Continuous EKG Monitoring Using S-Patch Ex : Prospective Observational Study (S-patch Registry)
NCT ID: NCT05119725
Last Updated: 2021-11-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
2450 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-03-15
2023-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Early diagnosis of AF might enable oral anticoagulant therapy and prevent unwanted consequences of undetected disease, leading to the suggestion that screening for AF might be beneficial in populations at risk. However, there is still debate about whether screen-detected AF bears a similar stroke and mortality risk profile to clinically detected AF, particularly when AF screening is done at a higher intensity than single-time point.
The absence of studies reporting on hard clinical endpoints in AF screening has led to differences in recommendations globally. Most notably, systematic screening for AF is to be considered according to 2020 European guidelines, whereas the US Preventive Services Task Force concluded that current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for AF.
The incidence of screen-detected AF strongly depends on the population screened and duration/intensity of screening. Single-time point screening of a general population ≥65 years of age detects undiagnosed AF in 1.4%, and the AF detected is largely persistent. In a large population-based study of individuals 75 to 76 years of age, a more intense 2-week screening program using twice-daily intermittent handheld ECG recordings identified AF in 3.0% (0.5% on the initial ECG4). The identical protocol restricted to those with ≥1 additional stroke risk factor identified 7.4% with AF.
This study was designed in to two arms. The purpose of Arm 1 is to upgrade the artificial intelligence by collecting the continued ECG monitoring data in patients with previous diagnosed AF. The purpose of Arm 2 is to investigate the detection rate of AF using systematic, intensive AF screening with continuous ECG monitoring and the rate of clinical outcome in individuals at high risk during one year follow-up.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients with atrial fibrillation
Patients with previous diagnosis of atrial fibrillation
continous 3 day EKG monitoring with S-Patch Cardio
continous 3 day EKG monitoring with S-Patch Cardio
Non-AF patients with high stroke risk
Non-AF patients with high stroke risk
continous 3 day EKG monitoring with S-Patch Cardio
continous 3 day EKG monitoring with S-Patch Cardio
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
continous 3 day EKG monitoring with S-Patch Cardio
continous 3 day EKG monitoring with S-Patch Cardio
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Those with previous diagnosis of atrial fibrillation
3. Those without atrial fibrillation, but high stroke risk
Exclusion Criteria
2. Those without internet connection
19 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Yonsei University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Boyoung Joung
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1-2021-0002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id