Quantitative Assessment of Pupillary Light Reflex in Acute Carbon Monoxide Poisoning
NCT ID: NCT05110820
Last Updated: 2021-11-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
104 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-08-01
2021-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
An automated pupillometer has been used in the intensive care unit to quantitatively assess the PLR. Therefore, we hypothesized that quantitative assessment of PLR might be associated with neurocognitive sequelae after acute CO poisoning. The purpose of this study was to assess the value of quantitative pupillary reactivity (NPi and qPLR) in comparison to that of sPLR in predicting neurocognitive outcome at 1 month after acute CO poisoning.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
An automated pupillometer has been used in the intensive care unit to quantitatively assess the PLR. Quantitative PLR (qPLR), which is expressed as the percentage pupillary constriction in response to a calibrated light stimulus, was better in predicting neurological outcome after cardiac arrest (CA) compared to standard light reflex. In addition, the Neurological Pupil index (NPi) has been validated as a tool for assessing prognosis after CA because it is not influenced by medications (especially opioids and neuromuscular blocking agents) or small pupil size.
Therefore, the investigators hypothesized that quantitative assessment of PLR might be associated with neurocognitive sequelae after acute CO poisoning. The purpose of this study was to assess the value of quantitative pupillary reactivity (NPi and qPLR) in comparison to that of sPLR in predicting neurocognitive outcome at 1 month after acute CO poisoning.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Acute CO poisoning
A diagnosis of CO poisoning was made according to medical history and carboxyhaemoglobin \>5% (\>10% in smokers).
Automated quantitative pupillometer
Quantitative measurement of pupillary variables was performed at the time of arrival at the ED (0 h), and at the 6-, 12-, and 24-h time points on hospital day (HD) 1. The worst value among those recorded within 24 h and during the total measurement period was selected as the 24-h and total lowest values. If a patient was discharged before HD 3, measurements were taken only until discharge. The initial value was measured within 1 h after arrival at the ED because of the requisite time for obtaining informed consent before enrollment. At each time point, the lowest values for the NPi and qPLR of each eye were retained for analysis. The sPLR (standard PLR) was serially measured in the ED and after admission by emergency physicians using a manual penlight. We classified the reactivity of the sPLR as reactive, sluggish, or non-reactive. Non-reactive sPLR was defined when pupillary reactivity was not identified bilaterally.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Automated quantitative pupillometer
Quantitative measurement of pupillary variables was performed at the time of arrival at the ED (0 h), and at the 6-, 12-, and 24-h time points on hospital day (HD) 1. The worst value among those recorded within 24 h and during the total measurement period was selected as the 24-h and total lowest values. If a patient was discharged before HD 3, measurements were taken only until discharge. The initial value was measured within 1 h after arrival at the ED because of the requisite time for obtaining informed consent before enrollment. At each time point, the lowest values for the NPi and qPLR of each eye were retained for analysis. The sPLR (standard PLR) was serially measured in the ED and after admission by emergency physicians using a manual penlight. We classified the reactivity of the sPLR as reactive, sluggish, or non-reactive. Non-reactive sPLR was defined when pupillary reactivity was not identified bilaterally.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with a history of ophthalmic surgery which might have affected the PLR
* Patients with baseline cognitive deficit
* Refusal to enroll in this study
* Discharge from the ED or transfer to another hospital within 24 hours
* Expired in the ED
* Co-ingestion of drugs, such as hypnotics, that may affect the PLR
* No follow-up for the neurocognitive outcome
19 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
OTHER
Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yong Sung Cha
Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
Wŏnju, Gangwon-do, South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CO-pupillometer
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id