Patient Satisfaction and Sensory Attributes Allergic Rhinitis Nasal Spray
NCT ID: NCT05146206
Last Updated: 2024-04-12
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
426 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-11-08
2022-02-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of RYALTRIS® Nasal Spray on Patients' Reported Outcomes
NCT05129306
Observational Study to Evaluate the Actual Use and Effectiveness of Dymista® Nasal Spray in Asian Patients
NCT05158972
Study To Evaluate Patient Preference, Satisfaction And Efficacy Of a Nasal Aerosol Versus an Aqueous Nasal Spray
NCT01401465
Evaluating the Need for New Rhinitis Treatment
NCT01875276
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of a Nasal Spray to Treat Perennial Allergic Rhinitis
NCT06051786
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To directly compare patient satisfaction with 2 different Allergic Rhinitis nasal sprays, an observational, cross-sectional study design with 2 independent samples was chosen. Participants will complete an online survey involving a Best-Worst scaling (BWS) task to determine satisfaction and importance index for sensory attributes.
The suggested treatment attributes are informed by a range of previous studies, including those conducted by Meltzer et al 2005 and Price et al 2020, and methodology from CaPPRe's own work in developing indices for importance and satisfaction of treatment attributes using BWS.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients on RYALTRIS
Patients who are currently using RYALTRIS nasal spray.
Observational
In this observational study, participants initated on RYALTRIS/DYMISTA nasal spray will complete a cross-sectional online survey that includes a Best-Worst Scaling task to capture their satisfaction and importance of various treatment attributes.
Patients on DYMISTA
Patients who are currently using DYMISTA nasal spray.
Observational
In this observational study, participants initated on RYALTRIS/DYMISTA nasal spray will complete a cross-sectional online survey that includes a Best-Worst Scaling task to capture their satisfaction and importance of various treatment attributes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Observational
In this observational study, participants initated on RYALTRIS/DYMISTA nasal spray will complete a cross-sectional online survey that includes a Best-Worst Scaling task to capture their satisfaction and importance of various treatment attributes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients above 18 years old
* Fluent in English
* Patients initiated on RYALTRIS® or DYMISTA® nasal spray in the last 12 months and currently using treatment
* Willing and able to provide consent to participate
Exclusion Criteria
* Are employed by a pharmaceutical company (to avoid conflict of interest)
* Are employed by a vaccine company (to avoid conflict of interest)
* Do not have access to the internet (to ensure validity of the data)
* Are unable to read and understand English (to ensure validity of the data)
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Seqirus
INDUSTRY
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals S.A.
INDUSTRY
Community and Patient Preference Research Pty Ltd
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Simon Fifer, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Community and Patient Preference Research Pty Ltd
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Community and Patient Preference Research Pty Ltd
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2019. Allergic rhinitis ('hay fever'). Cat. no. PHE 257. Canberra: AIHW. Viewed 01 May 2020, https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/chronic-respiratory-conditions/allergic-rhinitis-hay-fever/contents/allergic-rhinitis
Meltzer EO, Bardelas J, Goldsobel A, Kaiser H. A preference evaluation study comparing the sensory attributes of mometasone furoate and fluticasone propionate nasal sprays by patients with allergic rhinitis. Treat Respir Med. 2005;4(4):289-96. doi: 10.2165/00151829-200504040-00007.
Meltzer EO, Garadi R, Laforce C, Chadwick SJ, Berger WE, Gross G, Edwards MR, Crenshaw K, Wall GM. Comparative study of sensory attributes of two antihistamine nasal sprays: olopatadine 0.6% and azelastine 0.1%. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2008 Nov-Dec;29(6):659-68. doi: 10.2500/aap.2008.29.3181. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
Meltzer EO, Hadley J, Blaiss M, Benninger M, Kimel M, Kleinman L, Dupclay L, Garcia J, Leahy M, Georges G. Development of questionnaires to measure patient preferences for intranasal corticosteroids in patients with allergic rhinitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Feb;132(2):197-207. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.10.010.
Price D, Klimek L, Galffy G, Emmeluth M, Koltun A, Kopietz F, Nguyen DT, van Weissenbruch R, Pohl W, Kuhl HC, Scadding G, Mullol J. Allergic rhinitis and asthma symptoms in a real-life study of MP-AzeFlu to treat multimorbid allergic rhinitis and asthma. Clin Mol Allergy. 2020 Aug 6;18:15. doi: 10.1186/s12948-020-00130-9. eCollection 2020.
Louviere, J., Flynn, T., Marley, A., 2015. References. In Best-Worst Scaling: Theory, Methods and Applications Cambridge University, Cambridge, pp. 316-331
Muhlbacher AC, Kaczynski A, Zweifel P, Johnson FR. Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview. Health Econ Rev. 2016 Dec;6(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13561-015-0079-x. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20210902_2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.