Ablation of Esophageal Inlet Patches in Patients Referred for Bravo pH-Testing

NCT ID: NCT05131932

Last Updated: 2021-11-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-12-31

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with suspected extra-esophageal manifestations of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), such as cough, hoarseness, and globus, are often referred for pH testing. However, many of these symptoms may actually be due to an esophageal inlet patch. We aim to evaluate patients referred for pH testing to see if they have an inlet patch, to perform ablation of the inlet patch if detected, and then compare the outcomes of patients with an inlet patch who underwent ablation versus those without an inlet patch.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background The diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is difficult when patients present with extra-esophageal symptoms such as chronic cough, frequent throat clearing, globus sensation, sore throat, and hoarseness, as opposed to the traditional symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation.\[1-4\] These patients are often given a trial of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) to see if their symptoms improve. They often undergo an upper endoscopy, which is usually unrevealing,\[5\] and they may be evaluated by other specialties such as otolaryngology and pulmonology. Eventually, some of these patients are referred for esophageal pH-testing to evaluate for objective evidence of acid reflux.

The symptoms of extra-esophageal GERD (EE-GERD) are not specific for GERD and many of them overlap with the symptoms from inlet patches, also known as heterotopic gastric mucosa.\[6-7\] Inlet patches consist of small areas of gastric mucosa in the upper esophagus that are capable of producing acid.\[8-10\] Studies in which inlet patches are endoscopically ablated have shown improvement in several extra-esophageal symptoms including globus sensation, sore throat, and cough.\[11-15\] As inlet patches are notoriously overlooked on upper endoscopy\[16\] and can cause many of the same symptoms as EE-GERD, we suspect that they may be responsible for the symptoms in some patients who are referred for pH-testing due to suspected EE-GERD. We believe that a careful inspection of the upper esophagus will reveal inlet patches that were missed on initial endoscopy and that ablation of these inlet patches will help improve the patients' symptoms more than the standard treatment for EE-GERD.

Aims The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the improvement in symptoms of patients referred for pH-testing for suspected EE-GERD that are treated with endoscopic ablation of an inlet patch versus those who receive standard PPI therapy. Secondarily, we seek to determine the prevalence of inlet patches in these patients with reportedly normal endoscopies, as well as percentage of patients in this group with a positive pH study.

Methods Patients referred for pH-testing due to symptoms of possible EE-GERD will be evaluated. These patients will have their prior medical history reviewed. Those with a prior normal endoscopy and inadequate response to PPI therapy will be included.

Patients' symptoms will be assessed via a questionnaire across 8 domains including 6 symptoms of possible EE-GERD and 2 subjective scores of how the symptoms are affecting their lives (see Questionnaire below). A visual Likert scale from 0 to 10 will be used. An overall symptom score will be calculated based on the results of the 8 individual domains.

Patients will then undergo an upper endoscopy. During the endoscopy, care will be taken to assess for possible inlet patches. Advanced imaging techniques such as i-scan imaging will be used to aid in the detection of inlet patches. If one or more inlet patches are found, the number, size, and shape will be recorded, and it will be biopsied for histological confirmation. The inlet patch will then be ablated via the use of argon plasma coagulation (APC) as has been performed in prior studies.\[11-13\] During the endoscopy, a Bravo pH capsule will also be placed per standard protocol to complete a 48-hour pH study. The Bravo data will be interpreted according to standard procedure with a positive study defined as an elevated DeMeester score on either study day. All studies will be performed off of anti-acid medications such as PPIs.

The patients' symptoms will be re-assessed at 2 and 6 months following the endoscopy. This will be performed via telephone interviews with the patients completing the same symptom assessments as prior to the endoscopy. Changes in their medications and treatment as a result of the Bravo pH study results will also be evaluated.

The primary end point will be the symptom improvement in overall score in patients who underwent ablation of inlet patches versus those without inlet patches.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients (age 18 and above)
* Referred for pH-testing for evaluation of possible EE-GERD
* Prior upper endoscopy performed
* Prior trial of PPI with an inadequate response Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who do not give consent
* Patients with abnormalities on their prior endoscopy including a significant hiatal hernia (\>3 cm) or significant erosive esophagitis (Los Angeles class B or greater)
* Patients who did not fail a prior trial of PPI therapy Anticipated number of subjects: 100

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

GERD Cough Metaplasia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Inlet patch

Patients found to have an inlet patch on upper endoscopy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Endoscopic ablation of inlet patch

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endoscopic ablation of inlet patch using argon plasma coagulation (APC)

Controls

Patients without an inlet patch on upper endoscopy

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endoscopic ablation of inlet patch

Endoscopic ablation of inlet patch using argon plasma coagulation (APC)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients (age 18 and above)
* Referred for pH-testing for evaluation of possible extraesophageal-GERD
* Prior upper endoscopy performed
* Prior trial of PPI with an inadequate response

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who do not give consent
* Patients with abnormalities on their prior endoscopy including a significant hiatal hernia (\>3 cm) or significant erosive esophagitis (Los Angeles class B or greater)
* Patients who did not fail a prior trial of PPI therapy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Vaezi MF, Katzka D, Zerbib F. Extraesophageal Symptoms and Diseases Attributed to GERD: Where is the Pendulum Swinging Now? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jul;16(7):1018-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29427733 (View on PubMed)

Madanick RD. Extraesophageal presentations of GERD: where is the science? Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2014 Mar;43(1):105-20. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2013.11.007. Epub 2013 Dec 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24503362 (View on PubMed)

Ghisa M, Della Coletta M, Barbuscio I, Marabotto E, Barberio B, Frazzoni M, De Bortoli N, Zentilin P, Tolone S, Ottonello A, Lorenzon G, Savarino V, Savarino E. Updates in the field of non-esophageal gastroesophageal reflux disorder. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Sep;13(9):827-838. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2019.1645593. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31322443 (View on PubMed)

Sidhwa F, Moore A, Alligood E, Fisichella PM. Diagnosis and Treatment of the Extraesophageal Manifestations of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Ann Surg. 2017 Jan;265(1):63-67. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001907.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27455157 (View on PubMed)

Zullo A, Fiorini G, Bassotti G, Bachetti F, Monica F, Macor D, Paoluzi OA, Scaccianoce G, Portincasa P, De Francesco V, Lorenzetti R, Saracino IM, Pavoni M, Vaira D. Upper Endoscopy in Patients with Extra-Oesophageal Reflux Symptoms: A Multicentre Study. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2020 Aug;27(5):312-317. doi: 10.1159/000505581. Epub 2020 Feb 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32999903 (View on PubMed)

von Rahden BH, Stein HJ, Becker K, Liebermann-Meffert D, Siewert JR. Heterotopic gastric mucosa of the esophagus: literature-review and proposal of a clinicopathologic classification. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Mar;99(3):543-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04082.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15056100 (View on PubMed)

Ciocalteu A, Popa P, Ionescu M, Gheonea DI. Issues and controversies in esophageal inlet patch. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug 14;25(30):4061-4073. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i30.4061.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31435164 (View on PubMed)

Galan AR, Katzka DA, Castell DO. Acid secretion from an esophageal inlet patch demonstrated by ambulatory pH monitoring. Gastroenterology. 1998 Dec;115(6):1574-6. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70038-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9834287 (View on PubMed)

Hamilton JW, Thune RG, Morrissey JF. Symptomatic ectopic gastric epithelium of the cervical esophagus. Demonstration of acid production with Congo red. Dig Dis Sci. 1986 Apr;31(4):337-42. doi: 10.1007/BF01311666.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3956328 (View on PubMed)

Nakajima H, Munakata A, Sasaki Y, Yoshida Y. pH profile of esophagus in patients with inlet patch of heterotopic gastric mucosa after tetragastrin stimulation. An endoscopic approach. Dig Dis Sci. 1993 Oct;38(10):1915-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01296118.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8404414 (View on PubMed)

Meining A, Bajbouj M, Preeg M, Reichenberger J, Kassem AM, Huber W, Brockmeyer SJ, Hannig C, Hofler H, Prinz C, Schmid RM. Argon plasma ablation of gastric inlet patches in the cervical esophagus may alleviate globus sensation: a pilot trial. Endoscopy. 2006 Jun;38(6):566-70. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-925362.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16802267 (View on PubMed)

Bajbouj M, Becker V, Eckel F, Miehlke S, Pech O, Prinz C, Schmid RM, Meining A. Argon plasma coagulation of cervical heterotopic gastric mucosa as an alternative treatment for globus sensations. Gastroenterology. 2009 Aug;137(2):440-4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.053. Epub 2009 May 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19410576 (View on PubMed)

Klare P, Meining A, von Delius S, Wolf P, Konukiewitz B, Schmid RM, Bajbouj M. Argon plasma coagulation of gastric inlet patches for the treatment of globus sensation: it is an effective therapy in the long term. Digestion. 2013;88(3):165-71. doi: 10.1159/000355274. Epub 2013 Oct 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24157960 (View on PubMed)

Dunn JM, Sui G, Anggiansah A, Wong T. Radiofrequency ablation of symptomatic cervical inlet patch using a through-the-scope device: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Dec;84(6):1022-1026.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.06.037. Epub 2016 Jul 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27373671 (View on PubMed)

Kristo I, Rieder E, Paireder M, Schwameis K, Jomrich G, Dolak W, Parzefall T, Riegler M, Asari R, Schoppmann SF. Radiofrequency ablation in patients with large cervical heterotopic gastric mucosa and globus sensation: Closing the treatment gap. Dig Endosc. 2018 Mar;30(2):212-218. doi: 10.1111/den.12959. Epub 2017 Oct 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28884487 (View on PubMed)

Peitz U, Vieth M, Evert M, Arand J, Roessner A, Malfertheiner P. The prevalence of gastric heterotopia of the proximal esophagus is underestimated, but preneoplasia is rare - correlation with Barrett's esophagus. BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul 12;17(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0644-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28701149 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0205-21-ASF

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id