Participants with PID, who had been receiving a consistent dose of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), conventional subcutaneous immunoglobulin (cSCIG) or TAK-664 (immune globulin subcutaneous \[human\], 20% solution \[20%SCIG\]) for at least 3 months prior to screening were enrolled in the study to receive TAK-771.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Epoch 1: TAK-771 Ramp up Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (rHuPH20). Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution. The dose of 10% IGI was increased from 1/3 of full dose to full dose in 3 weeks for participants who received TAK-771 once every 3 weeks, or from 1/4 of full dose to full dose in 6 weeks for participants who received TAK-771 once every 4 weeks.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included Immune Globulin Infusion (IGI) 10% and Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (rHuPH20). Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Epoch 1
STARTED
|
16
|
0
|
|
Epoch 1
Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set 1
|
16
|
0
|
|
Epoch 1
Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set 2
|
0
|
0
|
|
Epoch 1
COMPLETED
|
16
|
0
|
|
Epoch 1
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Epoch 2
STARTED
|
0
|
16
|
|
Epoch 2
Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set 1
|
0
|
16
|
|
Epoch 2
Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set 2
|
0
|
4
|
|
Epoch 2
COMPLETED
|
0
|
16
|
|
Epoch 2
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of TAK-771 in Japanese People With Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases (PID)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Epoch 1: TAK-771
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution. The dose of 10% IGI was increased from 1/3 of full dose to full dose in 3 weeks for participants who received TAK-771 once every 3 weeks, or from 1/4 of full dose to full dose in 6 weeks for participants who received TAK-771 once every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
25.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.86 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Japan
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Height at Baseline
|
149.26 Centimeters (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.892 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Weight at Baseline
|
44.33 Kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.509 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
19.05 kilograms per meter square (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.747 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or Up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: PK analysis set: all enrolled participants who received investigational drug once, have had at least 1 evaluable serum IgG concentration, and no major protocol deviations or events that would affect serum IgG concentration analysis results. PK set 1: analysis of total serum IgG trough levels for total serum levels of IgG and IgG subclasses. Overall number analyzed: number of participants available for analysis. Number analyzed: participants with data available for analysis at given timepoint.
The data was reported at Week 7, 11, 15, 19, 23, 27, and 31 for 4-Week interval and at Week 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25 and 28 for 3-Week interval.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of Total IgG Antibodies After Administration of TAK-771
Week 7, 4-Week Interval
|
9.372 grams/Liter (g/L)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 10.3
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of Total IgG Antibodies After Administration of TAK-771
Week 11, 4-Week Interval
|
8.741 grams/Liter (g/L)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 13.7
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of Total IgG Antibodies After Administration of TAK-771
Week 15, 4-Week Interval
|
8.929 grams/Liter (g/L)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 13.0
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of Total IgG Antibodies After Administration of TAK-771
Week 19, 4-Week Interval
|
9.150 grams/Liter (g/L)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 15.5
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of Total IgG Antibodies After Administration of TAK-771
Week 23, 4-Week Interval
|
8.944 grams/Liter (g/L)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 20.9
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of Total IgG Antibodies After Administration of TAK-771
Week 27, 4-Week Interval
|
9.006 grams/Liter (g/L)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 18.4
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of Total IgG Antibodies After Administration of TAK-771
Week 31, 4-Week Interval
|
9.159 grams/Liter (g/L)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 20.8
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of Total IgG Antibodies After Administration of TAK-771
Week 4, 3-Week Interval
|
13.51 grams/Liter (g/L)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 29.7
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of Total IgG Antibodies After Administration of TAK-771
Week 7, 3-Week Interval
|
13.15 grams/Liter (g/L)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 35.7
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of Total IgG Antibodies After Administration of TAK-771
Week 10, 3-Week Interval
|
12.54 grams/Liter (g/L)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 43.2
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of Total IgG Antibodies After Administration of TAK-771
Week 16, 3-Week Interval
|
13.50 grams/Liter (g/L)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 39.7
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of Total IgG Antibodies After Administration of TAK-771
Week 19, 3-Week Interval
|
12.76 grams/Liter (g/L)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 46.9
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of Total IgG Antibodies After Administration of TAK-771
Week 22, 3-Week Interval
|
12.79 grams/Liter (g/L)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 40.1
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of Total IgG Antibodies After Administration of TAK-771
Week 25, 3-Week Interval
|
12.95 grams/Liter (g/L)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 57.6
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of Total IgG Antibodies After Administration of TAK-771
Week 28, 3-Week Interval
|
12.70 grams/Liter (g/L)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 43.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-infusion at Week 27 for participants with 4-Week or Week 25 with 3-Week dosing interval and post infusion at multiple time points up to Week 31 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval and up to Week 28 with 3-Week dosing interval.Population: Pharmacokinetic analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once, have had at least 1 evaluable serum IgG concentration, and no major protocol deviations or events that would affect the serum IgG concentration analysis results. Pharmacokinetic analysis set 2 included the analysis of PK parameters for total serum levels of IgG, for baseline-corrected total serum levels of IgG, and for IgG subclasses in Epoch 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=4 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Epoch 2: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses
Total IgG
|
12.72 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23.4
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses
IgG Subclass (IgG 1)
|
7.694 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.7
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses
IgG Subclass (IgG 2)
|
4.140 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23.0
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses
IgG Subclass (IgG 3)
|
0.2396 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 46.7
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses
IgG Subclass (IgG 4)
|
0.3200 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.3
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-infusion at Week 27 for participants with 4-Week or Week 25 with 3-Week dosing interval and post infusion at multiple time points up to Week 31 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval and up to Week 28 with 3-Week dosing interval.Population: Pharmacokinetic analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once, have had at least 1 evaluable serum IgG concentration, and no major protocol deviations or events that would affect the serum IgG concentration analysis results. Pharmacokinetic analysis set 2 included the analysis of PK parameters for total serum levels of IgG, for baseline-corrected total serum levels of IgG, and for IgG subclasses in Epoch 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=4 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Epoch 2: Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
Total IgG
|
6.94 days
Interval 2.94 to 8.85
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 1)
|
3.92 days
Interval 2.94 to 8.83
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 2)
|
3.92 days
Interval 2.94 to 8.83
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 3)
|
2.99 days
Interval 2.8 to 8.83
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 4)
|
3.88 days
Interval 2.8 to 5.04
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-infusion at Week 27 for participants with 4-Week or Week 25 with 3-Week dosing interval and post infusion at multiple time points up to Week 31 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval and up to Week 28 with 3-Week dosing interval.Population: PK analysis set: all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once, have had at least 1 evaluable serum IgG concentration, and no major protocol deviations or events that would affect the serum IgG concentration analysis results. PK analysis set 2: analysis of PK parameters for total serum levels of IgG, for baseline-corrected total serum levels of IgG, and for IgG subclasses in Epoch 2. Number of participants analyzed are number of participants available for analysis.
AUC is expressed as grams\*day per liter/grams per kilograms \[(g\*day/L)/(g/kg)\].
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=4 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Epoch 2: Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
Total IgG, AUCtau/Dose
|
767.9 (g*day/L)/(g/kg)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 40.0
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
Total IgG, AUClast/Dose
|
625.6 (g*day/L)/(g/kg)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 55.2
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 1), AUCtau/Dose
|
432.4 (g*day/L)/(g/kg)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.2
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 1), AUClast/Dose
|
370.7 (g*day/L)/(g/kg)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 53.0
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 2), AUCtau/Dose
|
230.4 (g*day/L)/(g/kg)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 25.2
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 2), AUClast/Dose
|
197.4 (g*day/L)/(g/kg)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 40.5
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 3), AUCtau/Dose
|
7.916 (g*day/L)/(g/kg)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 165.6
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 3), AUClast/Dose
|
5.449 (g*day/L)/(g/kg)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 227.2
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 4), AUCtau/Dose
|
15.65 (g*day/L)/(g/kg)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 37.1
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 4), AUClast/Dose
|
12.08 (g*day/L)/(g/kg)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 53.4
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At multiple time points post-infusion from Week 7 for participants with 4-Week or Week 4 with 3-Week dosing interval up to Week 31 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval and up to Week 28 with 3-Week dosing intervalPopulation: PK analysis set: all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once, have had at least 1 evaluable serum IgG concentration, and no major protocol deviations or events that would affect the serum IgG concentration analysis results. PK analysis set 2: analysis of PK parameters for total serum levels of IgG, for baseline-corrected total serum levels of IgG, and for IgG subclasses in Epoch 2. Number of participants analyzed is number of participant available for analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=4 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Epoch 2: Half-life of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
Total IgG
|
NA day
Data was not calculated due to \<3 contributes based on the analysis plan for this outcome measure.
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Half-life of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 1)
|
59.7 day
Interval 40.4 to 77.9
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Half-life of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 2)
|
49.6 day
Interval 40.8 to 71.4
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Half-life of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 3)
|
NA day
Data was not calculated due to \<3 contributes based on the analysis plan for this outcome measure.
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Half-life of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 4)
|
35.9 day
Interval 35.8 to 46.3
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-infusion at Week 27 for participants with 4-Week or Week 25 with 3-Week dosing interval and post infusion at multiple time points up to Week 31 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval and up to Week 28 with 3-Week dosing interval.Population: PK analysis set: all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once, have had at least 1 evaluable serum IgG concentration, and no major protocol deviations or events that would affect the serum IgG concentration analysis results. PK analysis set 2: the analysis of PK parameters for total serum levels of IgG, for baseline-corrected total serum levels of IgG, and for IgG subclasses in Epoch 2. Number of participants analyzed is number of participants available for analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=4 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Epoch 2: Apparent Total Clearance (CL/F) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
Total IgG
|
76.84 milliliters per day (mL/day)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 29.4
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Apparent Total Clearance (CL/F) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 1)
|
117.0 milliliters per day (mL/day)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 37.9
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Apparent Total Clearance (CL/F) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 2)
|
219.6 milliliters per day (mL/day)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.8
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Apparent Total Clearance (CL/F) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 3)
|
6392 milliliters per day (mL/day)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 176.6
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Apparent Total Clearance (CL/F) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 4)
|
3234 milliliters per day (mL/day)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 58.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-infusion at Week 27 for participants with 4-Week or Week 25 with 3-Week dosing interval and post infusion at multiple time points up to Week 31 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval and up to Week 28 with 3-Week dosing interval.Population: PK analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once, have had at least 1 evaluable serum IgG concentration, and no major protocol deviations or events that would affect the serum IgG concentration analysis results. PK analysis set 2=analysis of PK parameters for total serum levels of IgG, for baseline-corrected total serum levels of IgG, and for IgG subclasses in Epoch 2. Number participants analyzed: number of participants available for analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=4 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Epoch 2: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
Total IgG
|
NA mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Data was not estimable as the concentrations for all participants were below the limit of quantitation.
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 1)
|
8193 mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 54.9
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 2)
|
14650 mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 57.0
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 3)
|
NA mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Data was not estimable as the concentrations for all participants were below the limit of quantitation.
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 4)
|
165900 mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 88.3
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-infusion at Week 27 for participants with 4-Week or Week 25 with 3-Week dosing interval and post infusion at multiple time points up to Week 31 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval and up to Week 28 with 3-Week dosing interval.Population: PK analysis set: all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once, have had at least 1 evaluable serum IgG concentration, and no major protocol deviations or events that would affect serum IgG concentration analysis results. PK analysis set 2: analysis of PK parameters for total serum levels of IgG, for baseline-corrected total serum levels of IgG, and for IgG subclasses in Epoch 2. Number of participants analyzed: number of participants available for analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=4 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Epoch 2: Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
Total IgG
|
9.347 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17.9
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 1)
|
5.479 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 10.7
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 2)
|
2.941 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 19.8
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 3)
|
NA g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Data was not estimable as the concentrations for participant were below the limit of quantitation.
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of Total Serum Levels of IgG and IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4)
IgG Subclass (IgG 4)
|
0.2255 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 8.4
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4-Week dosing interval (Week 7, Week 11, Week 15, Week 19, Week 23, Week 27, and Week 31); 3-Week dosing interval (Week 4, week 7, Week 10, Week 16, Week 19, Week 22, Week 25, and Week 28)Population: PK analysis set: all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once, have had at least 1 evaluable serum IgG concentration, and no major protocol deviations or events that would affect the serum IgG concentration analysis results. PK analysis set 2: analysis of PK parameters for total serum levels of IgG, for baseline-corrected total serum levels of IgG, and for IgG subclasses in Epoch 2. Number analyzed: participants with data available for analysis at given time point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 2, Week 15, 4-Week Interval
|
2.912 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 13.5
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 2, Week 19, 4-Week Interval
|
3.043 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.5
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 2, Week 23, 4-Week Interval
|
2.976 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.7
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 2, Week 27, 4-Week Interval
|
3.078 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 15.5
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 1, Week 25, 3-Week Interval
|
8.573 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 82.9
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 1, Week 28, 3-Week Interval
|
8.845 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 68.3
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 2, Week 4, 3-Week Interval
|
1.936 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 105.6
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 2, Week 7, 3-Week Interval
|
1.859 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 89.7
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 2, Week 10, 3-Week Interval
|
1.852 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 83.0
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 1, Week 7, 4-Week Interval
|
5.478 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 12.1
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 1, Week 11, 4-Week Interval
|
5.106 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 15.6
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 1, Week 15, 4-Week Interval
|
4.987 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 11.9
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 1, Week 19, 4-Week Interval
|
5.063 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 10.1
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 1, Week 23, 4-Week Interval
|
4.873 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 10.8
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 1, Week 27, 4-Week Interval
|
5.066 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.6
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 1, Week 31, 4-Week Interval
|
5.104 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14.0
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 2, Week 7, 4-Week Interval
|
3.147 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 20.1
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 2, Week 11, 4-Week Interval
|
2.931 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 15.0
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 2, Week 31, 4-Week Interval
|
3.091 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 18.3
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 3, Week 7, 4-Week Interval
|
0.1380 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of variation could not be determined for single participant.
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 3, Week 11, 4-Week Interval
|
0.1780 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of variation could not be determined for single participant.
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 3, Week 15, 4-Week Interval
|
0.1390 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of variation could not be determined for single participant.
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 3, Week 27, 4-Week Interval
|
0.2280 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of variation could not be determined for single participant.
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 4, Week 7, 4-Week Interval
|
0.1933 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 15.9
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 4, Week 11, 4-Week Interval
|
0.1965 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22.7
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 4, Week 15, 4-Week Interval
|
0.2020 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.8
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 4, Week 19, 4-Week Interval
|
0.2057 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.1
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 4, Week 23, 4-Week Interval
|
0.2054 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14.6
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 4, Week 27, 4-Week Interval
|
0.2228 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 24.6
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 4, Week 31, 4-Week Interval
|
0.2265 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 25.6
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 1, Week 4, 3-Week Interval
|
9.699 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 55.6
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 1, Week 7, 3-Week Interval
|
8.906 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 67.0
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 1, Week 10, 3-Week Interval
|
8.661 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 66.7
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 1, Week 16, 3-Week Interval
|
8.860 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 68.0
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 1, Week 19, 3-Week Interval
|
8.687 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 68.9
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 1, Week 22, 3-Week Interval
|
8.641 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 64.3
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 2, Week 16, 3-Week Interval
|
1.964 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 82.5
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 2, Week 19, 3-Week Interval
|
1.944 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 82.1
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 2, Week 22, 3-Week Interval
|
1.957 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 89.1
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 2, Week 25, 3-Week Interval
|
1.910 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 73.5
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 2, Week 28, 3-Week Interval
|
1.948 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 88.1
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 4, Week 4, 3-Week Interval
|
0.1680 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of variation could not be determined for single participant.
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 4, Week 7, 3-Week Interval
|
0.1680 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of variation could not be determined for single participant.
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 4, Week 10, 3-Week Interval
|
0.2010 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of variation could not be determined for single participant.
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 4, Week 16, 3-Week Interval
|
0.2280 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of variation could not be determined for single participant.
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 4, Week 19, 3-Week Interval
|
0.2120 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of variation could not be determined for single participant.
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 4, Week 22, 3-Week Interval
|
0.2230 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of variation could not be determined for single participant.
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 4, Week 25, 3-Week Interval
|
0.2060 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of variation could not be determined for single participant.
|
—
|
|
Epoch 2: Serum Trough Levels of IgG Subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) After Administration of TAK-771
IgG 4, Week 28, 3-Week Interval
|
0.2390 g/L
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of variation could not be determined for single participant.
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 1, up to end of trial (EOS: Week 31 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 28 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval)Population: PK Analysis Set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once, have had at least 1 evaluable serum IgG concentration, and no major protocol deviations or events that would affect the serum IgG concentration analysis results. PK Analysis Set included the analysis of total serum IgG trough levels for total serum levels of IgG and IgG subclasses. Number analyzed are number of participants with data available for analysis at given timepoint.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Epoch 1 and 2: Trough Levels of Anti-Clostridium Tetani Toxoid Antibody After Administration of TAK-771
Week 1
|
1.334 IU/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 84.4
|
—
|
|
Epoch 1 and 2: Trough Levels of Anti-Clostridium Tetani Toxoid Antibody After Administration of TAK-771
End of Trial (EOS)
|
1.578 IU/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 68.4
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 1, up to end of trial (EOS: Week 31 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 28 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval)Population: Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once, have had at least 1 evaluable serum IgG concentration, and no major protocol deviations or events that would affect serum IgG concentration analysis results. Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set included analysis of total serum IgG trough levels for total serum levels of IgG and IgG subclasses. Number analyzed are number of participants with data available for analysis at given timepoint.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Epoch 1 and 2: Trough Levels of Anti-HBV Antibody After Administration of TAK-771
Week 1
|
278.38 mIU/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 125.0
|
—
|
|
Epoch 1 and 2: Trough Levels of Anti-HBV Antibody After Administration of TAK-771
End of Trial (EOS)
|
383.37 mIU/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 57.7
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 1, up to end of trial (EOS: Week 31 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 28 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval).Population: PK Analysis Set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once, have had at least 1 evaluable serum IgG concentration, and no major protocol deviations or events that would affect the serum IgG concentration analysis results. PK Analysis Set included analysis of total serum IgG trough levels for total serum levels of IgG and IgG subclasses. Number analyzed are number of participants with data available for analysis at given timepoint.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Epoch 1 and 2: Trough Levels of Anti-HIB Antibody After Administration of TAK-771
Week 1
|
1.958 ug/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 45.7
|
—
|
|
Epoch 1 and 2: Trough Levels of Anti-HIB Antibody After Administration of TAK-771
End of Trial (EOS)
|
1.519 ug/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 46.8
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 1 up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
TEAEs are defined as Adverse events (AEs) with onset after date-time of first dose of Investigational product (IP), or medical conditions present prior to the start of IP but increased in severity or relationship after date-time of first dose of IP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
|
81.3 percentage of participants
|
93.8 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 1 up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
TEAEs are defined as AEs with onset after date-time of first dose of IP, or medical conditions present prior to the start of IP but increased in severity or relationship after date-time of first dose of IP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With TAK-771-Related and TAK-771-Non-Related TEAEs
TEAE Related
|
56.3 percentage of participants
|
68.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With TAK-771-Related and TAK-771-Non-Related TEAEs
TEAE Non-Related
|
62.5 percentage of participants
|
81.3 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 1 up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
TEAEs are defined as AEs with onset after date-time of first dose of IP, or medical conditions present prior to the start of IP but increased in severity or relationship after date-time of first dose of IP. Serious TEAE=any untoward clinical manifestation of signs, symptoms, outcomes (related to IP or not) at any dose: results in death, was life-threatening, requires inpatient/prolongation of hospitalization, resulted in persistent/significant disability/incapacity, congenital abnormality/birth defect, important medical event. AESI=investigator-reported hypersensitivity reactions, events of disordered coagulation as bleeding/hypercoagulable AESI.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Serious and Non-serious TEAEs
Serious TEAEs
|
6.3 percentage of participants
|
6.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Serious and Non-serious TEAEs
Non-serious TEAEs
|
81.3 percentage of participants
|
93.8 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 1 up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Severe TEAEs
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
6.3 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 1 up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Local and Systemic TEAEs
Local TEAEs
|
43.8 percentage of participants
|
43.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Local and Systemic TEAEs
Systemic TEAEs
|
75.0 percentage of participants
|
87.5 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 1 up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Premature Discontinuation From Study
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 1 up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Infusion-associated TEAEs
|
37.5 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 1 up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Recorded as TEAEs
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 1 up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Body Weight Recorded as TEAEs
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4-Week Dosing Interval (Week 7, Week 19, and Week 31); 3-Week Dosing Interval (Week 4, Week 16, and Week 28)Population: Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Epoch 2: Percentage of Participants Who Develop Anti-rHuPH20 Binding Antibody Titers of Greater Than or Equal to 1:160
|
0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4-Week Dosing Interval (Week 7, Week 19, and Week 31); 3-Week Dosing Interval (Week 4, Week 16, and Week 28)Population: Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Epoch 2: Percentage of Participants Who Develop Neutralizing Antibodies to rHuPH20
|
0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 1 up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Safety Analysis Set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
Tolerability events is defined as a case that the infusion rate is reduced, or that the infusion is interrupted or stopped, due to a TEAE related to TAK-771 infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Tolerability Events Related to the Infusion of TAK-771
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 4 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or Up to Week 3 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Safety Analysis Set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once.
The number of weeks to reach final dose interval is defined as treatment duration of Epoch 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Epoch 1: Number of Weeks to Reach Final Dose Interval (3 Weeks or 4 Weeks)
|
6.00 weeks
Interval 3.0 to 6.9
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or Up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Epoch 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a Treatment Interval of 3 or 4 Weeks
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or Up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Epoch 2: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain a Treatment Interval of 3 or 4 Weeks
|
100.0 percenatge of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 1 up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Full Analysis Set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once.
The annual rate of validated ASBIs is calculated as the mean number of ASBIs per participant per year.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Annual Rate of Validated Acute Serious Bacterial Infections (ASBIs) Per Participant Per Year
|
0.00 ASBIs per participant per year
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 1 up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Full Analysis Set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once.
The annual rate of all infections is calculated as the mean number of infections per participant per year.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Annual Rate of All Infections Per Participant Per Year
|
2.69 infections per participant per year
Standard Deviation 3.133
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 1 up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Full Analysis Set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Healthcare Resource Utilization: Days Not Able To Attend School/Work or To Perform Normal Daily Activities Due to Illness/Infection
|
0 number of days
Interval 0.0 to 26.8
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 1 up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Full Analysis Set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Healthcare Resource Utilization: Days on Antibiotics
|
0 number of days
Interval 0.0 to 40.2
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 1 up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Full Analysis Set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Hospitalizations Due to Illness/Infection Per Year
|
0.22 hospitalizations per year
Standard Deviation 0.591
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 1 up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Full Analysis Set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Healthcare Resource Utilization: Length of Stay in Days of Hospitalizations Due to Illness/Infection Per Participant Per Year
|
0 hospitalization days/participant/year
Interval 0.0 to 10.5
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 1 up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Full Analysis Set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Acute (Urgent or Unscheduled) Physician Visits Due to Illness/Infection
|
1.74 Acute Physician Visits
Interval 0.0 to 11.7
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 7 up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or From Week 4 up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Epoch 2 Full Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
Total number of infusion sites injected in Epoch 2 / Total number of infusions administered in Epoch 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infusion Parameters in Epoch 2: Number of Infusion Sites Per Infusion
|
1.77 infusion sites per infusion
Standard Deviation 0.394
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 7 up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or From Week 4 up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Epoch 2 Full Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
Total number of infusion sites injected in Epoch 2 / (duration of Epoch 2 / 30.4375), where duration of Epoch 2 is calculated as the end date of the Epoch 2 - the start date of the Epoch 2 + 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infusion Parameters in Epoch 2: Number of Infusion Sites Per Month
|
2.02 infusion sites per month
Standard Deviation 0.514
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 7 up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or From Week 4 up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Epoch 2 Full Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
End date and time of infusion in Epoch 2 - Start date and time of infusion in Epoch 2, for each infusion per participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infusion Parameters in Epoch 2: Duration of Individual Infusions
|
74.0 minutes
Interval 18.0 to 207.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 7 up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or From Week 4 up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Epoch 2 Full Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
Maximum Infusion Rate results from CRF / number of infusion sites/body.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infusion Parameters in Epoch 2: Maximum Infusion Rate Per Site
|
222.3 mL/hour per site
Standard Deviation 83.77
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 7 up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or From Week 4 up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Epoch 2 Full Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2. Number analyzed are the number of participants with data available for analysis at given timepoint.
Infusion Volume per Site is scheduled Dose results from CRF / number of infusion sites/body.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infusion Parameters in Epoch 2: Infusion Volume Per Site
|
117.3 mL/site
Standard Deviation 77.73
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4-Week Dosing Interval (Week 1 and Week 31); 3-Week Dosing Interval (Week 1 and Week 28)Population: Full Analysis Set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses. Number analyzed is the number of participants available for analysis in the specified category.
The PEDS-QL is a generic Health-Related Quality of Life (HR QoL) instrument designed specifically for a pediatric population. It captures the following domains: general health/activities, feelings/emotional, social functioning, school functioning. In this study, 2-7 years (parent as observer), 8-13 years (participant as observer) for PEDS-QL health questionnaire will be analyzed. Higher scores indicate better quality of life (QOL) for all domains of the PEDS-QL. This modular instrument uses a 5-point scale: from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). Items are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0. Four dimensions (physical, emotional, social, \& school functioning) are scored.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=5 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Life (QOL): Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PEDS-QL)
Baseline (Week 1), 2-7 years, Total score, 4-week interval
|
93.48 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is not estimable for single participant
|
—
|
|
Quality of Life (QOL): Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PEDS-QL)
Baseline (Week 1), 2-7 years, Total score, 3-week interval
|
76.09 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is not estimable for single participant
|
—
|
|
Quality of Life (QOL): Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PEDS-QL)
Baseline (Week 1), 8-13 years, Total score, 4-week interval
|
77.17 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.091
|
—
|
|
Quality of Life (QOL): Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PEDS-QL)
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET),2-7 years, Total score, 4-week interval
|
2.17 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is not estimable for single participant.
|
—
|
|
Quality of Life (QOL): Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PEDS-QL)
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET),2-7 years, Total score, 3-week interval
|
11.96 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is not estimable for single participant.
|
—
|
|
Quality of Life (QOL): Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PEDS-QL)
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), 8-13 years, Total score, 4-week interval
|
11.41 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.843
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4-Week Dosing Interval (Week 1 and Week 31); 3-Week Dosing Interval (Week 1 and Week 28)Population: Epoch 2 Full Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses. Number analyzed is the number of participants available for analysis in the specified category.
The SF-36 is a generic quality-of-life instrument that has been widely used to assess Health-Related Quality of Life (HR QoL) of participants. In this study, 14 years and older (participant as observer) for SF-36 health questionnaire will be analyzed. Generic instruments are used in general populations to assess a wide range of domains applicable to a variety of health states, conditions, and diseases. The SF-36 consists of 36 items that are aggregated into 8 multi-item scales (physical functioning, role - physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role - emotional, and mental health), with scores ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better HR QoL. Physical component summary (PCS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=8 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
QOL: Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36 v2)
Baseline (Week 1), 14 years and older, Physical component summary (PCS) score, 4-week interval
|
51.85 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.458
|
—
|
|
QOL: Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36 v2)
Baseline (Week 1), 14 years and older, Physical component summary (PCS) score, 3-week interval
|
53.30 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.546
|
—
|
|
QOL: Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36 v2)
Baseline (Week 1), 14 years and older, Mental component summary (MCS) score 4-week interval
|
51.38 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.060
|
—
|
|
QOL: Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36 v2)
Baseline (Week 1), 14 years and older, Mental component summary (MCS) score 3-week interval
|
59.90 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.465
|
—
|
|
QOL: Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36 v2)
Baseline (Week 1), >=14 years, Role/social component summary (RCS) score, 4-week interval
|
49.67 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.495
|
—
|
|
QOL: Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36 v2)
Baseline (Week 1), >=14 years, Role/social component summary (RCS) score, 3-week interval
|
53.50 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.768
|
—
|
|
QOL: Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36 v2)
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), >=14 years, Physical component summary (PCS) score, 4-week interval
|
0.20 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.709
|
—
|
|
QOL: Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36 v2)
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), >=14 years, Physical component summary (PCS) score, 3-week interval
|
-1.85 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.202
|
—
|
|
QOL: Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36 v2)
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), >=14 years, Mental component summary (MCS) score 4-week interval
|
-3.12 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.605
|
—
|
|
QOL: Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36 v2)
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), >=14 years, Mental component summary (MCS) score 3-week interval
|
-3.55 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.636
|
—
|
|
QOL: Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36 v2)
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), >=14 years, Role/social component summary (RCS) score 4-week interval
|
-0.80 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.592
|
—
|
|
QOL: Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36 v2)
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), >=14 years, Role/social component summary (RCS) score,3-week interval
|
4.90 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.394
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4-Week dosing interval (Week 1 and Week 31); 3-Week dosing interval (Week 1 and Week 28)Population: Full Analysis Set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses. Number analyzed is the number of participants available for analysis in the specified category.
The EQ-5D-3L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome and was administered to all participants to assess the effect of the treatment on the participants' quality of life. Participants select answer for each of the following 3-level dimensions: 1) mobility; 2) self-care; 3) usual activities; 4) pain/discomfort; 5) anxiety/depression used to compute an index score ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 1 (best imaginable health state). An increase in the EQ-5D-3L index score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=12 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
QOL: EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Health Questionnaire Index Score
Baseline (Week 1), 2-11 years, EQ-5D index score, 4-week interval
|
1.0000 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00000
|
—
|
|
QOL: EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Health Questionnaire Index Score
Baseline (Week 1), 2-11 years, EQ-5D index score, 3-week interval
|
0.6750 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is not estimable for single participant.
|
—
|
|
QOL: EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Health Questionnaire Index Score
Baseline (Week 1), 12 years and older, EQ-5D index score, 4-week interval
|
0.9271 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12655
|
—
|
|
QOL: EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Health Questionnaire Index Score
Baseline (Week 1), 12 years and older, EQ-5D index score, 3-week interval
|
1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
|
QOL: EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Health Questionnaire Index Score
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), 2-11 years, EQ-5D index score, 4-week interval
|
0.0000 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is not estimable for single participant.
|
—
|
|
QOL: EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Health Questionnaire Index Score
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), 2-11 years, EQ-5D index score, 3-week interval
|
0.3250 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is not estimable for single participant.
|
—
|
|
QOL: EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Health Questionnaire Index Score
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), 12 years and older, EQ-5D index score, 4-week interval
|
0.0729 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12655
|
—
|
|
QOL: EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Health Questionnaire Index Score
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), 12 years and older, EQ-5D index score, 3-week interval
|
0.0000 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00000
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4-Week dosing interval (Week 1 and Week 31); 3-Week dosing interval (Week 1 and Week 28)Population: Full Analysis Set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses. Number analyzed is the number of participants available for analysis in the specified category.
The EQ-5D-3L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome and was administered to all participants to assess the effect of the treatment on the participants' quality of life. The EQ-5D-3L includes a visual analog scale (VAS), a vertical scale that allows the participants to indicate their health state that day, and ranges from 0 (worst imaginable) to 100 (best imaginable), with higher scores indicating better health state.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=12 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
QOL: EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Health Questionnaire Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
Baseline (Week 1), 2-11 years, EQ-5D VAS score, 4-week interval
|
95.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.07
|
—
|
|
QOL: EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Health Questionnaire Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
Baseline (Week 1), 2-11 years, EQ-5D VAS score, 3-week interval
|
100.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is not estimable for single participant.
|
—
|
|
QOL: EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Health Questionnaire Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
Baseline (Week 1), 12 years and older, EQ-5D VAS score, 4-week interval
|
76.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.24
|
—
|
|
QOL: EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Health Questionnaire Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
Baseline (Week 1), 12 years and older, EQ-5D VAS score, 3-week interval
|
85.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.07
|
—
|
|
QOL: EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Health Questionnaire Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), 2-11 years, EQ-5D VAS score, 4-week interval
|
-5.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is not estimable for single participant.
|
—
|
|
QOL: EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Health Questionnaire Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), 2-11 years, EQ-5D VAS score, 3-week interval
|
-10 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is not estimable for single participant.
|
—
|
|
QOL: EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Health Questionnaire Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), 12 years and older, EQ-5D VAS score, 4-week interval
|
6.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.78
|
—
|
|
QOL: EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Health Questionnaire Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), 12 years and older, EQ-5D VAS score, 3-week interval
|
-2.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.54
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 31 for Participants with 4-Week Dosing Interval or Up to Week 28 for Participants with 3-Week Dosing IntervalPopulation: Full Analysis Set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once.
Treatment preference questionnaire is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess participants' preference towards the administration of new subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) therapy. There are 4-items on the questionnaire, which investigate a participant's preference on the clinic/hospital/home setting of receiving the immunoglobulin (IG) therapy, the participant's rating on the frequency and method of administration, and the participant's preference to continue receiving the IGSC treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, potential to self-administer=Like very much
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, potential to self-administer=No preference
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, potential to self-administer=Dislike
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, potential to self-administer=Dislike very much
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, ability to fit my treatment into my own schedule= Like
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, ability to fit my treatment into my own schedule= No Preference
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, overall convenience=Like
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, overall convenience=No preference
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, amount of time administration takes=Like
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, amount of time administration takes=No preference
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, amount of time administration takes=Dislike
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, complexity of administration process=Like
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, complexity of administration process=No preference
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, complexity of administration process=Dislike
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, My ability to self-administer without medical supervision=Like very much
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, My ability to self-administer without medical supervision=No preference
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, My ability to self-administer without medical supervision=Dislike
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, My ability to self-administer without medical supervision=Dislike very much
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, would you choose to continue receiving your treatment using IGg10% with rHuPH20 SC?=Yes
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, Before your participation, where did you receive your IG therapy?=At hospital
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, Before your participation, where did you receive your IG therapy?=At home
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, Before your participation, where did you receive your IG therapy?=Other
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, Where do you prefer to receive your IG therapy? = At hospital
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, Where do you prefer to receive your IG therapy? = At home
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, Where do you prefer to receive your IG therapy? = No preference
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, frequency of administration=Like very much
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, frequency of administration=Like
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, frequency of administration=No preference
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, number of needlesticks per month=Like
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, number of needlesticks per month=No preference
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, total time spent for my treatment per month = Like very much
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, total time spent for my treatment per month=Like
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, total time spent for my treatment per month=No preference
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, total time spent for my treatment per month=Dislike
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, ease of administration=Like
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, ease of administration=No preference
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, ease of administration=Dislike
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, ease of administration=Dislike very much
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, potential to self-administer=Like
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, The potential to self-administer = No preference
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, potential to self-administer=Dislike
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, potential to self-administer=Dislike very much
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, ability to fit my treatment into my own schedule= Like very much
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, ability to fit my treatment into my own schedule= Like
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, ability to fit my treatment into my own schedule= No preference
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, ability to fit my treatment into my own schedule= Dislike
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, overall convenience = Like
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, overall convenience = No preference
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, overall convenience = Dislike
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, amount of time administration takes = Like
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, amount of time administration takes = No preference
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, amount of time administration takes = Dislike
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, complexity of administration process=Like very much
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, complexity of administration process=Like
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, complexity of administration process=No preference
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, complexity of administration process=Dislike
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, complexity of administration process=Dislike very much
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, My ability to self-administer without medical supervision=Like very much
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, My ability to self-administer without medical supervision=Like
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, My ability to self-administer without medical supervision = No preference
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, My ability to self-administer without medical supervision = Dislike
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, My ability to self-administer without medical supervision = Dislike very much
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, choose to continue receiving your treatment using IGg 10% with rHuPH20 SC?=Yes
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
14 years and older, choose to continue receiving your treatment using IGg 10% with rHuPH20 SC?= No
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, Before your participation in the trial, where did you receive your IG therapy?=At home
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, Where do you prefer to receive your immunoglobulin therapy?=At hospital
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, Where do you prefer to receive your IG therapy?=At home
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, Where do you prefer to receive your IG therapy?=No Preference
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, frequency of administration=Like very much
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, frequency of administration=Like
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, Frequency of administration=No Preference
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, number of needlesticks per month=Like very much
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, number of needlesticks per month=Like
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, number of needlesticks per month=No preference
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, total time spent for my treatment per month=Like
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, total time spent for my treatment per month=No Preference
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, ease of administration= Like
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, ease of administration= No Preference
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, The ease of administration= Dislike
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Treatment Preference
2-13 years, Before your participation in trial, where did you receive your IG therapy?=At hospital
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4-Week dosing interval (Week 1 and Week 31); 3-Week dosing interval (Week 1 and Week 28)Population: Full Analysis Set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at given timepoint.
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) is a global satisfaction scale used to assess the overall level of participant's satisfaction or dissatisfaction with their medications. In this study, 2-12 years (parent as observer), 13 years and older (participant as observer) for TSQM health questionnaire will be analyzed. TSQM-9 is a 9-item, validated, self-administered instrument used to assess participant's satisfaction with medication. The three domains assessed are effectiveness, convenience, and global satisfaction. The score of each of the 3 domains is based on an algorithm to create a score of 0 to 100. Higher score indicated greater satisfaction in that domain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=12 Participants
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 27 for participants with 4-Week dosing interval or Week 25 for participants with 3-Week dosing interval.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Satisfaction: Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)
Baseline (Week 1), 2-12 years, Effectiveness, 4-week interval
|
64.81 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.208
|
—
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction: Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)
Baseline (Week 1), 2-12 years, Effectiveness, 3-week interval
|
94.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is not estimable for single participant.
|
—
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction: Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)
Baseline (Week 1), 2-12 years, Convenience, 4-week interval
|
44.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.245
|
—
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction: Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)
Baseline (Week 1), 2-12 years, Convenience, 3-week interval
|
38.89 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is not estimable for single participant.
|
—
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction: Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)
Baseline (Week 1), 2-12 years, Global satisfaction, 4-week interval
|
59.52 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.911
|
—
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction: Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)
Baseline (Week 1), 2-12 years, Global satisfaction, 3-week interval
|
100.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is not estimable for single participant.
|
—
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction: Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)
Baseline (Week 1), 13 years and older, Effectiveness, 4-week interval
|
64.81 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.812
|
—
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction: Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)
Baseline (Week 1), 13 years and older, Effectiveness, 3-week interval
|
63.89 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.928
|
—
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction: Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)
Baseline (Week 1), 13 years and older, Convenience, 4-week interval
|
62.04 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.694
|
—
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction: Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)
Baseline (Week 1), 13 years and older, Convenience, 3-week interval
|
44.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.000
|
—
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction: Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)
Baseline (Week 1), 13 years and older, Global satisfaction, 4-week interval
|
60.71 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.748
|
—
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction: Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)
Baseline (Week 1), 13 years and older, Global satisfaction, 3-week interval
|
64.29 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.102
|
—
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction: Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), 2-12 years, Effectiveness, 4-week interval
|
0.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.000
|
—
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction: Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), 2-12 years, Effectiveness, 3-week interval
|
-27.78 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is not estimable for single participant.
|
—
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction: Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), 2-12 years, Convenience, 4-week interval
|
13.89 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.928
|
—
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction: Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), 2-12 years, Convenience, 3-week interval
|
0.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is not estimable for single participant.
|
—
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction: Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), 2-12 years, Global satisfaction, 4-week interval
|
10.71 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.051
|
—
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction: Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), 2-12 years, Global satisfaction, 3-week interval
|
-28.57 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation is not estimable for single participant.
|
—
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction: Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), 13 years and older, Effectiveness, 4-week interval
|
-12.04 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.156
|
—
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction: Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), 13 years and older, Effectiveness, 3-week interval
|
2.78 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.928
|
—
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction: Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), 13 years and older, Convenience, 4-week interval
|
-3.70 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.688
|
—
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction: Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), 13 years and older, Convenience, 3-week interval
|
0.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.857
|
—
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction: Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), 13 years and older, Global satisfaction, 4-week interval
|
-13.10 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.885
|
—
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction: Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)
Change from Baseline (EOS/ET), 13 years and older, Global satisfaction, 3-week interval
|
-3.57 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.051
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Epoch 1: TAK-771 Ramp up Period
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Epoch 1: TAK-771 Ramp up Period
n=16 participants at risk
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution. The dose of 10% IGI was increased from 1/3 of full dose to full dose in 3 weeks for participants who received TAK-771 once every 3 weeks, or from 1/4 of full dose to full dose in 6 weeks for participants who received TAK-771 once every 4 weeks.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 participants at risk
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Endocrine disorders
Adrenal insufficiency
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper respiratory tract inflammation
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Epoch 1: TAK-771 Ramp up Period
n=16 participants at risk
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution. The dose of 10% IGI was increased from 1/3 of full dose to full dose in 3 weeks for participants who received TAK-771 once every 3 weeks, or from 1/4 of full dose to full dose in 6 weeks for participants who received TAK-771 once every 4 weeks.
|
Epoch 2: TAK-771 Full Dose Treatment Period
n=16 participants at risk
TAK-771 included IGI 10% and rHuPH20. Participants received subcutaneous infusion of rHuPH20 solution at a dose of 80 U/g IgG first, followed by SC infusion of 10% IGI within 10 minutes of completion of the infusion of rHuPH20 solution, every 3, or 4 weeks for up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain lower
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
General disorders
Administration site pain
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Aphthous ulcer
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
General disorders
Application site erythema
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchiectasis
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
12.5%
2/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Chronic sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
12.5%
2/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis allergic
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Dysmenorrhoea
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Faeces soft
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gingival bleeding
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gingival swelling
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
12.5%
2/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
General disorders
Infusion site erythema
|
12.5%
2/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
12.5%
2/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
General disorders
Infusion site pain
|
12.5%
2/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
General disorders
Infusion site swelling
|
12.5%
2/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site erythema
|
12.5%
2/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
12.5%
2/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site induration
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pain
|
12.5%
2/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
12.5%
2/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pruritus
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Joint dislocation
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
18.8%
3/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
18.8%
3/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Eye disorders
Ocular hyperaemia
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Oedema genital
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
12.5%
2/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
General disorders
Peripheral swelling
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
31.2%
5/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
31.2%
5/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinitis allergic
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Scrotal oedema
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Seasonal allergy
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subcutaneous haematoma
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
12.5%
2/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
General disorders
Vaccination site pain
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound
|
0.00%
0/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
6.2%
1/16 • From study start up to Week 28 for the 3-week dosing intervals and up to Week 31 for 4-week dosing intervals
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received investigational drug at least once. Epoch 2 Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received investigational drug at least once in Epoch 2.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The first study related publication will be a multi-center publication submitted within 24 months after conclusion or termination of a study at all sites. After such multi site publication, all proposed site publications and presentations will be submitted to sponsor for review 60 days in advance of publication. Site will remove Sponsor confidential information unrelated to study results. Sponsor can delay a proposed publication for another 60 days to preserve intellectual property.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER