Comparison of Inflammatory Cytokine Levels Between Single-port and Three-port Thoracoscopic Lobectomy in the Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancersurgery on Perioperative Clinical Indexes、Inflammatory Reaction and Quality of Life Scores of Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT ID: NCT05070026
Last Updated: 2022-08-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
68 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-10-01
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The successful experience of the first single-port thoracoscopic wedge resection of the lung in 2004 provided us with a new surgical idea. Subsequently, a large number of domestic and international studies and case reports show that single-port thoracoscopic surgery is safe and feasible in lobectomy and segmental resection. With the rapid development of single-port thoracoscopic surgery in recent years, the scope of application and clinical efficacy of the surgery are gradually becoming equivalent to the traditional three-port thoracoscopic surgery, which can ensure the safety of the operation and complete tumor resection, and has its own characteristics and advantages compared with the traditional three-port thoracoscopic surgery. The reduction of incisions can significantly improve the postoperative pain and recovery of patients and wound healing.
In addition, single-port thoracoscopic surgery also has a subtle improvement in patients' intraoperative and postoperative inflammatory response compared with traditional three-port thoracoscopic surgery. In this study, we compared and analyzed the intraoperative and postoperative inflammatory factor levels of single-port thoracoscopic surgery and three-port thoracoscopic surgery in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Through the comparison of the measured values, we further discussed the advantages of single-port thoracoscopic surgery in reducing inflammatory response and its application and promotion value in the treatment of patients with NSCLC compared with traditional three-port thoracoscopic surgery.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Multiple-portal VATS Versus Uniportal VATS Lobectomy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT02462356
Comparison of Segmentectomy Versus Lobectomy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer ≤ 2 cm in the Middle Third of the Lung Field
NCT04944563
Uniportal Versus Triportal Thoracoscopic Lobectomy and Sublobectomy for Early Stage Lung Cancer
NCT02933294
To Explore the Related Factors of Cough After Thoracoscopic Pneumonectomy
NCT04204148
Curative Effect and Quality of Life Between Uniportal and Open Sleeve Lobectomy for Central Type Lung Cancer
NCT03523468
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
uni-portal VATS group
uni-portal VATS group
patients received pulmonary lobectomy under general anesthesia by using uni-portal VATS method
three port VATS group
three port VATS group
patients received pulmonary lobectomy under under general anesthesia by using three port VATS method
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
uni-portal VATS group
patients received pulmonary lobectomy under general anesthesia by using uni-portal VATS method
three port VATS group
patients received pulmonary lobectomy under under general anesthesia by using three port VATS method
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shengjing Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yanchao Yang
principal investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Shengjing Hospital
Shenyang, Liaoning, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
uni-portal and three port VATS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.