Clinical Trial on the Efficacy of Different Masks With and Without a Peripheral Sealing Device, Against Covid-19

NCT ID: NCT05079308

Last Updated: 2021-10-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

210 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-01

Study Completion Date

2021-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A significant number of professionals subjected to high-risk situations have been infected by Covid-19, due to the lack of adequate respiratory protection equipment or poor marginal sealing adjustments. Then, the objective of this study is to determine if there are statistically significant differences in the level of respiratory protection of type IIR surgical face masks and filtering face masks, used with and without a peripheral sealing device, against the contagion of Covid-19 or other harmful biological agents. The proposed device is a thermoplastic resin ring composed of a reusable and biodegradable polylactic acid designed to be used in a healthcare environment. The individuals of the study will be submitted to qualitative fit tests, that meet current Ocupational Security and Health Administration (OSHA) standard. The mentioned qualitative fit test uses a sodium saccharin solution to evaluate the respiratory protection equipment in professionals in hospitals, emergency centers, and early childhood education centers.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of the research is to determine if there are statistically significant differences in the level of respiratory protection in situations of high risk against the contagion of Covid-19 or other harmful biological agents, in subjects who use filtering face pieces (FFP2) with or without a peripheral sealing device (AMS), Type IIR surgical face masks with or without a AMS, and subjects using the FFP2 filtering face mask simultaneously with the Type IIR surgical face mask. For this, a total of 210 individuals were selected from different environments in order to attain diversity, while controlling for representativeness bias. They were selected from the ADEMA University School - UIB, nursing staff from the Infectious Diseases Service at Son Espases University Hospital, 112 Emergency Service of the Autonomous Community of the Balearic Islands and the General Directorate of Planning and Centers of the Ministry of Education and Professional Training (Balearic Islands, Spain).

Participants were assigned to one of the 5 groups and subgroups, after accepting their participation in the study voluntarily and freely by signing the consent form approved by the CEI-IB.

To evaluate the adjustment of the respiratory protective equipment with and without the personalized peripheral sealing device (AMS), a sweet sensitivity test was performed with the 3M FT-10 Qualitative Fit-Test Kit (Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA), which complies with the current standards of the Occupational Security and Health Administration (OSHA) and according to the protocol described in Riutord-Sbert et al. (2021). During the qualitative fit test, a total of seven mobility exercises of 60 seconds each were performed, and the nebulizer was squeezed, every 30 seconds:

Phase 1 - Normal breathing Phase 2 - Slow and deep breathing Phase 3 - Breathing whilst moving the head to both sides Phase 4 - Breathing whilst moving the head up and down Phase 5 - Breathing spelling the alphabet Phase 6 - Breathing whilst moving up and down from the waist Phase 7 - Normal breathing

If the fit test was completed within 7 minutes without the individual having detected the sweet taste, the seal was considered optimal or adequate and the experiment was graded as APPROVED. If the subject detected the sweet test before seven minutes, the adjustment was considered inadequate and was scored as FAILED, noting the time it took to detect the sweet taste as established in the protocol of the 3M FT-10 Fit test (Riutord-Sbert et al. 2021).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Covid19 Personal Protective Equipment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Filtering face piece with peripheral sealing device

Individuals using the Filtering face Piece (FFP2) with the Peripheral Sealing Device (AMS).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Peripheral sealing device for surgical mask or filtering face piece

Intervention Type DEVICE

The individuals used a Peripheral Sealing Device on a surgical mask or a filtering face piece mask and were submitted to a qualitative fit test, regulated by the Occupational Security and Health Administration (USA).

Filtering face piece without peripheral sealing device

Individuals using the Filtering face Piece (FFP2) without the AMS;

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Peripheral sealing device for surgical mask or filtering face piece

Intervention Type DEVICE

The individuals used a Peripheral Sealing Device on a surgical mask or a filtering face piece mask and were submitted to a qualitative fit test, regulated by the Occupational Security and Health Administration (USA).

IIR surgical mask with peripheral sealing device

Individuals using the Surgical mask (SM) with the AMS;

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Peripheral sealing device for surgical mask or filtering face piece

Intervention Type DEVICE

The individuals used a Peripheral Sealing Device on a surgical mask or a filtering face piece mask and were submitted to a qualitative fit test, regulated by the Occupational Security and Health Administration (USA).

IIR surgical mask without peripheral sealing device

Individuals using the Surgical mask (SM) without the AMS;

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Peripheral sealing device for surgical mask or filtering face piece

Intervention Type DEVICE

The individuals used a Peripheral Sealing Device on a surgical mask or a filtering face piece mask and were submitted to a qualitative fit test, regulated by the Occupational Security and Health Administration (USA).

Filtering face piece with IIR surgical mask

individuals using a FFP2 with a SM over it, simultaneously, without the AMS.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

IIR Surgical mask with Filtering face piece

Intervention Type DEVICE

The individuals used a IIR surgical mask with a filtering face piece mask and were submitted to a qualitative fit test, regulated by the Occupational Security and Health Administration (USA).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Peripheral sealing device for surgical mask or filtering face piece

The individuals used a Peripheral Sealing Device on a surgical mask or a filtering face piece mask and were submitted to a qualitative fit test, regulated by the Occupational Security and Health Administration (USA).

Intervention Type DEVICE

IIR Surgical mask with Filtering face piece

The individuals used a IIR surgical mask with a filtering face piece mask and were submitted to a qualitative fit test, regulated by the Occupational Security and Health Administration (USA).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* people familiar with the use of face masks, absence of allergy or intolerance to sodium saccharin or materials used, absence of relevant systemic diseases, age between 18-65 years, absence of obvious facial hair and signing the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* people not familiar with the use of face masks, presence of allergy or intolerance to sodium saccharin or materials used, presence of relevant systemic diseases, presence of obvious facial hair and not signing the informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of the Balearic Islands

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

ADEMA University School

Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UBalearicIslands

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id