Interrupting HIV and TB Stigma in the Household in Uganda

NCT ID: NCT05124665

Last Updated: 2024-02-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

612 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-25

Study Completion Date

2022-08-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators will carry out a prospective, household cluster-randomized, implementation trial evaluating a complex, multi-component, social and behavioral intervention designed to normalize the acceptance of HIV testing in the household and increase diagnosis of HIV.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

An estimated 39 million people worldwide are living with HIV, but nearly half do not know their status because they are unaware that they are at risk, unable to access counseling and testing, or unwilling to accept testing because of stigma and fear. Layered on to the stigma of HIV is the risk of tuberculosis (TB), the leading cause of death among persons living with HIV (PLWH). Home testing is a promising approach to increase testing and linkage to care for HIV because it can reach individuals outside the health system, eliminate the costs of traveling for testing, offer testing in a familiar environment, and increase engagement with care among those found to be living with HIV. Nevertheless, many individuals offered home HIV testing in sub-Saharan Africa decline to test.

The investigators developed a complex intervention to increase uptake of testing for HIV among household members by reducing perceptions of stigma associated with HIV and testing for HIV. The intervention involves lay health workers (LHWs) delivering a novel invitation strategy for HIV testing in households that includes 1) acceptance-optimized sequencing, 2) prosocial messaging, and 3) salivary HIV testing. The investigators will administer HIV and TB stigma scales before and after the invitation. The investigators will conduct a household randomized controlled trial to test the intervention's impact on household HIV stigma and uptake of testing among household members undergoing TB contact investigation. The investigators will measure our co-primary outcomes of HIV and TB stigma using standardized instruments before invitation and after completion of post-test counseling. The investigators will measure the proportion consenting to HIV testing, yield of HIV diagnoses, and the proportion of new PLWH linked to HIV care at 1 month and reassess household HIV and TB stigma at 3 months.

This study will be conducted in Kampala, Uganda, and will involve TB index patients and their household contacts. Households will be recruited and enrolled through index patients initiating treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) at Kampala Capital City Authority health facilities. The investigators will enroll index patients and their households from Kiswa, Kawaala, and Kisenyi Health Centers, each a public-sector, primary care facility.

This study will enroll households (index patients + their household contacts). Only household contacts are eligible for participation; close contacts are not eligible. For the purposes of this study, household contacts are defined as those individuals "sleeping under the same roof" as the index patient for one or more nights within the past three months.

Upon encountering a patient initiating treatment for TB or returning for 2-week follow-up, study CHWs will assess index patients for household-level eligibility for the study. All index patients whose households meet these criteria will be asked to provide verbal consent after reviewing an information sheet. If the index patient is a minor (age \< 18 years), the guardian of the index patient will be asked to provide verbal consent.

After study enrollment, a CHW will work with the index patient and, if available, treatment supporter to schedule the home visit. Households will be randomly assigned to one of the two CHW teams to receive the intervention or standard or care strategy.

After the enrollment of the household through the index patient, household contact investigation will take place. All household contacts who meet these criteria will be asked to provide verbal consent after reviewing an information sheet. If the contact is a minor (aged 15-17), he or she will be asked to provide verbal assent with his/her parent/guardian providing consent. Enrolling in the study does not require eligibility for or consent to HIV testing. Those who choose to participate in the study and are eligible for HIV testing will be subsequently offered testing and may consent or decline. Those who choose to participate in the study and report conditions that render them ineligible for HIV testing, such as already known to be a PLWH, testing negative within the last three months, or currently in TB treatment, will not be offered HIV testing but will be eligible to participate in other study procedures.

Variable block randomization will be done at the level of the household and will be performed at the time of household enrollment. Block sizes will have a minimum of 4 households, a maximum of 8 households. The investigators will utilize Study Randomizer, an online randomization tool with concealed allocation, to generate the allocation sequence. When a CHW determines that an index patient is eligible for the study, and after the index patient or guardian has provided verbal informed consent, the CHW will place a phone call to the study coordinator. The study coordinator will then enroll the household using the Study Randomizer tool and let the CHW know the study allocation. The CHW will then record the appropriate allocation in the survey software, along with the randomization ID, and contact the appropriate CHW team for the household visit. The index patient will be given the name of the community health worker who will be visiting the household, and immediately connected with that person by telephone to arrange the home visit.

Households randomized to intervention group (Social Support Group) will be offered the social-behavioral intervention. Households randomized to the standard of care group (Standard of Care) will be offered oral testing without any social-behavioral intervention. CHWs will operate in teams that are always assigned to the same arm of the study. There will be three teams of CHWs in total: one intervention group, one standard of care group, and one clinic-based group that will always carry out initial enrollment of index patients and record any clinic follow-up by individuals in either arm of the study.

Regardless of intervention or control arm, CHWs will deliver a short, 13-item TB and HIV stigma scale to all household contacts at the beginning (prior to TB evaluation) and end of the household visit (after all TB and HIV procedures). The scale was adapted from the Van Rie TB HIV stigma scale specifically for this context. The scales will be administered first at the beginning of the home visit, then again at its conclusion.

The primary outcome is uptake of HIV testing, defined as the proportion of eligible individuals in the household who undergo testing after a test offer compared between the intervention arm and the standard of care arm..

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hiv Tuberculosis Social Behavior Stigma, Social Stigmatization

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
There are 3 teams of community health workers (CHWs) in total: one intervention, one standard of care, and one clinic-based that will always carry out initial enrollment and record clinic follow-up for both arms. Blinding of the CHWs is not feasible because it is a behavioral intervention that is easily recognized and CHWs must be trained to deliver either the standard of care or the intervention strategy. CHWs will collect data for the outcomes. CHWs will be separated into two teams and will only have electronic permissions to access training, procedures, forms, and contact information related to their assigned allocation within the electronic case record forms. They will be blinded to randomization procedures and outcomes. Participants will be blinded to their randomization assignment. Investigators and study staff will be blinded to study outcomes until the database is locked at the end of the trial. The onsite study coordinator who manages randomization will not be blinded.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Social Support

CHWs will offer HIV testing to the individual nominated by the index patient as most likely to test. If this person is not present, CHWs will decide which contact should be offered testing first. CHWs will use a prosocial script for HIV testing: "Knowing your status sets a good example for your household." CHWs will follow an "opt-out" strategy: "This test kit is approved by the Ministry of Health and used in KCCA health facilities. I am going to offer you a free HIV test now, is that okay?". If the initial household contact who is offered HIV testing agrees to test, the CHW will ask if he/she is willing to share his/her decision to test with other members of the household: "Would you like to share your decision to test with the others? Sharing is completely optional. However, learning that someone else in their household decided to test sometimes gives people the strength to test themselves. Sharing your decision might help another person find the strength to test."

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Social Support

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The intervention to be evaluated in this study is a multidimensional, socio-behavioral "Norming" intervention. The various components of this intervention are designed to harness household dynamics and prosocial inclinations to encourage individuals to accept the HIV testing invitation. Each component is briefly described in the arm description.

Standard of Care

As a control for the socio-behavioral intervention, the control arm will lack the socio-behavioral intervention components. The order of testing invitation will be decided by the CHW; and CHWs will be trained at baseline to provide standard, opt-in framing of test offers, without any mention of asking contacts to share their testing decision with other household contacts. Oral HIV kits will also be used in control households.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Social Support

The intervention to be evaluated in this study is a multidimensional, socio-behavioral "Norming" intervention. The various components of this intervention are designed to harness household dynamics and prosocial inclinations to encourage individuals to accept the HIV testing invitation. Each component is briefly described in the arm description.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Intervention Norming: Socio-Behavioral

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Index patient or legal guardian agrees to study procedures in addition to routine contact investigation
* Index patient has at least 2 self-reported household contacts age 15 or above
* Household is within the boundaries of the Kampala Capital City Authority, Uganda
* Does not have multi-drug resistant (MDR) TB

Contact Participant Eligibility:

* Household contact age ≥15 years
* Agrees to study procedures in addition to routine contact investigation
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

New York University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Makerere University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Walimu

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Yale University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

J. Lucian Davis, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Yale School of Public Health

Achilles Katamba, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Makerere University

Mari Armstrong-Hough, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

New York University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Makerere University

Kampala, , Uganda

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Uganda

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Armstrong-Hough M, Ggita J, Gupta AJ, Shelby T, Nangendo J, Ayen DO, Davis JL, Katamba A. Assessing a norming intervention to promote acceptance of HIV testing and reduce stigma during household tuberculosis contact investigation: protocol for a cluster-randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2022 May 25;12(5):e061508. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061508.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35613785 (View on PubMed)

Armstrong-Hough M, Gupta AJ, Ggita J, Nangendo J, Katamba A, Davis JL. Using group norms to promote acceptance of HIV testing during household tuberculosis contact investigation: A household-randomized trial. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 May 3:2024.05.02.24306703. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.02.24306703.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38746428 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R21TW011270-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

2000024852

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

1R21TW011270

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Home-based AIDS Care Project
NCT00119093 TERMINATED NA