Comparison of Inflammatory Cytokine Levels Between Single-port and Three-port Thoracoscopic Lobectomy in the Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancersurgery on Perioperative Clinical Indexes、Inflammatory Reaction and Quality of Life Scores of Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

NCT ID: NCT05070026

Last Updated: 2022-08-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

68 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-01

Study Completion Date

2021-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Many recent studies have shown that surgical trauma will result in an immunosuppressive state. Combined with the effect of surgical stress, it will often lead to metabolic changes, systemic inflammatory response, and other problems. The body resists and removes the harmful factors through the inflammatory reaction. However, an excessive reaction will damage the normal tissues and cells of the body. The smooth recovery of the body needs to balance the degree of inflammatory reaction. Surgical patients will trigger different degrees of an inflammatory response due to different degrees of physical trauma, which runs through the process of postoperative recovery from the beginning of surgery and often prolongs the time of postoperative recovery. Reducing the intraoperative and postoperative inflammatory response of patients has always been the goal of surgeons, and a method is the reduction of surgical trauma.

The successful experience of the first single-port thoracoscopic wedge resection of the lung in 2004 provided us with a new surgical idea. Subsequently, a large number of domestic and international studies and case reports show that single-port thoracoscopic surgery is safe and feasible in lobectomy and segmental resection. With the rapid development of single-port thoracoscopic surgery in recent years, the scope of application and clinical efficacy of the surgery are gradually becoming equivalent to the traditional three-port thoracoscopic surgery, which can ensure the safety of the operation and complete tumor resection, and has its own characteristics and advantages compared with the traditional three-port thoracoscopic surgery. The reduction of incisions can significantly improve the postoperative pain and recovery of patients and wound healing.

In addition, single-port thoracoscopic surgery also has a subtle improvement in patients' intraoperative and postoperative inflammatory response compared with traditional three-port thoracoscopic surgery. In this study, we compared and analyzed the intraoperative and postoperative inflammatory factor levels of single-port thoracoscopic surgery and three-port thoracoscopic surgery in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Through the comparison of the measured values, we further discussed the advantages of single-port thoracoscopic surgery in reducing inflammatory response and its application and promotion value in the treatment of patients with NSCLC compared with traditional three-port thoracoscopic surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Inflammatory Reaction Life Scores

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

uni-portal VATS group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

uni-portal VATS group

Intervention Type OTHER

patients received pulmonary lobectomy under general anesthesia by using uni-portal VATS method

three port VATS group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

three port VATS group

Intervention Type OTHER

patients received pulmonary lobectomy under under general anesthesia by using three port VATS method

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

uni-portal VATS group

patients received pulmonary lobectomy under general anesthesia by using uni-portal VATS method

Intervention Type OTHER

three port VATS group

patients received pulmonary lobectomy under under general anesthesia by using three port VATS method

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* (1) NSCLC was diagnosed by imaging examination (chest enhanced computed tomography or positron emission tomography-computed tomography) and biopsy pathology; (2) TNM stage was stage I and II; (3) the patient had indications of radical operation; (4) the patient had good cardiopulmonary, liver, and kidney function and no obvious surgical contraindication before operation; (5) the preoperative inflammatory indexes of all patients were within the normal range

Exclusion Criteria

* (1) the thoracoscopic operation was converted to thoractomy; (2) the operation time was more than 3 hours; (3) blood vessel rupture occurred during the operation, and the bleeding amount was more than 200 mL; (4) the patient had complications (the patient had fever exceeding 38.5 ℃, chest computed tomography confirmed intrapulmonary infection, incision infection, postoperative bleeding, requiring secondary thoracotomy, etc.).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shengjing Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yanchao Yang

principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Shengjing Hospital

Shenyang, Liaoning, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

uni-portal and three port VATS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.