Evaluation of the Clinical Benefit of a Transmitter for Contralateral Routing of Signals (CROS)

NCT ID: NCT05106413

Last Updated: 2022-04-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

23 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-26

Study Completion Date

2022-03-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will evaluate the clinical benefit of a transmitter for contralateral routing of signals. The benefit will be evaluated in noisy environments regarding speech intelligibility when the CROS system is adjusted to different microphone settings. Additionally, data regarding overall system stability, crash reboot rate, sound quality and connectivity will be obtained over a period of time to validate the CROS system in combination with smartphone and accessories. This study is a confirmatory study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Unilateral Hearing Loss (UHL) can be defined as any degree of permanent hearing loss on one ear with normal hearing in the opposite ear. Unilateral hearing loss can be debilitating associated with audiological, psychosocial and educational challenges. Audiological challenges include the reduced ability to localize sounds, reduced awareness on the unaidable side and difficulties hearing in noise or at a distance.

One solution for unaidable UHL is Contralateral Routing of Signals (CROS) and Bilateral Contralateral routing of signals (BiCROS) using a so- called CROS transmitter together with a hearing aid.

The rationale for this clinical investigation is to collect clinical data with a rechargeable CROS transmitter to evaluate the benefits of a BiCROS fitting compared to the alternative treatment option, the monaural hearing aid fitting, and to no treatment in noisy listening situations.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hearing Loss

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Speech Intelligibility with CROS device

The focus of this study is on Speech Intelligibility (SI), evaluated by the Oldenburg Sentence test (OLSA), which measures a speech recognition threshold (SRT) in dB SNR (signal to noise ratio).

Therefore each participant will perform the tests with the experimental rechargeable CROS transmitter (CROS) in different interventions, like comparison to monaural fitting and unaided condition.

All participants will perform the same tests. The order of the intervention in the speech test is randomized, but will be performed in the same visit by each participant.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

BiCROS fitting

Intervention Type OTHER

Each participant will be fitted with the experimental CROS device on the poorer, unaidable ear and with a compatible hearing device on the other ear.

Monaural fitting

Intervention Type OTHER

Each participant will be fitted with a hearing aid on the better hearing ear and no device on the poorer, unaidable ear.

Monaural hearing aid fitting acts as control intervention.

Unaided condition

Intervention Type OTHER

No treatment, i.e. the participants are not fitted with a CROS device and/ or hearing aid.

Unaided condition acts as control intervention.

CROS baseline

Intervention Type OTHER

Each participant will be fitted with the experimental CROS device on the poorer, unaidable ear and with a compatible device on the other ear. The difference to the BiCROS condition is the setup of the microphones in the CROS device and the compatible hearing device.

This test condition is only tested for speech intelligibility in diffuse noise and acts as control intervention.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

BiCROS fitting

Each participant will be fitted with the experimental CROS device on the poorer, unaidable ear and with a compatible hearing device on the other ear.

Intervention Type OTHER

Monaural fitting

Each participant will be fitted with a hearing aid on the better hearing ear and no device on the poorer, unaidable ear.

Monaural hearing aid fitting acts as control intervention.

Intervention Type OTHER

Unaided condition

No treatment, i.e. the participants are not fitted with a CROS device and/ or hearing aid.

Unaided condition acts as control intervention.

Intervention Type OTHER

CROS baseline

Each participant will be fitted with the experimental CROS device on the poorer, unaidable ear and with a compatible device on the other ear. The difference to the BiCROS condition is the setup of the microphones in the CROS device and the compatible hearing device.

This test condition is only tested for speech intelligibility in diffuse noise and acts as control intervention.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* hearing impaired adults, with \& w/o hearing aids (experiences)
* good written and spoken (Swiss) German language skills
* ability to fill in a questionnaire conscientiously
* informed consent as documented by signature
* asymmetric hearing loss: one unaidable ear (min. N6 hearing loss) / the other ear with N3 or N4 hearing loss
* availability of Smartphone
* availability of TV or Tablet
* ability to operate and handle the investigational device
* ability to describe listening impressions/experiences and the use of the hearing aid
* Ability to produce a reliable hearing test result

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindications to the medical device:
* aidable hearing loss on the intended CROS side
* acute tinnitus (in either one ear and occurrence less than three months)
* anatomical deformity of the CROS ear (e.g. absence of the auricle)
* Known hypersensitivity or allergy to materials of the investigational device
* any auricle deformities, that prevents secure placement of the (test) devices
* no willingness to test the investigational device system
* no willingness to test the investigational device system for at least 8h a day
* Hint for psychological problems from investigators point of view
* reported fluctuating hearing that could influence the test result
* reported symptoms of vertigo and dizziness by participants
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sonova AG

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sonova AG

Stäfa, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bagatto M, DesGeorges J, King A, Kitterick P, Laurnagaray D, Lewis D, Roush P, Sladen DP, Tharpe AM. Consensus practice parameter: audiological assessment and management of unilateral hearing loss in children. Int J Audiol. 2019 Dec;58(12):805-815. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1654620. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31486692 (View on PubMed)

Snapp HA, Hoffer ME, Spahr A, Rajguru S. Application of Wireless Contralateral Routing of Signal Technology in Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users with Bilateral Profound Hearing Loss. J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 Jul/Aug;30(7):579-589. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17121. Epub 2018 Dec 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30541657 (View on PubMed)

Snapp H. Nonsurgical Management of Single-Sided Deafness: Contralateral Routing of Signal. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2019 Apr;80(2):132-138. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1677687. Epub 2019 Jan 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30931220 (View on PubMed)

Lieu JE, Tye-Murray N, Karzon RK, Piccirillo JF. Unilateral hearing loss is associated with worse speech-language scores in children. Pediatrics. 2010 Jun;125(6):e1348-55. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2448. Epub 2010 May 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20457680 (View on PubMed)

McKay S, Gravel JS, Tharpe AM. Amplification considerations for children with minimal or mild bilateral hearing loss and unilateral hearing loss. Trends Amplif. 2008 Mar;12(1):43-54. doi: 10.1177/1084713807313570.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18270178 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SRF-377

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ROCC Knee Data Collection
NCT00758901 TERMINATED
Calypso Knee System Clinical Study
NCT03671213 COMPLETED NA
EVI-01-IT Safety Study
NCT05422976 COMPLETED NA