Evaluation of the Clinical Benefit of a Transmitter for Contralateral Routing of Signals (CROS)
NCT ID: NCT05106413
Last Updated: 2022-04-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
23 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-10-26
2022-03-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Chondrofix Osteochondral Allograft Prospective Study
NCT01410136
Losartan to Improve Hip Microfracture
NCT04212650
Real-life Assessment of the Safety and Performance of the SYNOVIUM HCS Device
NCT06087705
Evaluation of the CR Plug (Allograft) for the Treatment of a Cartilage Injury in the Knee.
NCT00793104
The Clinical Outcome of BiCRI in the Treatment of Chondral and Osteochondral Lesions
NCT05924763
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
One solution for unaidable UHL is Contralateral Routing of Signals (CROS) and Bilateral Contralateral routing of signals (BiCROS) using a so- called CROS transmitter together with a hearing aid.
The rationale for this clinical investigation is to collect clinical data with a rechargeable CROS transmitter to evaluate the benefits of a BiCROS fitting compared to the alternative treatment option, the monaural hearing aid fitting, and to no treatment in noisy listening situations.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Speech Intelligibility with CROS device
The focus of this study is on Speech Intelligibility (SI), evaluated by the Oldenburg Sentence test (OLSA), which measures a speech recognition threshold (SRT) in dB SNR (signal to noise ratio).
Therefore each participant will perform the tests with the experimental rechargeable CROS transmitter (CROS) in different interventions, like comparison to monaural fitting and unaided condition.
All participants will perform the same tests. The order of the intervention in the speech test is randomized, but will be performed in the same visit by each participant.
BiCROS fitting
Each participant will be fitted with the experimental CROS device on the poorer, unaidable ear and with a compatible hearing device on the other ear.
Monaural fitting
Each participant will be fitted with a hearing aid on the better hearing ear and no device on the poorer, unaidable ear.
Monaural hearing aid fitting acts as control intervention.
Unaided condition
No treatment, i.e. the participants are not fitted with a CROS device and/ or hearing aid.
Unaided condition acts as control intervention.
CROS baseline
Each participant will be fitted with the experimental CROS device on the poorer, unaidable ear and with a compatible device on the other ear. The difference to the BiCROS condition is the setup of the microphones in the CROS device and the compatible hearing device.
This test condition is only tested for speech intelligibility in diffuse noise and acts as control intervention.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
BiCROS fitting
Each participant will be fitted with the experimental CROS device on the poorer, unaidable ear and with a compatible hearing device on the other ear.
Monaural fitting
Each participant will be fitted with a hearing aid on the better hearing ear and no device on the poorer, unaidable ear.
Monaural hearing aid fitting acts as control intervention.
Unaided condition
No treatment, i.e. the participants are not fitted with a CROS device and/ or hearing aid.
Unaided condition acts as control intervention.
CROS baseline
Each participant will be fitted with the experimental CROS device on the poorer, unaidable ear and with a compatible device on the other ear. The difference to the BiCROS condition is the setup of the microphones in the CROS device and the compatible hearing device.
This test condition is only tested for speech intelligibility in diffuse noise and acts as control intervention.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* good written and spoken (Swiss) German language skills
* ability to fill in a questionnaire conscientiously
* informed consent as documented by signature
* asymmetric hearing loss: one unaidable ear (min. N6 hearing loss) / the other ear with N3 or N4 hearing loss
* availability of Smartphone
* availability of TV or Tablet
* ability to operate and handle the investigational device
* ability to describe listening impressions/experiences and the use of the hearing aid
* Ability to produce a reliable hearing test result
Exclusion Criteria
* aidable hearing loss on the intended CROS side
* acute tinnitus (in either one ear and occurrence less than three months)
* anatomical deformity of the CROS ear (e.g. absence of the auricle)
* Known hypersensitivity or allergy to materials of the investigational device
* any auricle deformities, that prevents secure placement of the (test) devices
* no willingness to test the investigational device system
* no willingness to test the investigational device system for at least 8h a day
* Hint for psychological problems from investigators point of view
* reported fluctuating hearing that could influence the test result
* reported symptoms of vertigo and dizziness by participants
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sonova AG
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sonova AG
Stäfa, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bagatto M, DesGeorges J, King A, Kitterick P, Laurnagaray D, Lewis D, Roush P, Sladen DP, Tharpe AM. Consensus practice parameter: audiological assessment and management of unilateral hearing loss in children. Int J Audiol. 2019 Dec;58(12):805-815. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1654620. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
Snapp HA, Hoffer ME, Spahr A, Rajguru S. Application of Wireless Contralateral Routing of Signal Technology in Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users with Bilateral Profound Hearing Loss. J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 Jul/Aug;30(7):579-589. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17121. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
Snapp H. Nonsurgical Management of Single-Sided Deafness: Contralateral Routing of Signal. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2019 Apr;80(2):132-138. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1677687. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
Lieu JE, Tye-Murray N, Karzon RK, Piccirillo JF. Unilateral hearing loss is associated with worse speech-language scores in children. Pediatrics. 2010 Jun;125(6):e1348-55. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2448. Epub 2010 May 10.
McKay S, Gravel JS, Tharpe AM. Amplification considerations for children with minimal or mild bilateral hearing loss and unilateral hearing loss. Trends Amplif. 2008 Mar;12(1):43-54. doi: 10.1177/1084713807313570.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SRF-377
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.