Joint Attention-Based Occupational Therapy Intervention in Pre-Schoolers With Autism Spectrum Disorder
NCT ID: NCT05106166
Last Updated: 2021-11-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-04-01
2021-06-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The present study was designed as a randomized controlled study, including pre-post testing. The Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ), Autism Behaviour Checklist (ABC), and A Motor-Free Visual Perception Test 4 (MVPT-4) were implemented to measure the participants' conditions before and after the intervention.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A social communication questionnaire (SCQ), autistic behavior checklist (ABC), and motor-free visual perception test-4 (MVPT-4) were administered to the children before and after the intervention, and the results were compared.
The SCQ was developed to evaluate the social communication of individuals with autism. The total score can be between 0-and 39 for children who can speak. The SCQ which comprises three sub-dimensions: reciprocal social interaction, language and communication, and repetitive and stereotyped patterns has the validity and reliability in Turkish.
The ABC is among the scales used for screening and evaluating education in autism in many countries. The ABC consists of five sub-dimensions: sensory, relating, body or object use, language, and social and self-help. The total score is between 0-159.
MVPT-4 is an instrument that presents a fast, reliable, and valid evaluation of children and adults' general and visual perceptual abilities. MVPT-4 consists of 45 items that are organized and grouped to provide a smooth implementation process. The items consist of black and white drawings and patterns developed to present answer options, making the implementation easy in a multiple-choice form. Motor skills are not necessary to get a response, which makes this test useful, especially for people with motor disabilities.
All children included in the study attend a usual special education program (USEP) 2 sessions per week in a rehabilitation center. The USEP studied was including gross motor skills, communication skills, preschool preparation skills, and self-care skills. The control group of the study consisted of children attending the USEP. Children in the study group received an occupational therapy intervention based on joint attention in addition to the USEP they continued. As an intervention in the study group, the sessions were conducted three days a week for a total of 12 weeks. The initial assessments were administered to children in both groups. At the end of the 12 weeks, the evaluations were repeated in both groups.
The acquisition frame of reference, which proposes to shape the behaviors that contribute to skill acquisition, and the developmental frame of reference, which emphasizes the continuous change and emergence of skills with age, guided the occupational therapy intervention. Therefore, all activities were designed according to the chronological and developmental ages of the children. During the joint attention-based intervention sessions, holistic occupational therapy approaches for the child's sensory, physical, social, language and communication deficits were discussed.
The steps followed are:
1. Each parent was interviewed about the child's preferences. The toy types preferred by a child and the toys that a child might react negatively to were identified. The intervention specialist selected a total of 15 toys for paired stimulus preference assessments. Five of these toys were stuffed animals and figures. Five comprised multi-part activities, and the other five consisted of toys activated by light, movement, and/or sound. Each group of toys was used according to the child's interests and habits in three stages: creating a response to a joint attention offer, initiating joint attention, and reinforcing a joint attention response.
2. During the joint attention-based occupational therapy intervention, researchers paid attention to maintaining eye contact and following the child's lead. Activities were conducted at the desk and on the floor. A game pattern was created using the selected toys; the pattern was planned and implemented as activities for an average of 20 minutes.
3. In the sessions, (a) fine motor activities such as handicrafts, finger games; (b) gross motor activities such as obstacle course, music, dance; (c) visual-motor activities such as drawing, cutting, and assembly were used. Initiating and responding to joint attention during these activities was the focus of the intervention. With the training, the aim was to generalize behavioral skills and transfer them to the context of social play.
4. It is stated that compatible environmental arrangements that will provide visual cues are important when structuring environmental activities because children with autism respond to the use of visual input. For this reason, environmental arrangements were made with visual stimuli that could attract a child's attention.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental group: occupational therapy program + the usual special education program (USEP)
The practitioner used the less-to-more orientation to get the child to respond to the offer of joint attention. For example, if the child did not respond to the joint attention offer within 5-10 seconds, practitioner first directed the child, used exaggerated gestures, gave a moving hint if he still did not respond, and physically slowly directed the child's head towards the target if he still did not respond. In addition, the practitioner gave a verbal command (practitioner said: look at how his arms are waving, pointing to the toy, now look at me). When the child looked at the toy and reacted, he again gave enthusiastic and activity-appropriate feedback (e.g. he tickled the child, saying, "Isn't it weird, is there ever such a long arm?"). The child's interest and leadership in the activities were followed, including what the child did and said. Positive feedback was then provided.
Occupational Therapy
occupational therapy sessions are based on the joint attention
Control group: the usual special education program (USEP)
The USEP studied was including gross motor skills, communication skills, preschool preparation skills, and self-care skills. The control group of the study consisted of children attending the USEP.
Occupational Therapy
occupational therapy sessions are based on the joint attention
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Occupational Therapy
occupational therapy sessions are based on the joint attention
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* consenting to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* had no previous education or training.
4 Years
6 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hacettepe University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sümeyye Belhan Çelik
Physiotherapist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sümeyye Belhan Çelik, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hacettepe University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hacettepe University
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2020/126
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id