Virtual Chromoendoscopy With Magnification in Coeliac Disease.

NCT ID: NCT05103150

Last Updated: 2022-03-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-01

Study Completion Date

2023-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

High-definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE) does not usually allow the visualization of duodenal villous patterns and may be inaccurate for assessing coeliac disease (CD). To the best of the knowledge of the authorship, there is no prospective study that has evaluated the accuracy of combining high-definition optical magnification (HD-OM) with i-Scan optical enhancement (OE) virtual chromoendoscopy for evaluation of duodenal villous patterns in the context of CD suspicion. Combining both techniques can also guide better duodenal biopsies. This study pursues to compare diagnostic accuracy between HD-WLE and HD-OM with OE using histology as the gold standard in detecting villous abnormalities in CD.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

High-definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE) does not usually allow the visualization of duodenal villous patterns and may be inaccurate for assessing coeliac disease (CD). In addition, HD-WLE findings depend on CD severity. The lesser the disease severity, the higher possibility of showing a normal HD-WLE appearance. Thus, sampling routine duodenal biopsies have been suggested. However, this is time-consuming, expensive, and maybe excessive in low-risk groups. Sampling routine duodenal biopsies could also be unsuccessful, obtaining normal biopsies.

Novel endoscopic techniques have played an exciting role in increasing the accuracy of macroscopic evaluation of duodenal villous patterns. There have been described retrospective and prospective studies using chromoendoscopy, narrow-band imaging, optical coherence tomography, water immersion, confocal laser endomicroscopy, high-resolution magnification endoscopy, capsule endoscopy, and I-scan technology. However, results are disjunct, with no consensus.

The iSCAN optical enhancementTM (OE) System (PENTAX Medical, Tokyo, Japan) virtual chromoendoscopy has been developed to improve the blood vessels' visibility, ducts of the glands, and surface structures in addition to the traditional iSCAN functions. High-definition optical magnification (HD-OM) endoscopes have been developed and can combine HD imaging with OM to produce detailed images with a magnification of up to 136X. This imaging technique facilitates the evaluation of the superficial vascular aspects of the mucosa, enabling the identification of early signs of inflammation or lesions not previously seen with conventional endoscopy.

Prospective data have demonstrated that magnification endoscopy has superior diagnostic sensitivity in detecting villous atrophy compared to HD-WLE, being efficiently handled by all endoscopists. On another side, virtual chromoendoscopy has shown disjunct results across the literature. To the best of the knowledge of the authorship, there is no prospective study that has assessed the accuracy of combining HD-OM with i-Scan OE for evaluation of duodenal villous patterns in the context of CD suspicion. Combining both techniques can also guide better duodenal biopsies.

This study pursues to better characterize duodenal mucosa through OE with HD-OM in gluten-free diet (GFD) naïve patients with CD suspicion to correlate these findings with histology. As a second aim, to compare diagnostic accuracy between HD-WLE and HD-OM with OE using histology as the gold standard in detecting villous abnormalities in CD.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Celiac Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

High-definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE)

Evaluation of the duodenal mucosa with HD-WLE (EG-29i10 gastroscope and EPKi7010 video processor). The endoscopy images will be seen on a 27inch, flat panel, high-definition LCD monitor (Radiance™ ultraSC-WU27-G1520 model) by one endoscopist, randomly assigned via esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

There were used the following standard endoscopic findings were: a) "scalloping" or dented aspect of the duodenal folds; b) submucosal vascular pattern; c) "mosaicism" or micronodular look of the mucosa; d) grooves and fissurations of the mucosa.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

HD-WLE plus I-Scan optical enhancement (OE) virtual chromoendoscopy with High-definition optical magnification (HD-OM)

Evaluation of the duodenal mucosa through upper endoscopy with the OE System (EPK-i7010 HD Video Processor and MagniView™ EG-2990Zi Video Gastroscope) with intravenous sedation in a standardized manner. This technique involves using a distal black rubber hood (OE-A58; Pentax) at the tip of the endoscope, to fix the distance between the tip of the endoscope and the gastric mucosa at 2 mm. The OE System will be used in mode one and mode two without HD-OM to obtain an overview of the duodenal surface and identify any changes in the mucosa, then HD-OM will be implemented.

There were used OE criteria as previously validated by Cammarota et al: brightness, Ave/peak, blue, red, surface, contrast, and tone enhancement.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients naïve to GFD;
* With clinical history suggestive of malabsorption (weight loss, chronic diarrhea, iron-deficiency, anemia, etc.);
* And serologic suspicion of CD as positive or borderline antiendomysial (normal values are absent for both IgA and IgG) and antitransglutaminase antibodies (normal values 0-10 U/mL).

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of severe gastrointestinal or systemic disease (e.g., chronic pancreatitis, liver cirrhosis, and blood coagulation disorders) impacts cardiovascular risk assessment.
* Presence of duodenal ulcer in the context of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
* History of any type of duodenal surgery.
* Pregnancy or nursing female.
* Refusal to participate in this observational trial.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

79 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Carlos Robles-Medranda, MD FASGE

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ecuadorian Institute of Digestive Diseases

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ecuadorian Institute of Digestive Diseases

Guayaquil, Guayas, Ecuador

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Ecuador

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Raju SA, White WL, Lau MS, Mooney PD, Rees MA, Burden M, Ciacci C, Sanders DS. A comparison study between Magniview and high definition white light endoscopy in detecting villous atrophy and coeliac disease: A single centre pilot study. Dig Liver Dis. 2018 Sep;50(9):920-924. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.03.037. Epub 2018 Apr 11.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29807874 (View on PubMed)

Gadermayr M, Wimmer G, Kogler H, Vecsei A, Merhof D, Uhl A. Automated classification of celiac disease during upper endoscopy: Status quo and quo vadis. Comput Biol Med. 2018 Nov 1;102:221-226. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.04.020. Epub 2018 Apr 27.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29739614 (View on PubMed)

Bonatto MW, Kotze L, Orlandoski M, Tsuchyia R, de Carvalho CA, Lima D, Kurachi G, Orso IR, Kotze L. Endoscopic evaluation of celiac disease severity and its correlation with histopathological aspects of the duodenal mucosa. Endosc Int Open. 2016 Jul;4(7):E767-77. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108190. Epub 2016 Jun 29.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27556094 (View on PubMed)

Iacucci M, Poon T, Gui XS, Subrata G. High definition i-SCAN endoscopy with water immersion technique accurately reflects histological severity of celiac disease. Endosc Int Open. 2016 May;4(5):E540-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-105955. Epub 2016 May 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27227112 (View on PubMed)

Penny HA, Mooney PD, Burden M, Patel N, Johnston AJ, Wong SH, Teare J, Sanders DS. High definition endoscopy with or without I-Scan increases the detection of celiac disease during routine endoscopy. Dig Liver Dis. 2016 Jun;48(6):644-9. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Feb 26.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26995214 (View on PubMed)

Ianiro G, Gasbarrini A, Cammarota G. Endoscopic tools for the diagnosis and evaluation of celiac disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec 14;19(46):8562-70. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i46.8562.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24379573 (View on PubMed)

De Luca L, Ricciardiello L, Rocchi MB, Fabi MT, Bianchi ML, de Leone A, Fiori S, Baroncini D. Narrow band imaging with magnification endoscopy for celiac disease: results from a prospective, single-center study. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2013;2013:580526. doi: 10.1155/2013/580526. Epub 2013 Aug 6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23983448 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IECED-10142021

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Response Assessment in SB CD
NCT03646708 RECRUITING