Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-07-01
2023-08-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
SRS is a technique where a high dose of radiation is delivered through multiple fields, often as rotational intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), where the beam is aimed at the tumor from everchanging angles, in order to minimize the dose to the surrounding tissue. In contrast to other radiation modalities, where a margin is added to the target in order to eradicate tumor cells that are not visible on imaging, SRS employs very small margins because brain metastases tend to be localized with sharp boundaries to surrounding tissue. The relative low dose absorbed by the surrounding tissue allows for delivery of the whole radiation dose to the tumor in one to three treatment sessions ('fractions'), as opposed to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy which is delivered in multiple fractions for the protection of surrounding healthy tissue.
As a whole, SRS results in high rates of local tumor control (65-90%) and low rates of toxicity (10-15%), which is usually mild. The most significant adverse event following SRS is radionecrosis, which is estimated to occur in 5-25% of patients. This is a condition which is poorly defined but is commonly used to describe a situation where the contrast enhancing area in the irradiated volume increases, often accompanied by increasing edema in the surrounding tissue. The condition may or may not cause symptoms. In cases of symptomatic, progressive radionecrosis, oral corticosteroids such as prednisolone may be needed for longer periods of time. Differentiation between relapsed metastasis and radionecrosis is notoriously difficult and represents one of the major diagnostic challenges in all of neuro-oncology. Advanced imaging techniques such as dynamic MRI (e.g. perfusion weighted images) or PET (positron emission tomography) have been used to aid in differentiation in experimental studies, but this currently remains an area of research. The development of the brain lesion over time and use of close follow-up using MRI will most often aid in interpretation of the images by the multidisciplinary team conference consisting of a radiologist, a radiation oncologist and a neurosurgeon.
There is no standard treatment in case of local tumor relapse following SRS. Patients who have not previously received WBI may be offered this, but the possible detrimental effects on neurocognition and quality of life are well documented4 and many clinicians as well as patients prefer to avoid this for as long as possible. Few patients in this category are recommended surgical resection.
Salvage SRS (repeated SRS to the same area at time of relapse) is commonly practiced at some institutions, Rigshospitalet being one of them, but the evidence to support routine use is sparse. The treatment has been evaluated only in retrospective studies. These have found high rates of local control (70-90%), but as adverse events and side effects cannot be evaluated from retrospective studies without risk of critical bias, the safety of this treatment remains to be established.
Aim of the study The Re-TREAT study is a prospective clinical, phase 2, interventional, single-arm, multicenter trial with patients with local relapse of one or more brain metastases. In the trial, they are treated with salvage SRS. The aim is to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of salvage SRS. The primary outcome is local control of the relapsed tumor and the secondary endpoints include toxicity as evaluated by the investigator and quality of life measured as a patient reported outcome. As an exploratory endpoint, the value of advanced MRI and PET-imaging as a biomarker for prediction of response to treatment or toxicity will be studied.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment arm
Treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery
Repeated stereotactic radiosurgery
Repeated stereotactic radiosurgery to recurring brain metastases
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Repeated stereotactic radiosurgery
Repeated stereotactic radiosurgery to recurring brain metastases
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Progression of previously treated lesion as decided by the multidisciplinary team conference
* Previous single fraction SRS in area in question and dose plans must be available electronically
* Previous single fraction SRS given \> 3 months previously
* ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status ≤2
* Life expectancy \>3 months
* Signed written consent.
* Patients may have more than one recurring lesion and may also have new, untreated metastases which may be treated with standard SRS (up to a total of 4 metastases in accordance with Danish national guidelines).
Exclusion Criteria
* Target lesions located in- or in proximity to eloquent brain areas that require reduction of radiotherapy dose
* Target lesion gross tumor volume (GTV) for radiotherapy greater than 14,1 cm3 (equivalent to a sphere with a diameter of 3 cm)
* Current or planned concomitant medical treatment that is likely to be active against brain metastases (e.g. tyrosine kinase inhibitors for EGFR-positive (epidermal growth factor receptor) non-small cell lung cancer) or that may influence interpretation of images (e.g. bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody directed towards VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor)) in the opinion of the investigators
* Contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging using Gadolinium contrast enhancement (e.g. pacemaker, metallic implant or impaired renal function)
* Rapid extracranial disease progression that in the opinion of the investigators confer a high risk of drop out from the study without evaluation scan at 3 months
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Søren Møller
MD, Consultant
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Søren Møller, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Søren Møller, MD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RE-TREAT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id