Efficacy of GBT vs SRP+US, in the Treatment of Severe Generalized Periodontitis.
NCT ID: NCT05112471
Last Updated: 2021-11-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-11-22
2020-04-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Unfortunately it seems that, after the initial therapy, many patients still present with active pockets (residual pockets) requiring further treatment and posing a risk of disease progression. This might be due to limitations of the instruments applied and patient-related factors. Air-polishing with low-abrasiveness powders seems to be very effective in the removal of supra- and sub-gingival biofilm and could provide additional benefits during the treatment of pockets.
The aim of this randomized, controlled, split-mouth study was to compare the efficacy of full-mouth air-polishing followed by ultrasonic debridement (GBT) versus traditional Scaling and Root Planing (SRP), in terms of pocket closure in patients with stage III-IV periodontitis.
To test this hypothesis, the mouth of each patients, upon initial evaluation, were divided in 2 parts:
1. The control group undergoing a standard procedure: ultrasonic debridement with an ultrasonic scaler for remove supra and sub gingival calculus, manual debridement with curettes at deep pathological pockets (PPD \> 4mm) and rubber cup with polishing to remove supra gingival biofilm and plaque.
2. The study group undergoing the innovative air polishing procedure: airflow with erythritol powder to remove supra and sub gingival biofilm and plaque, perioflow at deep pathological pockets (PPD \> 4mm) and ultrasonic debridement with an ultrasonic scaler for remove supra and sub gingival calculus.
The prevalence of residual pockets will be evaluated at 6 weeks and 3 months after the initial therapy and compared between the two groups.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A prospective, single-masked, randomized, split-mouth, longitudinal clinical trial.
OUTCOME:
1. The primary outcome was the number of experimental sites (PPD \>4mm and \<10mm) becoming closed pockets (PPD ≤ 4mm) at 6 weeks (T1) and 3 months (T2) after initial therapy.
2. Secondary outcomes were the variations in PPD, REC (Clinical Gingival Recession), CAL (Clinical Attachment Level), BOP (Bleeding On Probing) and PI (Plaque Index) at the experimental sites and treatment time.
A 10% difference in the primary outcome between the two protocols was set as the threshold to define inferiority/non-inferiority of the Test treatment.
STUDY POPULATION:
thirty-two (32) adults, aged 18-75 years, will be entered into study (randomized).
Randomized subjects who deviate from the protocol (major protocol deviation) and, for this reason, are excluded from the analysis, will be replaced to guarantee that the sample required for the analysis (32) is reached.
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
* Signed Informed Consent Form.
* Male and female subjects, aged 18-75 years, inclusive.
* Good general health (free of systemic diseases such as diabetes, HIV infection or genetic disorder, ongoing malignant disease of any type that could influence the outcome of the treatment and might interfere with the evaluation of the study objectives).
* Diagnosis of Stage III-IV periodontitis;17
* At least 6 sites per quadrant with Pocket Probing Depth (PPD) ≥ 3mm;
* At least 5 teeth per quadrant;
* Availability for the 3-month duration of the study for an assigned subject.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Guided Biofilm Therapy
Airflow with erythritol powder to remove supra and sub gingival biofilm and plaque, perioflow with erythritol powder at deep pathological pockets (PPD \> 4mm) and ultrasonic debridement with an ultrasonic scaler for remove supra and sub gingival calculus.
Airflow, Perioflow and Erythritol powder and ultrasonic debridement
Airflow and Perioflow combined with Erythritol powder will be used as an adjunct therapy
Scaling and Root Planning - Ultrasonic Debridement
Ultrasonic debridement with an ultrasonic scaler for remove supra and sub gingival calculus, manual debridement with curettes at deep pathological pockets (PPD \> 4mm) and rubber cup with polishing to remove supra gingival biofilm and plaque.
Ultrasonic debridement and curettes
traditional Scaling and Root Planing with curettes and ultrasonic scaler
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Airflow, Perioflow and Erythritol powder and ultrasonic debridement
Airflow and Perioflow combined with Erythritol powder will be used as an adjunct therapy
Ultrasonic debridement and curettes
traditional Scaling and Root Planing with curettes and ultrasonic scaler
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male and female subjects, aged 18-75 years, with diagnosis of severe generalized periodontitis.
* Good general health (free of systemic diseases such as diabetes, HIV infection or genetic disorder, ongoing malignant disease of any type that could influence the outcome of the treatment and might interfere with the evaluation of the study objectives).
* Diagnosis of Stage III-IV periodontitis;
* At least 6 sites per quadrant with Pocket Probing Depth (PPD) ≥ 3mm;
* At least 5 teeth per quadrant;
* Availability for the 3-month duration of the study for an assigned subject.
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy or nursing.
* Radiotherapy or Chemotherapy.
* BPCO (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), asma.
* Systemic long-term corticosteroid treatment.
* Antibiotic treatment in the period of 3 months before the start of the study.
* Non surgical therapy in the period of 3 months before the start of the study.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Magda Mensi
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Magda Mensi
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Magda Mensi
Brescia, Lombardy, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ERISRP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id